Converting MAF to MAP...
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 68
From: Michigan
Car Info: 1998 Subaru Impreza 2.2l
Are there any Bonuses of having a MAP system over a MAF? Is there any way to convert MAF to MAP? Do CAI’s run better on either of the two systems?
I want to do some Air Intake projects, but need to learn more before I start experimenting...
I want to do some Air Intake projects, but need to learn more before I start experimenting...
NASIOC Slut
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,723
From: Roseville, CA
Car Info: 1995 Subaru Impreza 1.8 L
You would have to swap ECU's and redo alot of wiring. MAF is actually a better design, because its detecting airflow in the intake tract as opposed to in the throttle body area, along with one or two other technical reasons that deal with pressure vs. air flow... Im sure someone else here has a better explaination for this one.
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 720
From: The Hunted Forest
Car Info: Mazda Protege '02 (Wishing protege has AWD and a H6 twin turbo)
Originally Posted by Kostamojen
You would have to swap ECU's and redo alot of wiring. MAF is actually a better design, because its detecting airflow in the intake tract as opposed to in the throttle body area, along with one or two other technical reasons that deal with pressure vs. air flow... Im sure someone else here has a better explaination for this one.
Its better because its more responsive.
It detects as you said the air flow across a wire or panel. This determs the flow going into the engine with a reading of how hot the air is.
Map mesures the pressure and the temperature. Its inefficient at quick changes becuase it relys on the engines RPM's to determine the flow going into the engine.
Both are accurate but the MAF is definitely quick at response time.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carletto
Engine Management
0
Jul 23, 2005 03:20 PM
RSEnigma
Engine/Power - non turbo (All non turbo Imprezas)
4
Feb 28, 2003 06:33 AM




