Engine/Power - non turbo (All non turbo Imprezas) Who needs a turbo when you have 2500cc? Cams, intakes, exhausts, etc. The 2.2L and 1.8L Subies are cool too.
View Poll Results: Which Drop In Air Filter Do You Use With OEM Box?
K & N
33
58.93%
Green
1
1.79%
HKS
4
7.14%
OEM STI
6
10.71%
Other?
12
21.43%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

Drop In Airbox Filters?

Old Jun 12, 2006 | 03:58 PM
  #1  
NW OBS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,900
From: Baja Oregon
Car Info: '05 Impreza Outback Sport ~ "WTF! Two-Toned?"
Lightbulb Drop In Airbox Filters?

Here's the deal.

I finished reading an independent test conducted over a two year period on equipment that could measure both the flow AND the filtration properties of many brands of air filters. Take 5 minutes and read link below ~

***** http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm *****

Guess what? The K&N absolutely sucked in both catagories ~ in fact, a cheap paper Fram filter posted WAY ahead of the K&N!

Which brings me to this. I now, or shortly will have, two oiled air filters (which can and DO foul the MAF sensor with oil residue ~ even from the factory BEFORE a 're-oil'). These would be the K&N and a Green (both cotton based and oil soaked).

Then I have an HKS (3 layer ~ closed cell foam technology) dry, with NO oil (therefore no chance to foul the MAF sensor).

Finally an STI OEM paper drop in (dry. no oil foul issues either) as well as the original OEM from my OBS.

I am using a 'snorkus' delete with fresh air coming from the inner fender (simple 3" straight pipe right out the back of the box into the inner fender)

Anyone? Thoughts... opinions... impressions from using one of these brands listed above?

Last edited by NW OBS; Jun 15, 2006 at 02:13 PM.
Old Jun 12, 2006 | 07:16 PM
  #2  
RewSupul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 180
From: Indy
Car Info: '06 Impreza 2.5i
I don't know, i went with a cold air, but everything i've read on the subject i've seen ALOT of people talking about using foam filters. 'specially on the wrx's which alot of people argue that CAI are not worth anything.
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 03:57 AM
  #3  
grifter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 17
From: North Carolina
Car Info: '06 Impreza SportWagon
I've been using K&N for years myself. Maybe Subarus are just incredibly sensitive because I haven't had a single problem with MAF fouling, even on my modified GTI. It was in there for 4 years in a modified factory airbox. When I was delivering packages, I put 62k miles on the one in my van, again with no issues.
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 06:33 AM
  #4  
turbo_4_life's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,483
From: California
Car Info: 04 wrx
subaru and Drop-in filters doesnt seem to want to mix..
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 02:00 PM
  #5  
NW OBS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,900
From: Baja Oregon
Car Info: '05 Impreza Outback Sport ~ "WTF! Two-Toned?"
Exclamation ???

Originally Posted by turbo_4_life
subaru and Drop-in filters doesnt seem to want to mix..
Huh?

There are a s***load of modified snorkel-less modified air boxes with drop ins.
I just have all these filter choices and felt I should try another after a very bad review on K&N ~ air flow and filtering was WAY on the bottom of others tested!

Will go search for this thread now ~ stay tuned! Here it is ~ added it to orginal post as well!

***** http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm *****

Last edited by NW OBS; Jun 15, 2006 at 02:14 PM.
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #6  
NW OBS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,900
From: Baja Oregon
Car Info: '05 Impreza Outback Sport ~ "WTF! Two-Toned?"
Cool Come On!

There must be hundreds of Imprezas out here running 'drop ins' VOTE!

bump
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 04:19 PM
  #7  
ezombie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 920
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 2005 OBP WRX
Foam degrades after a bit doesn't it? I wouldn't want any of that flyin into the turbo.....just wondering if that is something to worry about.

I would think that if you want to avoid any damage to anything i.e. MAF sensor or turbo then paper might be the best solution. Still a noob but thats my .02.

Last edited by ezombie; Jun 16, 2006 at 04:26 PM.
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #8  
NW OBS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,900
From: Baja Oregon
Car Info: '05 Impreza Outback Sport ~ "WTF! Two-Toned?"
You have to replace foam (like paper)... but that's OK, the HKS is like $29, compared to $67 (my cost with employee discount) STI paper. But, I am leaning towards the STI version at this point... may just run 'em all and see if one feels better then the other, or even sounds better. The 'butt dyno' should feel NO difference!
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 04:12 PM
  #9  
SubySal's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 341
From: High in the Rockies!... but not too high
Car Info: 2004 2.5RS pacifica blue with black Tarmacs
I don't doubt the test results, but I'm a diehard K&N fan and here's why. A few years back I had a '78 FJ40 Toyota Land Cruiser that spent alot of time on trails. One spot we frequented had this fine silt that made it's way past the stock paper filter and collected on the throat of the carb. I told one of my friends about it and he recommended a K&N drop-in, so I tried it. After that no more silt. In fact I never found anything on the carb throat anymore. That made me a believer. I'm also not to concerned about the 3.13% difference in filtration between the AC and the K&N filters. Especially with my Suby which sees alot less dirt then the FJ40 did. I'm more concerned with flow.

It's unfortunate that the K&N's mess with MAP's in WRX's, but I've had a K&N drop-in on my CAI equipped '04 RS for over 35k miles with no problems.

Last edited by SubySal; Jul 10, 2006 at 04:25 PM.
Old Jul 10, 2006 | 04:48 PM
  #10  
TheScoobyMedic's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 612
From: san jose, ca
Car Info: 05 wrx
im rockin the STi filter from now on...the oil was coatin my MAF, now im all G
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #11  
herb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 19
From: Sonora, CA
Car Info: 2001 Impreza RS
Herb

I had some problems with the oil from my K&N messing with the sensor too. It eventually cleared out with some carb cleaner and a little time, but it was frustrating to loose power from an "upgrade". The Subie MAF's are probably not more "sensitive" to oil, they are just closer to the filter or they are right in the path of the mist of oil. I'm not sure.

I think it comes down to this: If you spend time dirt rallying or live on a dirt road, you should go with the K&N (or similar product) and go light on the oil. If you drive strickly street, you should use something cheap like a Fram, so it won't break the bank when you have to keep replacing it.
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 12:17 AM
  #12  
WRX409's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,069
From: Allentown,PA
Car Info: 04 WRX
K/N air filters will flow the most CFM's.
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 11:52 AM
  #13  
NW OBS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,900
From: Baja Oregon
Car Info: '05 Impreza Outback Sport ~ "WTF! Two-Toned?"
Lightbulb Quick update!

I took one of my Subaru techs (I am a salesman at a Subie dealer) for a few runs at night a month or so ago. Here's what we did.

I had a new Green, K&N, STI (SPT high performance part) and HKS 3 layer foam filter. All 'drop ins', all new. We took a road loop with me driving 1st and then him. Stop and go and then a quick hard run on a twisty country road. With each change of filter, the ECM was reset and re-calibrated.

We felt no difference between the K&N, Green and STI. When we threw in the HKS he (the tech) felt the difference with the HKS from the pass seat! When he drove he confirmed as well as did I. Better throttle response and acceleration seemed to be had from the HKS.

The HKS was the butt dyno favorite ~ The STI offered the same performance as the K&N and Green, but because it was un-oiled has no chance of fouling the MAF sensor. The STI and HKS were both louder at full WOT then the Green or K&N.

The HKS is three layers of none oiled foam and therefore not going to foul the MAF sensor either.

So, I kept the HKS in and I am running it now with great results. Sold off the other three (STI/Green/K&N) at work.

Would be interesting to do the same with a dyno, but don't have the time or $$$. So, settled on our crude but conclusive test...

...for what it is worth.
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #14  
lethal1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 26
From: Buffalo
Car Info: 06 2.5i Sedan 5spd
Would you happen to have the part number for that hks. I have had hks in all my cars and I wanna keep it that way. I have an 06 2.5i, even though I don't think that should matter.
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 10:30 AM
  #15  
lethal1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 26
From: Buffalo
Car Info: 06 2.5i Sedan 5spd
HKS filter

Would you happen to have the part number for that hks. I have had hks in all my cars and I wanna keep it that way. I have an 06 2.5i, even though I don't think that should matter.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:42 AM.