HOW is there not an STi drool thread here yet?!
#17
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 998
Car Info: 2016 CWP WRX
YO JERRY
how is japan? how many cool cars you driven/seen/been in/drooled on?
pretty cool news the STi. it has been on my mind all damn day. i prety much got the thumbs up fromk the wife (YES!!!!) and just need to decide on when i want to get one (1st or second lot).
now the big choice is....
blue or silver???
josh
how is japan? how many cool cars you driven/seen/been in/drooled on?
pretty cool news the STi. it has been on my mind all damn day. i prety much got the thumbs up fromk the wife (YES!!!!) and just need to decide on when i want to get one (1st or second lot).
now the big choice is....
blue or silver???
josh
#18
Hello,
Josh: We all know Blue is faster.
All: Next thing you know, they'll bring this motor in the Forrester and the whole import business will be all upsidedown.
I'm with Chris and the i-Speed guys. I don't wish anyone to crash their new STi, but I smell motorswaps coming.
Joel
Josh: We all know Blue is faster.
All: Next thing you know, they'll bring this motor in the Forrester and the whole import business will be all upsidedown.
I'm with Chris and the i-Speed guys. I don't wish anyone to crash their new STi, but I smell motorswaps coming.
Joel
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Posts: 25
Car Info: 03 Silver WRX Wagon; 92 Mazda Protege
I can't believe people were thinking of going to Mitshubishi.
They are inferior.
Case in point:
We all know the 2003 Outlander is a Forester knockoff.
My brother has a 1999 Forester, which I've driven exstensively. I rented a 2003 Outlander (asked for a Subaru) for about 4 days. Ummm. It looked cool, I guess. Anemic engine, and somehow manages to get worse mileage than the Forester. Harsh ride. Other than that it's a pretty basic car (made from the Lancer). Oh yeah. The 2003 Outlander basically has five years on the design of my brother's Subaru. Couldn't it have been on par with his?
They are inferior.
Case in point:
We all know the 2003 Outlander is a Forester knockoff.
My brother has a 1999 Forester, which I've driven exstensively. I rented a 2003 Outlander (asked for a Subaru) for about 4 days. Ummm. It looked cool, I guess. Anemic engine, and somehow manages to get worse mileage than the Forester. Harsh ride. Other than that it's a pretty basic car (made from the Lancer). Oh yeah. The 2003 Outlander basically has five years on the design of my brother's Subaru. Couldn't it have been on par with his?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GT35 STI
Sacramento & Reno
403
04-11-2006 11:57 PM