AIG needs more money... WTF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 05:29 PM
  #16  
I<3subie's Avatar
Thread Starter
banned
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,746
From: Walnut Creek Ca..
Car Info: heel'n toe da hoe...
Damn they must really suck to get fired twice in a month....
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #17  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by I<3subie
....... 1926-30's here we come... Stock market going into the 6000 range....
We should start a pool, I'd put money that we don't see bottom until about 3500 on the DJIA




Originally Posted by I<3subie
And we all are going to die....
I remember one point in econ class when they talked about policy and government intervention, how this leads to that and so on, but in the end "we are all dead anyway".

Economics is pretty much sh** science anyway



Originally Posted by I<3subie
Time to panic.... Panic Panic
well that is one alternative....
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #18  
I<3subie's Avatar
Thread Starter
banned
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,746
From: Walnut Creek Ca..
Car Info: heel'n toe da hoe...
Originally Posted by psoper
We should start a pool, I'd put money that we don't see bottom until about 3500 on the DJIA
I have a huge nest egg waiting for the 3500.... What ever is left standing I'll buy.. They at that point seem to know what they are doing.. So I'll buy their stock..

I think we should just let this **** drop, Least then we will cut out a few months of watching it sink slow.

So as we hit bottom we can then dump money and rebuild.
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 09:36 PM
  #19  
Krinkov's Avatar
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 17,962
From: in a glass case of emotion.
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Originally Posted by psoper

OK, in a pinch- hangin' will suffice



++++1000000

and after the hangings, better regulation. funny how after this all went down you hear about all the people that were blowing whistles about it but nobody listened to them.

but hey, in case the bailout doesnt work, lets just throw more tax cuts at the problem, thats always worked in the past right???

Last edited by Krinkov; Feb 23, 2009 at 09:38 PM.
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 09:46 PM
  #20  
vodka's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,610
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Car Info: 4日本車
Originally Posted by Krinkov
++++1000000

and after the hangings, better regulation. funny how after this all went down you hear about all the people that were blowing whistles about it but nobody listened to them.

but hey, in case the bailout doesnt work, lets just throw more tax cuts at the problem, thats always worked in the past right???
+1000000000 for good old killin'. F' spending our dollars putting them up in some golf resort prison for ceo's. Cheaper, and more effective for scaring any would-be execs wanting to follow in their footsteps. Plenty of gun carriers on i-crub. Let's make with the firing squad.
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 10:29 PM
  #21  
evsoul's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,588
From: Santa Rosa
Car Info: 2005 Unicorn
Originally Posted by I<3subie
Let them fail.... Someone else better will fill the void.


If your bad.... You fail... When you fail.. Some other company will spring up and take it over. Tossing money at a bad thing is not very smart. Do they have Bernie Madoff handing out government money?
They should be handing this trillon dollars out to the people of the u.s. and let the consumer spend it. Thats direct market cash infusion, saving thousands of jobs. Going Bernie Madoff with it all is not going to work. Everyone has their hands out now.

Ah well ....... 1926-30's here we come... Stock market going into the 6000 range....
And we all are going to die.... Time to panic.... Panic Panic
totally agree..

giving money to them in the first place was dumb, let alone giving them more.
it's like repairing a sinking ship to prolong its sinking process.. just for it to sink eventually before it makes it back to a safe harbor.

no point in prolonging the inevitable when it's coming out of our pockets. let the FDIC pay them out, and let's count our losses now while they are still... reasonable? not sure that word applies so much anymore.
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #22  
evsoul's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,588
From: Santa Rosa
Car Info: 2005 Unicorn
we are a republic, not a socialist country... if you cannot stay a float, then you need to sink. but either way welcome to the new USA... aka the USS... united states of socialism.
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 11:17 PM
  #23  
Krinkov's Avatar
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 17,962
From: in a glass case of emotion.
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Originally Posted by psoper
We should start a pool, I'd put money that we don't see bottom until about 3500 on the DJIA






I remember one point in econ class when they talked about policy and government intervention, how this leads to that and so on, but in the end "we are all dead anyway".

Economics is pretty much sh** science anyway





well that is one alternative....
Glad you responded Pete. One thing in that video they didnt address was the fact thet there WERE responsible banks that saw all of this but their own investors would see the profit the other banks were claiming (hypothetical) from these toxic assets, and the investors were asking, why arent you showing these same returns?? even though they didnt understand the real risk those others were taking on! so just to stay competitive alot of banks and IB firms HAD to follow them down this monkey-see monkey-do route and hope for the best or else wave bye-bye to they're investors. this is where government regulation WORKS. I dont care what those 100% free market cheerleaders say, what we have here is EXACTLY what happens when you have a laissez faire economy. The free market only adjust reactionary,when its too late and now you have to fix the mess they caused.
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 11:28 PM
  #24  
I<3subie's Avatar
Thread Starter
banned
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,746
From: Walnut Creek Ca..
Car Info: heel'n toe da hoe...
Control my bank.....
Control my House
Control my wife
Control my what ever

Just keep your government hands off my car and whats under the hood...
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 11:52 PM
  #25  
04subaruwrx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 390
From: San Francisco
Car Info: 2004 Subaru WRX
Who's gonna be the next Madoff?
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 01:53 AM
  #26  
ldivinag's Avatar
03.23.67 - 06.14.13
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,495
From: N37 39* W122 3*
Originally Posted by evsoul
we are a republic, not a socialist country... if you cannot stay a float, then you need to sink. but either way welcome to the new USA... aka the USS... united states of socialism.
who'd you vote for again?
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 02:20 AM
  #27  
iLoqin's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,826
From: No Way
Car Info: Nadda
Originally Posted by ldivinag
who'd you vote for again?
Wouldn't have mattered who you voted for. The process was already rollin', the president wouldn't have made much of a call. The treasury is there for somethin.
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 02:47 AM
  #28  
Krinkov's Avatar
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 17,962
From: in a glass case of emotion.
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Originally Posted by ldivinag
who'd you vote for again?
in this case, I dont think any sides got it right, regardless of whos prescription you subscribe to. We've been riding on trickle down economics and Greenspan's policy of lower interests rates since Regan (yes Clinton's guilty too, Im not targeting) where lower interest rates and lower taxes will solve everything, but it just led to a debt-culture thats based on imaginary assets.
During the first sub-prime mortgage/credit crisis bailout last year under Bush where we basically dropped money out of a helicopter over wall street to get them to loosen up their lending, we just 'hoped' they would pay us back. I thought, well if we were just going to throw away (literally) $700B why not just start a fund for these folks that are about to default on their sub prime loans to pay back their mortgages for a year or two. that way, people stay in their homes, property values dont drop due to foreclosures, and the banks still get their money. yes it still sucks in the short term, but if we've already committed to bailing out anyone at any level, why wouldn't it be the homeowners? The way its set up now, only the banks get any protection.

In fact, Ive heard alot more animosity to people that are going to default getting relief than the big banks that are already getting relief, and I can only assume its because regular people can relate to other people like them getting something for nothing than these big banks getting it that is just as bad but they really cant get their head around it because giving money to the big companies for nothing just "sounds okay I guess" but its the same goddamn thing!!!.

Seriously, its all bad, and to a certain degree, its going to take some spending to get us out of this AND tax relief. But it wasnt high taxes that got us into this, and tax cuts wont get us out of this, we need to have more regulation and oversight of our banking/finance industry. like I said before, the biggest problem with our laissez-faire free market economy is that all adjustments are reactionary, not proactive. Problems arent ironed out subtly and progressively as things progress, but only after all hells broken loose and it needs to get bailed ot before it goes belly up. I dont care what any of you free-market heads say,
THEY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE ENOUGH TO REGULATE THEM SELVES, THEY NEED REGULATION!!!!
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 02:48 AM
  #29  
Krinkov's Avatar
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 17,962
From: in a glass case of emotion.
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Originally Posted by ldivinag
who'd you vote for again?
BTW, Im not sure where you were going with that with greg, but he's a single-issue voter like you so I know he didnt vote for Obama
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 03:01 AM
  #30  
I<3subie's Avatar
Thread Starter
banned
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,746
From: Walnut Creek Ca..
Car Info: heel'n toe da hoe...
I can tell you I am not happy with people when they have to get bailed out of their house loan. They knew the risk when signing for it.

So all us home owners that pay on time should default and have our uncle pick up the tab.

I think all this home owners and bad companies..... You pay to play.. You want to play..... Then you need to pay.. If paying means failures and loss of house or bankrupt? Well thats your own fault for putting yourself in that spot.
95% of us know right from wrong! You chose wrong.... I dont want my tax money bailing your *** out.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:26 AM.