AIG needs more money... WTF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 05:45 AM
  #31  
Krinkov's Avatar
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 17,962
From: in a glass case of emotion.
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Originally Posted by I<3subie
I can tell you I am not happy with people when they have to get bailed out of their house loan. They knew the risk when signing for it.

So all us home owners that pay on time should default and have our uncle pick up the tab.

I think all this home owners and bad companies..... You pay to play.. You want to play..... Then you need to pay.. If paying means failures and loss of house or bankrupt? Well thats your own fault for putting yourself in that spot.
95% of us know right from wrong! You chose wrong.... I dont want my tax money bailing your *** out.

oh I agree with you 100%, these idiots that belivede the lenders that told them it didnt matter that they were in over their head because the houses value would continue to rise are just as fault. In the end, theres alot of fault to go around, and thats the problem. Fault can be easily avoided if there are RULES to this whole game.
Hell, you have to comply to more regulations to sell a loaf of bread in this country than to run a bank! And thats probably the best example. Say we had no health departments, no FDA, and we sold food in this country the same way we ran our economy. I could put poison in my bread, and the 'market adjustment' would be, if enough people died, sooner or later, people would stop buying my bread. Sounds crazy, but when you bring up the idea of bringing in any more financial regulation, fiscal conservatives (ie, the rich) act like it might as well be the last step toward socialism, though they dont mind socialism when it comes to bailing out their banks!

dammit, this is all pissing me off, going to bed...
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #32  
iLoqin's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
Originally Posted by Krinkov
oh I agree with you 100%, these idiots that belivede the lenders that told them it didnt matter that they were in over their head because the houses value would continue to rise are just as fault. In the end, theres alot of fault to go around, and thats the problem. Fault can be easily avoided if there are RULES to this whole game.
Hell, you have to comply to more regulations to sell a loaf of bread in this country than to run a bank! And thats probably the best example. Say we had no health departments, no FDA, and we sold food in this country the same way we ran our economy. I could put poison in my bread, and the 'market adjustment' would be, if enough people died, sooner or later, people would stop buying my bread. Sounds crazy, but when you bring up the idea of bringing in any more financial regulation, fiscal conservatives (ie, the rich) act like it might as well be the last step toward socialism, though they dont mind socialism when it comes to bailing out their banks!

dammit, this is all pissing me off, going to bed...
I believe it was the Clinton Administration that took off that rule as real estate personnel wanted more leeway for less boring business. That allowed these ninja loans to rise and all these houses and mortgages to be dumped into riskier business. At that time, obviously it made it look like the the Clinton era created more jobs (and it did with all these people seeing how easy it was to go into the real estate business) but now we are seeing the bubble burst... I am a democrat but partly where this started was those rules the Clinton era lifted off the housing market.
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 11:38 AM
  #33  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
As others have mentioned, but I'll say it again, Clinton was the best republican democrat president we've ever had.

In fact he signed off on more republican penned legislation that even Ronald Reagan did in his 2 terms in office.

Blaming democrats for things Clinton signed off on is kind of like blaming Jews in Germany for what the ****'s did.
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #34  
iLoqin's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
Originally Posted by psoper
Blaming democrats for things Clinton signed off on is kind of like blaming Jews in Germany for what the ****'s did.
This crisis isn't built on just 1 incident, it's built on all these other things going around, and in part Clinton did it too. If anyone is to blame, it's all the businesses who thought they were capitalizing on the market, along with the lift of that regulation. People are crying on here about the rules and regulations, the one that signed the bill was Clinton, he did part of this job just as the banks did their job at making all this money. A lot of people are to blame, not just one. I wouldn't necessarily say that's jews and ****'s as your metaphor.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FW Motorsports
Teh Politics Forum
5
Mar 20, 2009 04:27 PM
I<3subie
Bay Area
8
Oct 9, 2008 10:26 AM
sykosis
Hawaii
17
Feb 10, 2005 07:13 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 PM.