Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

What if this wasn't a mistake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 10:28 PM
  #1  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
What if this wasn't a mistake?

Just trying to be optimistic in the thread title unlike some of us.

So what's the story now? The election was a HUGE success thus far. Go ahead and turn on your television for the coverage. People are dancing, honking their horns and crying tears if joy in the streets. There's pictures among pictures of people with wax covered index fingers as a symbol of their support in Democracy. Make no mistake about it. The huge 72%+ of the voting population proves that the Iraqi people want Democracy and nothing more than to mock terrorism. This figure makes the American voting population look foolish and spoiled in what they take for granted.

Some people are even taking stands that put them in great Jeopardy:

http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/39526.htm

You may think it's a joke but at least they're taking a chance in what they believe regardless of potential risks and an uncertain future.

So who's going to be the first person to drag this thread down? Who's going to be the first person to **** in the elections cornflakes and side with the minority?
Old Jan 30, 2005 | 11:27 PM
  #2  
bassplayrr's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,709
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car Info: CRZ EX-Navi/6MT & Vue Redline
Originally Posted by Salty
Just trying to be optimistic in the thread title unlike some of us.

So what's the story now? The election was a HUGE success thus far. Go ahead and turn on your television for the coverage. People are dancing, honking their horns and crying tears if joy in the streets. There's pictures among pictures of people with wax covered index fingers as a symbol of their support in Democracy. Make no mistake about it. The huge 72%+ of the voting population proves that the Iraqi people want Democracy and nothing more than to mock terrorism. This figure makes the American voting population look foolish and spoiled in what they take for granted.

Some people are even taking stands that put them in great Jeopardy:

http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/39526.htm

You may think it's a joke but at least they're taking a chance in what they believe regardless of potential risks and an uncertain future.

So who's going to be the first person to drag this thread down? Who's going to be the first person to **** in the elections cornflakes and side with the minority?

I have a great disdain for Bush and his thugs, but that doesn't mean that I ever want the US to fail just to prove them wrong. When they're wrong I'll point it out, but if they're right I'll point that out as well. Bush mislead us regarding WMDs, but if we can gain a Democratic nation in the mideast out of this, I'll be as happy as any Bush supporter.


-Chris
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 01:01 AM
  #3  
VIBEELEVEN's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,120
From: Napa, Ca.
Car Info: 03 WRX
I think everyone who can think rationally is sick of the "mislead" wmd reference.
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 05:23 AM
  #4  
dr3d1zzl3's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,159
From: The Least Coast :(
Car Info: 08 sti
yah why bother with it they lied outright..

no need for mislead..

they did lie and for that i will never EVER forgive them. They pissed on every single one of us with their lies. If they would have just come out and said "we want to liberate iraq due to its leader being a major *******, or this and that justification based on morals and ethics" i would have no problem with it. But whipping the world up into a frenxy about non existent weapons of mass destruction is completly manufactured lie. And for that there should be ramifications, not just the head of CIA (who was a scapegoat) but cabinent members whos sole purpose was to justify a war should be held accountable. We have had HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE DIE to date.

Simply because we have seen a glimmer of hope in a rather hopeless situation does not justify our leadership blatently lieing and abusing their power.
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 05:28 AM
  #5  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
The huge turnout despite of the possibility of bombing and or terrorists attacks is absolutely amazing. Hopefully this will be a turning point over there and we can slowly start to disingage from there and the Iraqi's can start to really govern themselves.

And Vibe, even Salty admitted that the administration used WMD's as a way to gain the public's support post 9/11 whether or not it was their primary focus. It's naive to think that they didn't mislead on the subject. I remember Rummy and Cheney using words like definitely and absolutely.
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 07:02 AM
  #6  
jdepould's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,659
From: USA
Car Info: 1990 thing
Werd, the wmd thing was stupid in the first place, hell I said it to begin with before they even went in. Don't get me wrong, I wasn't opposed to them going into Iraq, I just thought having that as the sole reason was a bit asinine.
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 07:40 AM
  #7  
gpatmac's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,133
From: Lastweek Lane - Watertown, NY
Car Info: 02WRXpseudoSTiWannabeWagon
Originally Posted by dr3d1zzl3
yah why bother with it they lied outright..

no need for mislead..

they did lie and for that i will never EVER forgive them. They pissed on every single one of us with their lies. If they would have just come out and said "we want to liberate iraq due to its leader being a major *******, or this and that justification based on morals and ethics" i would have no problem with it. But whipping the world up into a frenxy about non existent weapons of mass destruction is completly manufactured lie. And for that there should be ramifications, not just the head of CIA (who was a scapegoat) but cabinent members whos sole purpose was to justify a war should be held accountable. We have had HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE DIE to date.

Simply because we have seen a glimmer of hope in a rather hopeless situation does not justify our leadership blatently lieing and abusing their power.
Are you telling me that lying and generally misleading the American people are new to any administration? You feel hurt and deceived, but that's just because you KNOW about this lie. (your words)

There is a long list of responses that the US citizen have available to them, all along the spectrum. Anything from writing letters to the editor of your hometown newspaper (or car club forum) to not voting for the guy all the way to insurrection.

What did you do? Did it make you feel better?
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 08:03 AM
  #8  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
The only reason those people in Iraq are celebrating and partying is because they think the elections mean the Americans will be leaving soon.

After all- all the objectives have been met;
We've stopped the threat of WMD from Iraq (well there really wasn't a WMD threat, but who cares)
We've taken Saddam out of power (never mind that the guy we propped up in his place is just about as corrupt and dictatorial as Saddam ever was)
Now we've brought democracy to Iraq, (well people got to vote anyway, they might not have known who they were voting for, or what the candidates positions are, but they got to vote!)

what possible reason is there for the occupation to continue? (I'm sure Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz will think of something)

My guess- the dancing in the strees is going to end as soon as they realize that the occupation is continuing
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 08:53 AM
  #9  
Salty's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by psoper
The only reason those people in Iraq are celebrating and partying is because they think the elections mean the Americans will be leaving soon.
Everyone of the people that's been interviewed thus far is celebrating because they have a freedom of choice. I did not hear one interviewee mention anything about their anticipation for the Americans leaving soon. I'm sure it's in the back of their minds but try and give the liberation some due credit for once.
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 08:54 AM
  #10  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Some quotes from the Iraqis:

"This is democracy. This is the first day I feel freedom."

"My children woke me up this morning at 6 am. 'Daddy, Daddy!' they said, 'Hurry up, Daddy, we have to vote today!'"

"I kissed the ballot box. It's a celebration, a turning point and a step toward the correct direction, toward the independence, toward getting rid of the occupation."

"And then, hearing those explosions, it occurred to me, the insurgents are weak, they are affraid of democracy, they are losing. So I got my husband, and I got my parents, and we all came out and voted together."


Yup, this war was definitely not worth it.
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 11:35 AM
  #11  
subaruguru's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 352
Originally Posted by psoper
The only reason those people in Iraq are celebrating and partying is because they think the elections mean the Americans will be leaving soon.
Is that why the bagdhad mayor supports putting up a statue of President Bush?

I'd like to see some pre-war statements, if you have seen any, where bush claims that the army will be out of Iraq within a year or some other small timespan? When did Bush promise an easy, short process?
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #12  
VIBEELEVEN's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,120
From: Napa, Ca.
Car Info: 03 WRX
Originally Posted by subaruguru
Is that why the bagdhad mayor supports putting up a statue of President Bush?
Yeah I saw that too, that's hilarous!
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 12:40 PM
  #13  
EricDaRed81's Avatar
Dirty Redhead
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,204
From: Commuting? I don't know what that means anymore.
Car Info: 05 WRX Wagon (Crystal Gray)
Originally Posted by subaruguru
Is that why the bagdhad mayor supports putting up a statue of President Bush?
Will it suffer the same fate as the Saddam Statue?
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #14  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by subaruguru
Is that why the bagdhad mayor supports putting up a statue of President Bush?

I'd like to see some pre-war statements, if you have seen any, where bush claims that the army will be out of Iraq within a year or some other small timespan? When did Bush promise an easy, short process?

When people are still suffering on account of having no fresh water and no electricity, only a pompus *** puppet of the occupiers would propose spending money on a statue to the conquering foreign invaders leader.

As for Bush saying it would be quick- he never did because his backers knew from the start that controlling their oil will be a long term and very expensive- both in terms of dollars and lives- proposition.

Bush himself doesn't have an f-ing clue.

Last edited by psoper; Jan 31, 2005 at 01:17 PM.
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 02:45 PM
  #15  
subaruguru's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 352
Originally Posted by psoper
When people are still suffering on account of having no fresh water and no electricity, only a pompus *** puppet of the occupiers would propose spending money on a statue to the conquering foreign invaders leader.

As for Bush saying it would be quick- he never did because his backers knew from the start that controlling their oil will be a long term and very expensive- both in terms of dollars and lives- proposition.

Bush himself doesn't have an f-ing clue.
First point: Are you claiming that you know more about what most citizens of Baghdad would support, than the Mayor of Baghdad? That seems to me a clear case of denying the obvious to maintain an obviously false position.

Second point: didn't you already get battered on the oil point by Salty? There is not one reason for a war. The system does not work that way. And, clueless old Bush destroyed the competition in an election and has now led America to two major democratic successes in a region where no one previously thought democracy was possible. Does that sound like a man without a clue?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:25 AM.