2015 WRX vs STI DynoTests
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Salinas
Posts: 1,502
Car Info: 2003 WRX Wagon EJ25
2015 WRX vs STI DynoTests
Dyno tested: 2015 Subaru WRX vs. 2015 Subaru WRX STI - Road & Track
Pretty interesting to see how different the powerbands are between the FA and EJ. Looks like the WRX needs a good tune? Its a torque monster and then falls flat up high. Might be the turbo running out of steam?
Thoughts? Opinions? Insight?
Pretty interesting to see how different the powerbands are between the FA and EJ. Looks like the WRX needs a good tune? Its a torque monster and then falls flat up high. Might be the turbo running out of steam?
Thoughts? Opinions? Insight?
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Union City
Posts: 50
Car Info: 16' R, 14' WRX, 04' MSM
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
This STI also has unequal headers, which means it retains the trademark boxer sound. Why not equal-length headers like in the new WRX? According to Subaru engineers, it would be more cost effective to simply increase the WRX’s FA-series motor to 2.5-liters. For now, however, STI drivetrain still serves up an epic dose of boxer rumble.
2015 Subaru WRX STI Driven and Reviewed | Driving Sports TV
Edit: funny...my post #13 here was WAY later in real time than #14, but jumped ahead. I broke the interwebz.
Last edited by oaklandish_WRX; 02-25-2014 at 04:41 PM. Reason: time travel
#14
Yeah Subaru done away with the unequal length going forward per a CEO interview with road and track (I think it was them lol) but they said they'd rather competitive performance vs aesthetics 2015+
Both models I believe
Both models I believe