K...I officially got an 97 Impreza 2 door!! I have questions!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 12:57 AM
  #46  
woocabin's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,184
From: Pleasanton /La Jolla
Car Info: 2005 Stg.2 Wrx
Originally Posted by verc
Why don't you just save up about $10,000 over the next couple years and sell your car and buy an STI? (assuming high mileage STIs will cost around $12-13k at that time). Then you get the brembos, you don't need to swap, you get a cool car w/ 400 horsepower with a couple mods tossed in, it's 7 years newer than your impreza, you get a 6 speed transmission, cool suspension and a cool interior, the newer and stiffer and better handling chassis, etc. etc.


Seriously, I want you to think about my proposition right now, and tell me why I'm wrong and you're right. If you can give me a good reason not to do what I just said in the paragraph above, by all means be my guest and mod/swap away...


No offense intended (honest), just trying to give you some food for thought.
haha i totally agree
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 03:24 AM
  #47  
giusepi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 122
From: Livermore CA
Car Info: 2008 STi
pho king already exists, its in oakland, u can see it from 880.

If you like the look of the older suby, then stick with what you like, having a better car that you don't like, doesnt make sense.
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 08:56 AM
  #48  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Originally Posted by joltdudeuc
GC's don't need anything other than stock size rotors for stopping force unless they have much more power (IE: swap).

With my RS rotors, axxis ultimates, stainless lines and fluid, on RA1 race tires, a professional driver COULD NOT get the brakes to fade at the race track.

So, any upgrade you do, just know that it's only for preference and not really any performance enhancement.
Gosh I don't want to step on any toes here, and I agree that a lot more research needs to be done by the OP before doing anything but... I find your comments and story to be quite odd, based on around 10 years of track experience. Most of my experience has been in light, underpowered cars and there has NEVER once been a point in time where I have thought that I had "too much" braking power. Simply saying that a car that only has 100hp so it doesn't need better brakes is... Wrong among other things. A competent driver in a low weight, 100hp car will carry much more speed than a novice driver in a car with 4x the powah. In this case it's the "lesser hp" car that is in greater need of braking power. That said, I do not think this is the case here.

I am sure your brakes are very nice, but "professional driver could not get the brakes to fade at the race track" hmmm... There is something wrong with that story - even without the RA1s in there. I can definitely imagine the brakes working very well, after my own experience with my '01 RS coupe w/ stock brakes + Porterfield R4-S pads, but "could not get them to fade" is a whole different ballgame, even without knowing which track, how many laps and how hard the driver was pushing the car.

For myself, I would go for the LGT setup up front most likely if I did another coupe. The Brembos are also very heavy - this is worthy of consideration. For a street-ONLY car, there is no need whatsoever to upgrade the brakes beyond a better pad compound. Talking about "going really low" and such makes it sound like bling factor rather than performance factor - so none of this even matters in that case!!
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #49  
darkonion's Avatar
Chicks dig me. April Fool's!
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,989
From: Fremont, CA
Car Info: 1997 Impreza, 2014 BRZ
Originally Posted by wombatsauce
Gosh I don't want to step on any toes here, and I agree that a lot more research needs to be done by the OP before doing anything but... I find your comments and story to be quite odd, based on around 10 years of track experience. Most of my experience has been in light, underpowered cars and there has NEVER once been a point in time where I have thought that I had "too much" braking power. Simply saying that a car that only has 100hp so it doesn't need better brakes is... Wrong among other things. A competent driver in a low weight, 100hp car will carry much more speed than a novice driver in a car with 4x the powah. In this case it's the "lesser hp" car that is in greater need of braking power. That said, I do not think this is the case here.

I am sure your brakes are very nice, but "professional driver could not get the brakes to fade at the race track" hmmm... There is something wrong with that story - even without the RA1s in there. I can definitely imagine the brakes working very well, after my own experience with my '01 RS coupe w/ stock brakes + Porterfield R4-S pads, but "could not get them to fade" is a whole different ballgame, even without knowing which track, how many laps and how hard the driver was pushing the car.

For myself, I would go for the LGT setup up front most likely if I did another coupe. The Brembos are also very heavy - this is worthy of consideration. For a street-ONLY car, there is no need whatsoever to upgrade the brakes beyond a better pad compound. Talking about "going really low" and such makes it sound like bling factor rather than performance factor - so none of this even matters in that case!!
I get my brakes to lock! WRX size front and rear. Locking = bad!

I didn't read through the thread, but... I should mention that the L fronts are 1-pots and smaller diameter rotors than the RS, and the rear is a drum. But yeah... My WRX size stuff at the track is... in many respects... excessive. Not to say that you shouldn't spend a little more on good quality pads, rotors, lines, and fluid. Anyways... not enough brakes is bad. Too much brake is bad, too!
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #50  
subaruwrx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 978
From: ur mom
Car Info: ugly piece of ****
Stock brakes fade bad. In just spirited driving, Ive experienced major fade on the stock brakes on all of my Subarus.

If you upgrade power first, just know that your stock brakes cant handle more than 3-4 120-0 hard stops in a row.
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 01:15 PM
  #51  
subaruwrx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 978
From: ur mom
Car Info: ugly piece of ****
Originally Posted by verc
Why don't you just save up about $10,000 over the next couple years and sell your car and buy an STI? (assuming high mileage STIs will cost around $12-13k at that time). Then you get the brembos, you don't need to swap, you get a cool car w/ 400 horsepower with a couple mods tossed in, it's 7 years newer than your impreza, you get a 6 speed transmission, cool suspension and a cool interior, the newer and stiffer and better handling chassis, etc. etc.


Seriously, I want you to think about my proposition right now, and tell me why I'm wrong and you're right. If you can give me a good reason not to do what I just said in the paragraph above, by all means be my guest and mod/swap away...


No offense intended (honest), just trying to give you some food for thought.
I purposely sought out a GF wagon (1996) because I like the body style and Ive always wanted one with an STi motor in it.

now I have it! I cant get that in a GG or later wagon, so I bought mine. It ws cheap, too.
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #52  
verc's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,150
From: Palo Alto
Car Info: GT35R, Meth
Originally Posted by subaruwrx
I purposely sought out a GF wagon (1996) because I like the body style and Ive always wanted one with an STi motor in it.

now I have it! I cant get that in a GG or later wagon, so I bought mine. It ws cheap, too.

Yeah, I know. That's basically the point of what I asked the guy - does he REALLY want a GC or is he just going the "start out cheap and get expensive later" route?

Cause I'm in that boat. I bought my bugeye brand new off the lot and spent a lot of money on it when a lot of bugeye owners on i-club traded for an STI. But I don't regret it now since aspen white bugeyes have become desirable to suby enthusiasts.

However ask me a few years ago and I definitely would have told you I regretted not saving up and trading for the STI.
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #53  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by wombatsauce
Gosh I don't want to step on any toes here, and I agree that a lot more research needs to be done by the OP before doing anything but... I find your comments and story to be quite odd, based on around 10 years of track experience. Most of my experience has been in light, underpowered cars and there has NEVER once been a point in time where I have thought that I had "too much" braking power. Simply saying that a car that only has 100hp so it doesn't need better brakes is... Wrong among other things. A competent driver in a low weight, 100hp car will carry much more speed than a novice driver in a car with 4x the powah. In this case it's the "lesser hp" car that is in greater need of braking power. That said, I do not think this is the case here.

I am sure your brakes are very nice, but "professional driver could not get the brakes to fade at the race track" hmmm... There is something wrong with that story - even without the RA1s in there. I can definitely imagine the brakes working very well, after my own experience with my '01 RS coupe w/ stock brakes + Porterfield R4-S pads, but "could not get them to fade" is a whole different ballgame, even without knowing which track, how many laps and how hard the driver was pushing the car.

For myself, I would go for the LGT setup up front most likely if I did another coupe. The Brembos are also very heavy - this is worthy of consideration. For a street-ONLY car, there is no need whatsoever to upgrade the brakes beyond a better pad compound. Talking about "going really low" and such makes it sound like bling factor rather than performance factor - so none of this even matters in that case!!
Are you seriously asking me wether I meant what I said? I know you aren't calling me a liar, but still, you think someone like me whos been around the boards for nearly a decade and has some level of driving skill would make such a statement just cause?

I asked him, after 15 laps straight laps if we needed to let the brakes cool down, and he laughed at me saying "WHY?! They're freaking unbelieveable, they aren't fading at all..."

My car is 130whp, at the time 2800lbs. on 235/40/17 RA-1s. Back at the Subydude track day in April of 07. Hot sunny day, afternoon. It was my first track day, I did a 2:24 in my car. He stepped in and on lap 3-5 was doing 2:15s....


But that's ok if you don't believe me. You're more than welcome to ask the driver himself.

http://www.grand-am.com/standings/index.cfm?series=k

His name is Christian Miller, he's on the Compass 360 Team.
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #54  
DatSTi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 51
From: !NorthernPartOfCalifornia!
Car Info: 05 STi
I already have a 05 STi completly stock. I am mainly going for looks. just want a good looking L. Brembos, BBS's lowered and thats it. Maybe down the line ill think about swaping it out if i get/find a good deal. This has just been made too big of a thing, I simply wanted to know what it would take and how much i was looking at and for some of you guys it turns out into a big lecture. I mentioned above that it was "Preference" that is all. Everyone has there own likes and dis-likes. Lets just get over it and move on, I just want Brembos, I do. You guys dont have to agree with me. Thanks to those who helped me and gave good info. Someone close this thread.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ross
Hawaii
30
Sep 24, 2009 10:50 AM
ryball
Sacramento & Reno
31
Oct 11, 2007 02:28 PM
slow04wrx
Bay Area
11
Sep 27, 2007 07:27 PM
Hell cat
Interior, Exterior & Lighting
1
Feb 20, 2003 10:10 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 PM.