New turbo engines from Subaru

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 06:11 AM
  #1  
G_Ride's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
New turbo engines from Subaru

New Subaru Turbos Coming in 2012

This should be interesting.....
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 08:33 AM
  #2  
subie OCD's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,808
From: Concord
Car Info: 04 STi
SOA blog, over on NASIOC said the BRZ would not be getting a turbo.
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
Giibo's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,824
From: 650
Car Info: '14 Odyssey & '13 Prius
cliff notes:

Just the Facts:

* In 2012, Subaru will introduce two turbocharged variants of its latest-generation direct-injection four-cylinder boxer engine.
* One of the new versions of the FB engine architecture will be a 300-horsepower STI variant.
* The Subaru BRZ sports car will likely receive the turbo boxer engine, though not at launch.
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 09:03 AM
  #4  
Jodice112's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,334
From: San Jose, Ca
Car Info: '06 WRB STi
Just 300hp? Or is that a rough estimate?
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 09:09 AM
  #5  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Great? An entire engine re-design to make the same power, less torque (2.0l), and a whopping 2mpg. It really seems like Subaru is going backwards with this. We got the 2.5l here in the first place because they couldn't make the power/torque they wanted with a 2.0 on our crappy gas. While direct injection will help with this some, the 2.0 will never have the same torque potential of the 2.5. I'm not impressed with this decision personally.

-- Ed
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 09:44 AM
  #6  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by Jodice112
Just 300hp? Or is that a rough estimate?
300hp from 2.0L
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 09:47 AM
  #7  
CaliSuby's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,064
From: Watson,Kalifas!
Car Info: Un Carrito Que Hace Vrooom Phsss!
Why do Evos 2.0 make as much trq as our 2.5?

Last edited by CaliSuby; Sep 23, 2011 at 09:50 AM.
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 09:48 AM
  #8  
CaliSuby's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,064
From: Watson,Kalifas!
Car Info: Un Carrito Que Hace Vrooom Phsss!
no me gusta..
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 09:57 AM
  #9  
04GG's Avatar
If in doubt, FLAT OUT
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,046
From: Nor Cal SJ
Car Info: 2010 Hatch, 2011 Sedan
You'll notice that Subaru doesn't have a hybrid in the lineup. They still have to meet government restrictions on mileage fleet wide. The direct injected 2.0 NA motors get much better mileage than the 2.5, even though the give up torque and power to achiveve it. Because those motors will be likely what the turbos are based on, they will be smaller in size once again. It is a business thing and the consumer is the one who gets to suffer.

Last edited by 04GG; Sep 23, 2011 at 10:00 AM.
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 09:57 AM
  #10  
jdblock's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 888
From: norcal
Car Info: 2004 STI
The new engine was designed to avoid ringland failures. Subaru won't ever admit that though. I wonder how much say Toyota had in engineering the new engine.

It will be interesting how the power is delivered for sure. Seems like 9k redlines will be common practice in the future.
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 10:03 AM
  #11  
NorCalDC5's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,522
From: Santa Clara
Car Info: 2016 FXT
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
Great? An entire engine re-design to make the same power, less torque (2.0l), and a whopping 2mpg. It really seems like Subaru is going backwards with this. We got the 2.5l here in the first place because they couldn't make the power/torque they wanted with a 2.0 on our crappy gas. While direct injection will help with this some, the 2.0 will never have the same torque potential of the 2.5. I'm not impressed with this decision personally.

-- Ed
I have felt the same way about Subaru's reasoning behind anything they do with their *** backwards engine layouts. I ****ing hate Subaru.
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 10:14 AM
  #12  
brucelee's Avatar
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 19,930
From: www.gunatics.com
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
Originally Posted by NorCalDC5
I have felt the same way about Subaru's reasoning behind anything they do with their *** backwards engine layouts. I ****ing hate Subaru.
What do you drive one?
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 10:24 AM
  #13  
johndabrit's Avatar
Da Brit.
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,811
From: Bay Area, CA
Car Info: http://tinyurl.com/3vo4362
Originally Posted by NorCalDC5
I have felt the same way about Subaru's reasoning behind anything they do with their *** backwards engine layouts. I ****ing hate Subaru.
Think you may be on the wrong site there buddy..
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 10:31 AM
  #14  
STiWRX06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,279
From: CA
Car Info: "Shadow"
Originally Posted by EQ Tuning
Great? An entire engine re-design to make the same power, less torque (2.0l), and a whopping 2mpg. It really seems like Subaru is going backwards with this. We got the 2.5l here in the first place because they couldn't make the power/torque they wanted with a 2.0 on our crappy gas. While direct injection will help with this some, the 2.0 will never have the same torque potential of the 2.5. I'm not impressed with this decision personally.

-- Ed
^This, totally agree!
What about all the speculation on a tiny 1.6L turbo boxer engine in their next WRX/STi coming in 2013 to coincide with a WRC variant, a smaller, lighter, 2 dr hatchback with nice widebody sounds tight, but idk about that engine. If you think the torque would be lower in a 2.0L, i could just imagine the lack of it in this one. It would have to be hella supped up for a street version to at least make 300 hp/tq cuz the WRC rally car has alot of race stuff it would never have to achieve that. Seems like Subaru is losing it's touch with every passing year, i'll have to wait & see how everything pans out, i personally can't stand anything they've produced from 08-11 so far. F**k gas mileage & hybrids, i want speed, power, & racing style, the future automotive landscape sucks for enthusiasts like me!
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 10:34 AM
  #15  
STiWRX06's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,279
From: CA
Car Info: "Shadow"
Originally Posted by brucelee
What do you drive one?
I believe DC5 is an RSX, that's why.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:38 PM.