Help! I need a gun, and info. Priority #1
#94
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 549
Car Info: Panty Buncher
Seems like a lot of you are saying the .357 is a good reliable choice. Obviously easy to navigate halls with it to.
How are glocks? and how pricey and reliable are they?
How are glocks? and how pricey and reliable are they?
#96
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 549
Car Info: Panty Buncher
#98
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 549
Car Info: Panty Buncher
jesus ****ing christ man, I said it was a known issue and the .357 is idiot and jam proof, y u mad? It's like this thread is full of the biggest bunch of insecure males ever.
Last edited by VTRZA; 01-07-2011 at 02:24 PM.
#100
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 186
Car Info: 2006 Aspen White STi
Jesus, the insecurity in this thread and forum is gigantic. The glock jamming due to limp wristing is a known issue and since this is supposed to be someones first gun without proper shooting technique it could be an issue. Light frames have a drawback.
#101
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Snatchin' your people up
Posts: 3,779
Car Info: Hilux Double Cab with a Dishka on top
I personally don't get the obsession with AR's. The open gas system on M1's, even mini 14's and 30's is far more reliable and if you're building the thing already accuracy shouldn't be an issue as well. The mini 14 with a har-bar I'd put within a 1/2" of a decent AR any day of the week if we're talkin .223 and clean it 1/2 as much. All for around $500
1. Ergonomics
2. Accuracy
3. Modularity
Not saying the Mini 14 is junk, but it's just not in the same league as an AR. Also IIRC, the Mini 30's will not feed steel cased x39 ammo. So you're actually better off with an SKS or AK in that situation too.
#102
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 549
Car Info: Panty Buncher
Let's see where the AR platform has the Mini 14 beat...
1. Ergonomics
2. Accuracy
3. Modularity
Not saying the Mini 14 is junk, but it's just not in the same league as an AR. Also IIRC, the Mini 30's will not feed steel cased x39 ammo. So you're actually better off with an SKS or AK in that situation too.
1. Ergonomics
2. Accuracy
3. Modularity
Not saying the Mini 14 is junk, but it's just not in the same league as an AR. Also IIRC, the Mini 30's will not feed steel cased x39 ammo. So you're actually better off with an SKS or AK in that situation too.
#103
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 4,300
Car Info: http://kiva.org/invitedby/brett4254
There is absolutely nothing wrong with Glock's. They are well proven guns with extremely hi quality-control. You have to spend twice the money to get a semi-auto you could honestly say was better.
Personally, I've never liked the feel of Glock... grip angle is wrong (for me) and the trigger feels notchey. But that's personnel preference. I like the Springfield XD's feel better myself; but the design is very similar.
Personally, I've never liked the feel of Glock... grip angle is wrong (for me) and the trigger feels notchey. But that's personnel preference. I like the Springfield XD's feel better myself; but the design is very similar.
#105
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
There is absolutely nothing wrong with Glock's. They are well proven guns with extremely hi quality-control. You have to spend twice the money to get a semi-auto you could honestly say was better.
Personally, I've never liked the feel of Glock... grip angle is wrong (for me) and the trigger feels notchey. But that's personnel preference. I like the Springfield XD's feel better myself; but the design is very similar.
Personally, I've never liked the feel of Glock... grip angle is wrong (for me) and the trigger feels notchey. But that's personnel preference. I like the Springfield XD's feel better myself; but the design is very similar.