Thanks for the heads up, didn't know that because didn't want to read it again.

 

Annoying...

Didnt you point out that you were using an intentionally misguiding headline? That is the issue. I have no issue with the content because it is fabricated and baseless.

 

I wouldn't say it was misleading. If you do, than tell me how.
Plus must have some huge sack, pointing me towards a reference book. Oh, wait no you don't because you deleted that.

 

My earlier post was too pugnacious. I have noticed that you are quite the cynical beyotch ****-stirrer. Let the adults discuss things while you play with your He-Man figurines maggapacka.

Didnt think it was misleading? Didnt you just post this?


You also seem a little too excited about my huge sack... I will refrain from posting that title here on out.

 

I would be excited but alas, you don't have it because you punked out and edited. I'm asking for your opinion so I can understand where you are coming from and you are calling me names. Who's the man and who's the child?

 

Wow...considering the author of the article retracted the statement, and the only argument has been about forum decor/manors and symantics since we found that out, I'll do you both a favor by saying neither of you are childish normally but you both should stop posting at each other so you don't give other people the wrong idea about yourselfs...there, now neither of you has to 'backdown' to the other...

 

I'll relent... it has been a loooong day.



peace

Thanks MVWRX

speaking of champaigne, im unwinding with some cognac... hmmm, tasty