Tomorrow is the Bluetooth law's first day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 10:40 AM
  #46  
UP2MTNS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 460
From: San Francisco
Car Info: 2004 Subaru WRX
Originally Posted by bluwrxwgn
Why would you have a phone up to your ear/mouth when you aren't using it? That's pretty plain and simple, if the phone is around that area, you are using it.

so if the gun is your hand you must have pulled the trigger? I know, dumb analogy but that's the basic point.....I can make up 100 reasons why I just 'happened' to pick up my phone while a cop randomly drives by and looks at me.

"it fell off my dashboard and onto the floor and was sliding around and was a distraction, officer, so I picked it up and....then you saw me."


burden of proof is on the cop. too many times people just pay tickets and assume you can't get out of it. Reasonable doubt isn't too hard to establish on something like this....you just have to have the ***** to go to court and argue with a cop. In this case, totally not worth your time for a $20 ticket or whatever.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:11 PM
  #47  
bluwrxwgn's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,074
From: BAIC Wagon Clique
Car Info: '02 WRB WRX Wagon
Originally Posted by UP2MTNS
so if the gun is your hand you must have pulled the trigger? I know, dumb analogy but that's the basic point.....I can make up 100 reasons why I just 'happened' to pick up my phone while a cop randomly drives by and looks at me.

"it fell off my dashboard and onto the floor and was sliding around and was a distraction, officer, so I picked it up and....then you saw me."


burden of proof is on the cop. too many times people just pay tickets and assume you can't get out of it. Reasonable doubt isn't too hard to establish on something like this....you just have to have the ***** to go to court and argue with a cop. In this case, totally not worth your time for a $20 ticket or whatever.
So you just happen to pick up your phone cause it's sliding around and you put it up to your ear after you pick it up just because you feel like it? You having the phone to your ear is my argument. Why in hell would any person have a cell phone, up to their EAR if they weren't talking on it. Having it in your hand is something different and wasn't my point.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #48  
kYLEMtnCRUZr's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 11,892
From: Hangin in Placerville youtube.com/rallydude1515
Car Info: 1999 RS Coupé- 1995 Mazda Miata -KTM 300
holding a phone to your ear has become a comfort blanket to some people, like a teddy bear lol. It does keep your ear warm, and promotes brain tumors.

Originally Posted by ipozestu
I washed my headset. Needless to say it doesn't work anmymore. Yesterday - bought one that clips on the visor. Speaker phone style. It's a moto. Works really well. Noise cancel, loud and clear. Best part it stays in the car, I don't have to worry about it sticking to my head or leaving it in my pocket.

Found it Moto T305
Nice i want that one.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #49  
ApexAssassin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 842
From: San Jose CA
Car Info: 2005 WRX STi, 1993 240sx (going under knife soon)
Originally Posted by Spoolin415
Pretty easily: cops word > over yours.
Yup. I saw the same thing on the news last night. ALl the cop has to do is see someone with a phone to their head, and they get a ticket. No contest.

Originally Posted by MyNikonLens
most of the drivers that talk on the phone while driving are women. i can't wait to see how many women will be pulled over for no hands-free.

i love this law.
Can we get some stats on this?


And only $20 for the first offense? That really oughta be raised at least %500.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:53 PM
  #50  
cal's Avatar
cal
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,753
From: SF
Car Info: 03
Originally Posted by splinter
+1 for speakerphone im not buying a stupid earpiece thinger ma bob...sux if your under 18 you cant use phones period not even bluetooth
how can they even enforce this?

"Sorry maam, you looked under 18."

Name:  Pedo20bearcopy1.jpg
Views: 19
Size:  9.5 KB
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #51  
bluwrxwgn's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,074
From: BAIC Wagon Clique
Car Info: '02 WRB WRX Wagon
I heard there was a study done by the LA Times that found that people using Bluetooth ear pieces drive just as bad as when they have the phone to their ear. So we'll just have to wait a couple months and see if there is a difference on the freeways with accidents and crap.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #52  
UP2MTNS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 460
From: San Francisco
Car Info: 2004 Subaru WRX
Originally Posted by bluwrxwgn
So you just happen to pick up your phone cause it's sliding around and you put it up to your ear after you pick it up just because you feel like it? You having the phone to your ear is my argument. Why in hell would any person have a cell phone, up to their EAR if they weren't talking on it. Having it in your hand is something different and wasn't my point.
you're missing my point.....I don't care if you're holding a giant cell phone from 1985 and calling the cop who's driving next to you and saying 'look, I'm on a cell phone'....

You can get out of speeding tickets when you are CAUGHT going 80 in a 65 on radar....if you request to see the officer's training record (they're required to have 24hrs of training on the device) and the officer doesn't have it, you can request the charges be thrown out due to lack of evidence because the device was potentially not properly used.


My point is enforceability....cops can give you tickets for whatever.....you can also get out of any ticket too, if you know your rights and don't mind going to court and finding a way out of it.

I find this 'law' to be pretty easy to get out of if you really want to put in the effort.

so yeah...phone up to your ear? sure, you probably are using it....and the cop will probably give you a ticket.....but I bet at least 50% of the time you could pretty easily go to court and ask a few key questions to the cop and put in enough reasonable doubt to the judge to have him dismiss it.


but for a $20 ticket, what's the point...
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #53  
chinoyboi's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,493
From: Hercules CA
Car Info: 03 WRX --> 07 STI --> 10 Cayman S
Have a plantronics voyager. Works fairly well, buttons are a little hard to handle, but works 100000000 times better than any motorolla bluetooth. I think I have some extra Plantronic voyagers lying around my house, but I have to look first. I'll post an update
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 01:24 PM
  #54  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
What people need to keep in mind is, like so many other laws, this one is more of an optional check box for a cop. Like, now they can use it as a reason for having pulled someone over but it most likely won't be the SOLE reason each time or even for the majority of them. Seems like it will be linked such as "you were weaving all over the place and your left tire crossed the solid line (crime) and you were on the phone (drives the point home since at this point, this crime is the reason for the previous ones).

I still have no idea why people sport around with a bluetooth thing in their ear all the time. It seems like some older people think of it like a fashion statement or something. It seriously makes people look retarded. I have one, and I use it every once in a while but take it off ASAP. Haha..

Personally though, I have always HATED being on the phone whilst driving regardless of a headset or not. It's stupid and SO distracting. Texting is even worse since your vision is pulled away as well. I usually commute on my bike tho so being on the phone isn't even an option. My other cars are mostly too loud to carry on a conversation. Currently daily driving a '72 Z28 with a 383 and turndowns so you really need to shout to speak to the passenger. Keeps it safer.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #55  
ipozestu's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,570
From: Subabrew Crew
Car Info: Broken Subarus
Jacob you have waaaaay too many cars
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 02:14 PM
  #56  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by ipozestu
Jacob you have waaaaay too many cars
Haha.. Working on it, sold the R32. I actually am talking to a buddy about potentially trading the 327 powered 240Z for a bugeye sedan. I am told that would be stupid, but who knows.

I wish I could say this particular badassmobile is mine but I am just babysitting it for a few weeks.

Old Jul 1, 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #57  
ipozestu's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,570
From: Subabrew Crew
Car Info: Broken Subarus
That it nice. A bit on the impractical side, nice none the less... Any under hood shots.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #58  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by ipozestu
That it nice. A bit on the impractical side, nice none the less... Any under hood shots.
Got to fill up every 2-3 days with my nutty 30mi round trip commute. I will shoot some underhood shots later today. Had some issues under the hood and need to clean a couple things up first.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #59  
MyNikonLens's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,781
From: mobile home
Car Info: Porsche 911 GT3
today i saw 3 men and 1 woman using their phones by hand and not hands-free. i wish i was a copy. one of the men was such a jerk all over the road.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 04:00 PM
  #60  
Lboogie's Avatar
banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,456
From: NorCal, SF East Bay
Car Info: 2007 WRX Limited | vf43'D
Law Enforcement Vs. Revenue Generation



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:54 PM.