Wow, a retired Navy guy spray paints an Evo because of Pearl Harbor
12-07-2011, 10:07 PM
#31
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Under your bed, in your closet, and in your head
Posts: 15,425
Car Info: Corvette Z51
Last edited by Choku Dori; 12-07-2011 at 10:09 PM. Reason: Dammit, spelling!
12-07-2011, 10:28 PM
#32
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 22,776
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
Browsing the thread, the vet supposedly called the Evo owner a racial slur, spat on him, and shoved him. The Evo owner claims that he only hit the vet 4 times, and slammed the car door on his leg when he tried to scramble into his car. It'll be an interesting criminal AND civil case heh heh...
12-07-2011, 10:30 PM
#33
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,432
Car Info: 04.7 AW Time Attack STi
Who gives a **** about who's stupider... if there weren't laws/consequences for retaliating against perpetrators I know a lot of you would be agreeing with the EVO owner. I am currently on my 8th year of enlistment in the military AND I am Asian-American. This guy is a disgrace to veterans.
12-07-2011, 10:44 PM
#35
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Under your bed, in your closet, and in your head
Posts: 15,425
Car Info: Corvette Z51
I'm just glad that we drive "Subaru's" and not "Nakajima's".
12-07-2011, 10:46 PM
#36
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 22,776
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
What Jodice112 said. He caught the vet in the act, there was an exchange of words, vet shoved, he hit the vet, vet tried to escape back to his car, Evo owner slammed the door on the vet's leg. At least that's what the Evo guy said in his thread.
I'm just glad that we drive "Subaru's" and not "Nakajima's".
I'm just glad that we drive "Subaru's" and not "Nakajima's".
"I was in fear for my life."
12-07-2011, 10:53 PM
#37
But then again I'm not an attorney so what do I know.
12-07-2011, 10:57 PM
#39
1. The vet was damaging private property when he was confronted. (vandalism/ hate crime)
2. After being confronted the vet called the owner racial slurs. (all a hate crime)
3. The vet then spit on the owner and pushed him. (assault)
4. At that point the driver attempted to protect himself and broke the vet's nose. (self defense)
5. The vet tried to flee the scene of a crime and the driver stopped him from operating a vehicle by closing the door on him and broke his leg. The driver did not know if he was going for a weapon in the car and was protecting himself. (Self defense)
6. After the vet was under control, no more damage was done to him and there were no direct threats made to him and the police were called.
2. After being confronted the vet called the owner racial slurs. (all a hate crime)
3. The vet then spit on the owner and pushed him. (assault)
4. At that point the driver attempted to protect himself and broke the vet's nose. (self defense)
5. The vet tried to flee the scene of a crime and the driver stopped him from operating a vehicle by closing the door on him and broke his leg. The driver did not know if he was going for a weapon in the car and was protecting himself. (Self defense)
6. After the vet was under control, no more damage was done to him and there were no direct threats made to him and the police were called.
12-07-2011, 10:58 PM
#40
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 22,776
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
For the record, I'm not advocating the actions of the vet
Last edited by VRT MBasile; 12-07-2011 at 11:12 PM.
