CATLESS? Be warn'd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2004 | 10:48 PM
  #46  
sireatalot's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,674
From: El Cerrito, CA
Car Info: 2014 Mazda MX-5 GT PRHT
huh nugget? wha?
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 01:09 AM
  #47  
Group B's Avatar
Dahveed aka Robin Hood
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,793
From: Robbin' the Hood (Claycord)
Car Info: (RIP) '04 STi Silver
Originally Posted by SubyFi
Beginning January 1, 2005, vehicles six model years old or newer will be exempt from the smog-check requirement and will be assessed a $12 annual smog-abatement fee. The additional revenue will fund the Moyer Program, which subsidizes emission-reduction programs for high-polluting diesel engines such as locomotives, ships, large trucks, and agricultural equipment. The goal of the program is laudable, but the Auto Club opposed the proposal because charging motorists who drive newer vehicles to clean up highly polluting industrial diesel engines violates the state's constitution.

Also effective January 1, 2005, vehicles four years old or newer will be exempt from the change-of-ownership smog-check requirement and its attendant fee. Instead, their owners will be assessed an additional $8 transfer fee. This change will increase state revenues without increasing overall costs for motorists. Revenues will help the Bureau of Automotive Repair pay for the costs of administering the Smog Check program. The Auto Club did not oppose this change.
These two things are major...

But yeah, like I've been saying all along, it shouldn't take a DMV funded "Moyer Program" to clean other sources for polution, but what about factories and the other sources...

It's typical Kali, look we pay for our roads to get maintained and they find a way not to maintain them, and Northridge repairs its freeways after a quake, but stupid San Francisco still hasn't upgraded its freeways since the '89 quake, even though Sales Tax hikes were introduced solely to cover those expenses...
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 02:33 AM
  #48  
ldivinag's Avatar
03.23.67 - 06.14.13
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,495
From: N37 39* W122 3*
Originally Posted by GotBoost?
POOF, the thing spits out all kinds of isht out the tailpipe. I am like to them, because that is a blatant gross polluter, but is smog exempt because its a city truck.....WTF? Talk about a double standard.

lol... next time, call 1-800-EXHAUST and report their license plate...
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 11:21 AM
  #49  
Racenut's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,138
From: Monterey Bay, Ca
Car Info: WR Blue Wagon
Originally Posted by SubyFi
Beginning January 1, 2005, vehicles six model years old or newer will be exempt from the smog-check requirement and will be assessed a $12 annual smog-abatement fee. The additional revenue will fund the Moyer Program, which subsidizes emission-reduction programs for high-polluting diesel engines such as locomotives, ships, large trucks, and agricultural equipment. The goal of the program is laudable, but the Auto Club opposed the proposal because charging motorists who drive newer vehicles to clean up highly polluting industrial diesel engines violates the state's constitution.
So we won't be due for a smog check till the car is 6 years old? SWEET!!! Two extra years till I have to put the OEM DP back on for inspection
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 11:45 AM
  #50  
titsataki's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 513
From: The Nutmeg State
Car Info: 05 Impreza CGM
Man just in case anyone had any doubts that they are looking for money rather than checking on the polution levels.

No need to pass emissions just pay a smog abatement fee

Nick


Originally Posted by SubyFi
Just a heads up

Until January 1, 2005, private passenger vehicles registered in urbanized areas of California are required to submit a smog certificate every other year at the time of vehicle registration; vehicles four model years old or newer are exempt, and their owners pay a $6 annual smog-abatement fee instead.

Beginning January 1, 2005, vehicles six model years old or newer will be exempt from the smog-check requirement and will be assessed a $12 annual smog-abatement fee. The additional revenue will fund the Moyer Program, which subsidizes emission-reduction programs for high-polluting diesel engines such as locomotives, ships, large trucks, and agricultural equipment. The goal of the program is laudable, but the Auto Club opposed the proposal because charging motorists who drive newer vehicles to clean up highly polluting industrial diesel engines violates the state's constitution.

Also effective January 1, 2005, vehicles four years old or newer will be exempt from the change-of-ownership smog-check requirement and its attendant fee. Instead, their owners will be assessed an additional $8 transfer fee. This change will increase state revenues without increasing overall costs for motorists. Revenues will help the Bureau of Automotive Repair pay for the costs of administering the Smog Check program. The Auto Club did not oppose this change.
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #51  
Racenut's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,138
From: Monterey Bay, Ca
Car Info: WR Blue Wagon
Originally Posted by titsataki
Man just in case anyone had any doubts that they are looking for money rather than checking on the polution levels.

No need to pass emissions just pay a smog abatement fee

Nick
I'd rather pay the extra $6 a year and not have to mess with my exhaust and smog check man for another 2 years
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 07:57 AM
  #52  
kidatari's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,281
From: NH
Car Info: Rust and Salt
I (heart) California.

This is why I will never be a resident of here, and why I register my cars in MD. I love a state that's still in a budget crisis, yet all it can focus on is car emissions, and not refurbishing schools, etc. I'm hoping the military approves my request to go to Las Vegas. Bah.

Oh, and as said earlier, thanks democrats.
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 08:06 AM
  #53  
titsataki's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 513
From: The Nutmeg State
Car Info: 05 Impreza CGM
Originally Posted by Racenut
I'd rather pay the extra $6 a year and not have to mess with my exhaust and smog check man for another 2 years
Oh I am with you here. I would pay $50 a year so I would not have to deal with the hassle to reinstall etc... I am just dissapointed that the highest priority is to tax California citizens and not the air quality.

On the other hand I see that the Meca of the tuners and mods is Southern CA. Or this is not right?

Cheers

Nick
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 08:46 AM
  #54  
sireatalot's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,674
From: El Cerrito, CA
Car Info: 2014 Mazda MX-5 GT PRHT
When I went to LA.. I didn't see any tuned cars. They were all regular Bentleys and Mercedes. Those *******s don't know how to drive. Anyway... Does that mean that if you bought an 04, you wouldn't have to get a smog check anymore but just pay the bill and that's it?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wrexman
Used Aftermarket Car Parts For Sale
8
Jul 30, 2005 01:40 PM
Kroger
Ongoing Projects
5
Feb 16, 2005 11:45 PM
Max Xevious
Sacramento & Reno
9
Dec 13, 2004 02:38 PM
MCMunroe
Interior, Exterior & Lighting
14
Mar 13, 2004 10:35 AM
Steppin Razor
Bay Area
1
May 6, 2003 05:23 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:58 PM.