Licensing your dog in San Jose

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2011 | 07:42 PM
  #16  
dub599's Avatar
Identifier of i-Club members
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 679
From: bay area
Car Info: 2009 wrx
why pay $55 a year when you can just put a dog tag and have your dog chipped. thats like paying a fee for the right to own an animal. i dont live in san jose, but where i live there isnt a dog catcher that goes around, animals are found by people and turned into the animal rescue which is not city managed

Last edited by dub599; Sep 3, 2011 at 07:45 PM.
Old Sep 3, 2011 | 08:08 PM
  #17  
VRT MBasile's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 22,776
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
Originally Posted by dub599
why pay $55 a year when you can just put a dog tag and have your dog chipped. thats like paying a fee for the right to own an animal. i dont live in san jose, but where i live there isnt a dog catcher that goes around, animals are found by people and turned into the animal rescue which is not city managed
Please read the entire thread, it is not just a means of animal recovery. And yes, you do have to pay a fee to own a dog, the license! You don't just get to do whatever you want in this country
Old Sep 3, 2011 | 08:17 PM
  #18  
dub599's Avatar
Identifier of i-Club members
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 679
From: bay area
Car Info: 2009 wrx
Originally Posted by VRT MBasile
Please read the entire thread, it is not just a means of animal recovery. And yes, you do have to pay a fee to own a dog, the license! You don't just get to do whatever you want in this country
thanks i read every post personally i see no point in paying a yearly fee to own an animal. it is just a way for the city to take your money for stupid reasons. to me its like having to pay for a city building permit to install a ceiling fan where you use to just have a light. and if registering your animal isnt just a form of animal recovery, then what is the point, other than handing the city money?
Old Sep 3, 2011 | 10:42 PM
  #19  
XxSti05xX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,633
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 2015 Ford F-150 XLT FX4 Sports Package,SOLD-05 STi
To keep track of animal vaccinations. Preventive disease control?? Same reason you and I have a immunization record right?
Old Sep 3, 2011 | 10:48 PM
  #20  
VRT MBasile's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 22,776
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
Originally Posted by dub599
thanks i read every post personally i see no point in paying a yearly fee to own an animal. it is just a way for the city to take your money for stupid reasons. to me its like having to pay for a city building permit to install a ceiling fan where you use to just have a light. and if registering your animal isnt just a form of animal recovery, then what is the point, other than handing the city money?
Do you think the city runs on fairy dust and rainbows or something? People with dogs use things like sidewalks, rec trails, and parks to exercise their dogs. The city creates and maintains these things.

Not to mention the filing of the license paperwork and vaccine records as well as the archiving and storage of the information, be it hardcopy in a filing cabinet that had to be purchased and placed in a room in a building which had to be built and has to be maintained, or digitally on a computer/server which had to be purchased and needs to be maintained as well as supplied with power and stored in a room in a building which had to be built and has to be maintained

Last edited by VRT MBasile; Sep 3, 2011 at 10:58 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brucelee
Dumpster
54
Apr 5, 2011 09:05 PM
brucelee
Bay Area
18
Apr 21, 2010 10:35 AM
TurnWRX
Bay Area
21
Jul 5, 2007 07:02 PM
Imprezer
Bay Area
23
Nov 4, 2004 10:49 PM
BajaNut
Bay Area
6
May 14, 2004 08:12 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:26 PM.