View Poll Results: What size wheels do you have now?
17s
60.92%
18s
14.94%
19s
0
0%
16s
20.69%
15s
0
0%
14s
3.45%
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll

Do you have 17" or 18" wheels?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 02:29 PM
  #76  
AntiochCali's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,504
From: Leg Humper
Car Info: '03 WRX wagon, faster than walkin'
Originally Posted by sireatalot
hmmm sounds good.. but still not convinced. in theory, I can see why that would make sense though. However... being that the tires have to match the diameter of the stockers, wouldn't that make the mass consistent to the formula? Rotational mass isn't really affected is it? I mean, unless the tire is wider... giving the tire more friction on the road. So having the tire being the same diameter as the stock one (something to do with the ECU and the differential?) the center of mass shouldn't be different because it's not changing the diameter of the lug patterns. in other words.. it's all the same, but the wheel is bigger and the tires are skinnier. make any sense? oh well
You are correct in that the diameter is the same, but the rims generally outweigh the tire by a significant ammount.

Note: Mechanical advantage = length from center to outter most diameter, by installing larger wheels that move a heavier mass farther from the center you are increasing the resistance to acceleration. Actually it is the resistance to change - but you probably don't care about semantics.

Your hypothosis would be correct IF the weight of the rim and tire were evenly distributed along the entire radius, it isn't. Rims weigh more and especially on light rims, most of the weight is at the farthest point away from the hub as it can be.

If you get the chance to drive two identical cars one with say 15" wheels and one with 18" wheels, this becomes very apparent, as long as they are both good rims and not super heavy like steelies. Lots of Honda and BMW Mini drivers find this out.

good luck.
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 06:36 PM
  #77  
Group B's Avatar
Dahveed aka Robin Hood
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,793
From: Robbin' the Hood (Claycord)
Car Info: (RIP) '04 STi Silver
If looks were all that mattered, I'd have some 18x8/8.5 Volk CE28Ns on my STi.

For the money it pays to have 17s, as the tires are much cheaper.

Plus my car is stiff enough on the street, I don't need it to be much rougher.

I hate that my STi wheels are only 7.5" wide, so I will get some CE28Ns in 17x8/8.5 in the future.
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 10:56 AM
  #78  
sireatalot's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,674
From: El Cerrito, CA
Car Info: 2014 Mazda MX-5 GT PRHT
I'm thinking about getting the 17's now. Seems like it's cheaper and just about as good as the 18's. Although, Im not going to race my car anytime soon, It's good to know that there are all these options. thanks guys I'll try to get 17" x 11.5 hehe I was just kidding.
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 01:11 PM
  #79  
sireatalot's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,674
From: El Cerrito, CA
Car Info: 2014 Mazda MX-5 GT PRHT
Alrighty... I did a little tire shopping... Yeah.. they can get pretty expensive... but the ones I've seen were about 100 bux at tirerack... They're only about 10 dollars more for the 18s.. so what gives?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brucelee
Bay Area
60
Apr 26, 2007 09:16 PM
sireatalot
Bay Area
31
Sep 30, 2004 04:10 PM
obyone
Mid-West
4
Nov 29, 2002 01:55 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:06 PM.