Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

What rights?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 12:35 PM
  #1  
Unregistered's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,556
From: Austin, TX
What rights?!

Wow, just wow... this is some scary stuff to me.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060119/...google_records
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 12:41 PM
  #2  
Salty's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Why do they want that type of information?

If they really wanted to find this type of information couldn't the government start some small agency with some of the best SEO's this country has to offer? Although their research wouldn't 100% accurate I'm willing to bet their findings would be pretty spot on for the most part.
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #3  
zumnwrx's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,155
From: Alaska
Car Info: R.I.P 03 aspen white wrx
i saw this too and was alittle scared but for the most part think it has no legs in court

so i stopped worrying about it.
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 01:10 PM
  #4  
jvick125's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,375
From: Monterey
Car Info: Sline
Smart guys don't search for **** on google. They already have their websites from previous sources. Teenagers search for their **** on google.
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #5  
Unregistered's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,556
From: Austin, TX
Its the fact that the courts already threw it out that worries me. Anyone know if this is legal after the courts had already dealt with an issue? Enlighten me!!
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 09:53 PM
  #6  
Salty's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Well Yahoo and MSN gave up their search info while it was still steaming hot. Makes we wonder if this has happened before and if Google is not complying this time around for publicity, or to make a statement against the Bush admin given the recent “spying” info?

But anyways...

Prosecutors are requesting a "random sampling" of 1 million Internet addresses accessible through Google's popular search engine, and a random sampling of 1 million search queries submitted to Google over a one-week period.
Of all the articles i've read on this it seems that they haven't been asked to divulge any IP addresses or any other similarly sensitive info. So what is the problem here? Why not give them this vague information and be done?

Surely if the CIA, FBI or DOJ asked Google for exact searches (not "random samplings") of "WTC" immediately before 9/11, then they'd most like give it to them without question. So again, it seems like they could be saying “no” out of spite.

Regardless, if the government really wanted to get their hands on 1,000,000 inquires then all they need to do is put thousand horny teenagers in a warehouse size computer lab for a month. That or just hire some experts to make an educated guess on their keyword analysis.
Old Jan 19, 2006 | 10:39 PM
  #7  
dr3d1zzl3's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,159
From: The Least Coast :(
Car Info: 08 sti
the feds can get that info when ever they want it, hell 14 year old estonian kids can get access to that information...

they just want to be able to CTA (cover their asses) when they pull a rabbit out of a database somewhere...
Old Jan 20, 2006 | 06:41 AM
  #8  
spedmunki's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 909
From: Zoomass: Riot Capital of New England
Car Info: '97 Legacy
its just another fine example of big brother
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bootleg
Subaru General
7
Oct 25, 2005 06:34 PM
IS2Scooby
Teh Politics Forum
0
Oct 15, 2005 12:30 PM
rustokman
Suby Shopping & Maintenance/Warranty
0
Sep 9, 2004 06:42 PM
IS2Scooby
Hawaii
7
May 29, 2003 11:35 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:41 PM.