New Smog Law in 2013? No Tailpipe Readings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2012 | 03:50 PM
  #91  
OneManArmy's Avatar
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
California is leading the way in permitting the government to have more power than it truly does or should. For some reason this state feels like it's better to let them choose. I just don't get it. Letting 1% make the decisions for 99% is stupid.

The 99% movement is pretty stupid in a lot of way but I can support the ideal.
Old May 4, 2012 | 04:32 PM
  #92  
FXTbrah's Avatar
previously known as wrxBRAH
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,383
From: San Jose / Campbell
Car Info: 2004 FXT
Man Scarface was dead on..


In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women.
Old May 5, 2012 | 12:16 AM
  #93  
akdmx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,161
From: Bay Area/SB
Car Info: 02 WRX
old.guy,

You have succeeded (maybe, idk) in creating doom and gloom. Now tell us how you propose we get around the new BS.

Thanks,
-me
Old May 5, 2012 | 08:49 AM
  #94  
glider's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 751
From: South Bay
Car Info: 2011 STI Sedan
Originally Posted by wrxBRAH
California is money strapped. The BAR guys only change our smog program 5-7 years to justify keeping their jobs. You want to know what they do the rest of the time? Sit in air conditioned offices bsing around while doing 3 appointments a day for people they cited. Im still very skeptical of the whole checking ecu version in the smog checks.
I could actually see checking the ECU. I'm not an embedded systems programmer but it's possible they wouldn't have to do a gull compare, just the checksum on the code. If you change a single bit that would change, and you'd just need a database of code checksums on the test equipment. Also, if the checksum is generated by the ECU itself as a hardware function, based on whatever ROM has been loaded, then it'd be tricky to get around in software and we'd be back to changing ECU hardware.

Having said that, I don't know if there's any such function nor a standard interface for it in the OBD-II spec.
Old May 5, 2012 | 11:05 AM
  #95  
old.guy's Avatar
banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,669
From: 2006 Zero/sports Widebody
Car Info: 500+ whp Club
Originally Posted by akdmx
old.guy,

You have succeeded (maybe, idk) in creating doom and gloom. Now tell us how you propose we get around the new BS.

Thanks,
-me
Sorry man. Its better to be ready then to get caught with your pants down.

Originally Posted by glider
I could actually see checking the ECU. I'm not an embedded systems programmer but it's possible they wouldn't have to do a gull compare, just the checksum on the code. If you change a single bit that would change, and you'd just need a database of code checksums on the test equipment. Also, if the checksum is generated by the ECU itself as a hardware function, based on whatever ROM has been loaded, then it'd be tricky to get around in software and we'd be back to changing ECU hardware.

Having said that, I don't know if there's any such function nor a standard interface for it in the OBD-II spec.
That is the just of it. As far as checking the ecu they are only reading the checksum and the Cal ID

Even my Droid phone has a program called "Torque" It even scans the ecu and gives you a Vehical Manufacturer, Vin Code, OBD Protocol, and then Calibration ID, And this is just to name a few. It will even tell you how many ECU's the car has and what versions. Engine, Trans, Airbag and so on.

If my cell phone can pull that info and do it instantly using a blue tooth adapter. Guess what! The state can as well.

Like I said, They already have a data base of vehical manufacturer calibrations. They have to give those up when they get their emissions approval to sell the car.

Keep in mind that canbus is even faster then obdII and you might be able to get around it be swapping ecu's. But then you will have to get your new ECU programmed to your car at the dealer. Least for anyone with chips in their car keys.

Like I said. It will be interesting on how this gets handled. Will a reflash back to stock get you cleared? Or will California want you to buy a new un tampered with ECU?
This could also backfire big for the state as well. As it effects more then just Subaru owners. Every brand of car has some sort of tuner out there.

My post is about making people aware of a problem on the way. Not to scare everyone. I really think that the BAR, CARB and EPA were required to publish they sneeky B.S. since they are a public office.
None of this stuff is going to change until someone like us gets voted into office and is able to sand bag or make change. California is just way to far lost to get everyone person effected together to make a fight. Everyone has pretty much rolled over now days on this crap.

Last edited by old.guy; May 5, 2012 at 11:07 AM.
Old May 5, 2012 | 11:14 AM
  #96  
slow04wrx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,453
Originally Posted by old.guy
Sorry man. Its better to be ready then to get caught with your pants down.



That is the just of it. As far as checking the ecu they are only reading the checksum and the Cal ID

Even my Droid phone has a program called "Torque" It even scans the ecu and gives you a Vehical Manufacturer, Vin Code, OBD Protocol, and then Calibration ID, And this is just to name a few. It will even tell you how many ECU's the car has and what versions. Engine, Trans, Airbag and so on.

If my cell phone can pull that info and do it instantly using a blue tooth adapter. Guess what! The state can as well.

Like I said, They already have a data base of vehical manufacturer calibrations. They have to give those up when they get their emissions approval to sell the car.

Keep in mind that canbus is even faster then obdII and you might be able to get around it be swapping ecu's. But then you will have to get your new ECU programmed to your car at the dealer. Least for anyone with chips in their car keys.

Like I said. It will be interesting on how this gets handled. Will a reflash back to stock get you cleared? Or will California want you to buy a new un tampered with ECU?
This could also backfire big for the state as well. As it effects more then just Subaru owners. Every brand of car has some sort of tuner out there.

My post is about making people aware of a problem on the way. Not to scare everyone. I really think that the BAR, CARB and EPA were required to publish they sneeky B.S. since they are a public office.
None of this stuff is going to change until someone like us gets voted into office and is able to sand bag or make change. California is just way to far lost to get everyone person effected together to make a fight. Everyone has pretty much rolled over now days on this crap.
Damnit man, that is so discouraging.
Old May 5, 2012 | 11:33 AM
  #97  
glenspen's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,793
From: BAIC
Car Info: 05 WRX
Originally Posted by old.guy
None of this stuff is going to change until someone like us gets voted into office and is able to sand bag or make change.
old.guy for president?

He has my vote just on the basis of his stable of whips
Old May 7, 2012 | 10:50 AM
  #98  
thejordan's Avatar
Retired War Hero
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,201
From: california
Car Info: .gifs
Originally Posted by old.guy
And all new dealer ecu updates I am sure will have to go thru the BAR. I am surprised it is not already like that.
Surprised? Really? Auto manufacturers are much more concerned about their vehicles than dealing with the state when they already have all kinds of safety things to deal with. BAR is already a poorly managed, inefficient, understaffed operation, they're not going to be able to handle it, and taxpayers aren't going to pay for it.

People who run smog shops aren't going to bother with it, it'll cost them more time and money. Many smog shops don't even care about aftermarket mods as long as you pass the scanner and sniffer.

The only foreseeable thing that will ever happen is they tighten the ranges on the sniffer test and force auto manufacturers to raise their MPGs on newer cars.

Last edited by thejordan; May 7, 2012 at 10:52 AM.
Old May 7, 2012 | 12:58 PM
  #99  
old.guy's Avatar
banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,669
From: 2006 Zero/sports Widebody
Car Info: 500+ whp Club
Originally Posted by thejordan
Surprised? Really? Auto manufacturers are much more concerned about their vehicles than dealing with the state when they already have all kinds of safety things to deal with. BAR is already a poorly managed, inefficient, understaffed operation, they're not going to be able to handle it, and taxpayers aren't going to pay for it.

People who run smog shops aren't going to bother with it, it'll cost them more time and money. Many smog shops don't even care about aftermarket mods as long as you pass the scanner and sniffer.

The only foreseeable thing that will ever happen is they tighten the ranges on the sniffer test and force auto manufacturers to raise their MPGs on newer cars.
Have you even read the thread?
Old May 28, 2013 | 10:48 PM
  #100  
Jaytron's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 179
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2002 WRB GGA
Sorry to bump such an old thread, but has anyone smogged this year? Was it easier or harder to pass than in the past?
Old May 28, 2013 | 10:52 PM
  #101  
Heedz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Nobody likes the tuna here
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,779
From: Somewhere San Mateo County, Inside A 911 Ambulance
Car Info: 03 SRP WRX Street Class Prepped, 17 Chevy Duramax
Originally Posted by Jaytron
Sorry to bump such an old thread, but has anyone smogged this year? Was it easier or harder to pass than in the past?
With Star I think it maybe...
Old May 28, 2013 | 10:57 PM
  #102  
Jaytron's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 179
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2002 WRB GGA
Originally Posted by Heedz
With Star I think it maybe...
wat
Old May 28, 2013 | 11:31 PM
  #103  
Heedz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Nobody likes the tuna here
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,779
From: Somewhere San Mateo County, Inside A 911 Ambulance
Car Info: 03 SRP WRX Street Class Prepped, 17 Chevy Duramax
Originally Posted by Jaytron
wat
wut
Old May 28, 2013 | 11:36 PM
  #104  
Superusdm's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 383
From: Sacramento, CA
Car Info: 2003 WRX
Originally Posted by Heedz

wut
May be. Or maybe?
Old May 28, 2013 | 11:41 PM
  #105  
Heedz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Nobody likes the tuna here
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,779
From: Somewhere San Mateo County, Inside A 911 Ambulance
Car Info: 03 SRP WRX Street Class Prepped, 17 Chevy Duramax
Originally Posted by Superusdm
May be. Or maybe?
IDK?
or...
IDK?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:39 PM.