MR dropped this week
10-18-2004, 08:25 PM
#62
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pleasanton, CA
Posts: 1,952
Car Info: a prius, a miata, & 2 m3's
Originally Posted by Krinkov
yeah, my point wasnt the STI or EVO were any better than each other, only that their differences are so insignificant that trying to split hairs over tenths of a second or a couple feet braking is absurd, especially so if you plan to mod your car at all
its all driver at our level. i'm not worrying about shaving tenths of a second off my laptimes yet... i'm still shaving seconds off at Infineon and minutes off at Thunderhill LOL.
Sean
10-18-2004, 09:01 PM
#64
I <3 White Girls
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Danville, CA
Posts: 26,491
Car Info: E92 M3, E70, F32, E21
Originally Posted by ldivinag
just dont legally RACE or modify the MR in anyway... or say bye-bye to the warranty... lol....
10-18-2004, 09:15 PM
#65
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in a glass case of emotion.
Posts: 17,962
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Originally Posted by 02BlackWRX
not that its any different for subarus
10-18-2004, 11:37 PM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by samowrx
the mr is lighter than the regular evo. the frame is designed differently using lighter/less welds.
10-18-2004, 11:41 PM
#67
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in a glass case of emotion.
Posts: 17,962
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Originally Posted by razorlab
Wrong wrong wrong. Its heavier than the 05 normal non-sunroof EVO. by about 30lbs. It doesnt use different welds or a different frame. It has an aluminum roof and lighter wheels but the 6speed is heavier.
Furthermore the brit mag "EVO"(not an EVO mag, just a coincidence) said they prefered the 5 speed over the 6, meh.
10-18-2004, 11:43 PM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Krinkov
yeah, the reviews we all read about the 300lbs is for the JDM model C&D weighed it and its heavier than the standard EVO,
Furthermore the brit mag "EVO"(not an EVO mag, just a coincidence) said they prefered the 5 speed over the 6, meh.
Furthermore the brit mag "EVO"(not an EVO mag, just a coincidence) said they prefered the 5 speed over the 6, meh.
(http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMSA/j...jsp?t=exterior)I do agree about the 6speed too, but I have never enjoyed 6speeds much, I don't even like the 6speed in the STi, too much shifting, espically on track.
10-18-2004, 11:55 PM
#69
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in a glass case of emotion.
Posts: 17,962
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Originally Posted by razorlab
haha let's not start this again. (http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMSA/j...jsp?t=exterior)
I do agree about the 6speed too, but I have never enjoyed 6speeds much, I don't even like the 6speed in the STi, too much shifting, espically on track.
(http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMSA/j...jsp?t=exterior)I do agree about the 6speed too, but I have never enjoyed 6speeds much, I don't even like the 6speed in the STi, too much shifting, espically on track.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brucelee
Bay Area
31
12-31-2010 08:31 AM
