18x8 + 35 RPF1 + suspension Q
#16
banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: 2006 Zero/sports Widebody
Posts: 1,669
Car Info: 500+ whp Club
From the meaty tire thread...
2002 WRX wagoon with 17x8.5 ET48 and 245/40/17
Its not 18's But.....
Custom rims, wheel tire packages for your ride - RIMSnTIRES.com
That link should help you get it close in 18's
2002 WRX wagoon with 17x8.5 ET48 and 245/40/17
Its not 18's But.....
Custom rims, wheel tire packages for your ride - RIMSnTIRES.com
That link should help you get it close in 18's
#25
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,597
Car Info: hopes and dreams
Send a PM to this dude...
https://www.i-club.com/forums/norcal...0-rpf1-231535/
I would not do what he did but he'll have first hand information for you.
https://www.i-club.com/forums/norcal...0-rpf1-231535/
I would not do what he did but he'll have first hand information for you.
#26
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
I wasn't running to much camber , i was running -1.7 degree of camber. I ran that only because i didnt want to take a hard turn and damage a fender because i only have a one finger wheel gap. I did however have problems running the +45 offset. it rubbed on very hard corners on the inside of the fender wells. i think a +35 would be a better offset though in my opinion. 18's are harder to work with though. When i was "flush"(18x9 +35) i had hard problems with taking aggressive turns even with a -3 camber all around. It just all depends on tire size , rim size and how much camber you want. Also my car has sedan front and rolled/pulled rear quarters its +10mm on every corner. When i was stock body and had 18x8 +45's it would rub but then again i had stock suspension.
I said too much camber in the back because it's my opinion... and when you're running more camber in the rear than in the front it's too much camber... but that's just me so...
Thanks for the info. I honestly hope it talks the dude out of running that wheel set up. There's just not enough space without sacrificing other things and that's just not necessary.
#29
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,597
Car Info: hopes and dreams
That's why I figured you'd be the guy to talk to as I wouldn't do any of the things you did and you have the direct experience with the wheels. LOL.
I said too much camber in the back because it's my opinion... and when you're running more camber in the rear than in the front it's too much camber... but that's just me so...
Thanks for the info. I honestly hope it talks the dude out of running that wheel set up. There's just not enough space without sacrificing other things and that's just not necessary.
I said too much camber in the back because it's my opinion... and when you're running more camber in the rear than in the front it's too much camber... but that's just me so...
Thanks for the info. I honestly hope it talks the dude out of running that wheel set up. There's just not enough space without sacrificing other things and that's just not necessary.
#30
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
There really isn't enough space to do anything im running a 18x7.5 +48 until i plan on doing my fender flares. no more flush for me i plan on running a wider wheel setup with square tires to track. It was just a phase i went through for a while but i like taking aggressive turns. If the OP wants to try test fitting my 18x7.5's then i wont mind.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gc8_nate
Used Aftermarket Car Parts For Sale
0
10-28-2007 03:58 PM