The Schiavo Case
#1
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 7,925
Car Info: '04 WRX Wagon
The Schiavo Case
So why hasn't anybody spouted off on this topic yet?
I mean as far as the current situation with Congress and the GWB putting together a law for her situation.
What do you guys think? I'm pretty concerned that congress and lawmakers are getting involved in our personal liberty to decide on such matters. But, I'll admit that I haven't read everything on the story.
My biggest thing is that the parents say that she can be rehabilitated but the court appointed doctors say that she has no chance.
How do the obviously emotionally charged parents know more than the doctors? Personally, I wouldn't want to live life as a veggie.
Oh and the other ironic thing that I read is that she is in this condition because of an eating disorder and now they are force feeding her to keep her alive...pretty funky.
I mean as far as the current situation with Congress and the GWB putting together a law for her situation.
What do you guys think? I'm pretty concerned that congress and lawmakers are getting involved in our personal liberty to decide on such matters. But, I'll admit that I haven't read everything on the story.
My biggest thing is that the parents say that she can be rehabilitated but the court appointed doctors say that she has no chance.
How do the obviously emotionally charged parents know more than the doctors? Personally, I wouldn't want to live life as a veggie.
Oh and the other ironic thing that I read is that she is in this condition because of an eating disorder and now they are force feeding her to keep her alive...pretty funky.
#2
I need to find some pictures of how her scans look. I saw some she will never be back to normal. Pluss on top of all this she had expressed to her husband that she did not want to be kept a live if such a situation arose. I'll go hunt down those pictures.... it shows a big chunk of her brain missing.
#4
She can't feel it to be honest. She has sever brain damage. Here are the pictures that I found. (I saw them some where else but I don't have the time to look them up.) http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archive...chiavos-brain/
I suggest you read through the blog. Some intresting point of views and I agree most with the last person that writes on there.
I suggest you read through the blog. Some intresting point of views and I agree most with the last person that writes on there.
#5
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 7,925
Car Info: '04 WRX Wagon
I think the saddest thing of all is that Congress got involved in it.
They make all these BS arguments as to why they did it but most people realize that these guys are just doing it to get more votes. Republicans and Democrats are both guilty to succumbing to this BS and wasting our tax money by having an emergency weekend session, an emergency presidential trip and a whole bunch more court dates for something that SHOULD have been handled in court ONLY.
I'm really ashamed of our elected officials and things like this remind me why politics is a profession that I quit.
They make all these BS arguments as to why they did it but most people realize that these guys are just doing it to get more votes. Republicans and Democrats are both guilty to succumbing to this BS and wasting our tax money by having an emergency weekend session, an emergency presidential trip and a whole bunch more court dates for something that SHOULD have been handled in court ONLY.
I'm really ashamed of our elected officials and things like this remind me why politics is a profession that I quit.
#6
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wherever Sucks the Most
Posts: 8,675
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
I find the whole matter rather creepy. I would otherwise agree with euthanasia but not when the woman is responsive to family. It's not like she's in a coma with an ecmo machine and respirator. Not only that but there's a capable party (the woman's immediate family) wanting to take care of her.
Although what the husband may me saying is true there's really no way to prove this. Unless I've missed some type of written statement from the woman prior to the accident, they're basically going off hearsay which holds absolutely no water. He may be the guardian but something about it reeks of wanting 100% of your dead uncles estate when there was no will.
Given the fact it's just a feeding tube, the woman is responsive to family and there's a willing party wanting to take care of her, what do you suppose triggered these husbands thoughts? I bet she’s really been a thorn in his side after 15yrs. I wonder which part of those 15yrs were harder? The initial weeks when mental shock was of the essence or around year 10 when he wanted to play the field again?
I think this is especially true given the fact her family wants to take full responsibility of her. Nothing would be more awkward for the husband than to visit your ex-wife with a new girlfriend or wife on your shoulder. I think reality really took hold of this guy like severely retarded children takes over parents lives. The only difference is that you can leave your disabled wife for a more capable body.
Although what the husband may me saying is true there's really no way to prove this. Unless I've missed some type of written statement from the woman prior to the accident, they're basically going off hearsay which holds absolutely no water. He may be the guardian but something about it reeks of wanting 100% of your dead uncles estate when there was no will.
Given the fact it's just a feeding tube, the woman is responsive to family and there's a willing party wanting to take care of her, what do you suppose triggered these husbands thoughts? I bet she’s really been a thorn in his side after 15yrs. I wonder which part of those 15yrs were harder? The initial weeks when mental shock was of the essence or around year 10 when he wanted to play the field again?
I think this is especially true given the fact her family wants to take full responsibility of her. Nothing would be more awkward for the husband than to visit your ex-wife with a new girlfriend or wife on your shoulder. I think reality really took hold of this guy like severely retarded children takes over parents lives. The only difference is that you can leave your disabled wife for a more capable body.
#7
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 7,925
Car Info: '04 WRX Wagon
Yeah it's creepy alright.
I believe the doctors in this case...she isn't gonna recover. The "person" or at least the cognitive portion of her mind is gone. She still interacts on some level but I doubt any of that is cognitive like being able to communicate or know what is going on. She is basically a vegetable.
Well there WAS a million dollar malpractice award to her in a prior case but I would think that money is all used up.
I believe the doctors in this case...she isn't gonna recover. The "person" or at least the cognitive portion of her mind is gone. She still interacts on some level but I doubt any of that is cognitive like being able to communicate or know what is going on. She is basically a vegetable.
Well there WAS a million dollar malpractice award to her in a prior case but I would think that money is all used up.
#8
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wherever Sucks the Most
Posts: 8,675
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by bpang1
Yeah it's creepy alright.
I believe the doctors in this case...she isn't gonna recover. The "person" or at least the cognitive portion of her mind is gone. She still interacts on some level but I doubt any of that is cognitive like being able to communicate or know what is going on. She is basically a vegetable.
Well there WAS a million dollar malpractice award to her in a prior case but I would think that money is all used up.
I believe the doctors in this case...she isn't gonna recover. The "person" or at least the cognitive portion of her mind is gone. She still interacts on some level but I doubt any of that is cognitive like being able to communicate or know what is going on. She is basically a vegetable.
Well there WAS a million dollar malpractice award to her in a prior case but I would think that money is all used up.
#9
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: pompous douchebag
Posts: 9,351
Car Info: $200,000 sports car
i think the reason no one has spouted off about this yet is because it's been an on-going thing for 15 years or so, and only recently has become a major news story.
i honestly have no idea who i would side with, parents or husband, and who's opinion is more morally proper.
however, i do find it somewhat disturbing that the federal government thinks it has the right to supersede the husbands right to make the final decision about his wife's future. IMHO, the husband is the foremost authority on his wife's wishes. certain things are shared with one's spouse that are not shared with parents.
personally, i don't look at this with the perspective of "what if my wife was a vegetable, who should make the decision, me or her parents"; i look at it as "if i were a vegetable, who should make the decision, my wife or my parents". and I would most definitely want my wife making that call.
i honestly have no idea who i would side with, parents or husband, and who's opinion is more morally proper.
however, i do find it somewhat disturbing that the federal government thinks it has the right to supersede the husbands right to make the final decision about his wife's future. IMHO, the husband is the foremost authority on his wife's wishes. certain things are shared with one's spouse that are not shared with parents.
personally, i don't look at this with the perspective of "what if my wife was a vegetable, who should make the decision, me or her parents"; i look at it as "if i were a vegetable, who should make the decision, my wife or my parents". and I would most definitely want my wife making that call.
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: "It will take time to restore chaos." GWB
Posts: 3,461
Car Info: 72 Vespa with curb feelers
Originally Posted by bpang1
Well there WAS a million dollar malpractice award to her in a prior case but I would think that money is all used up.
Also, when she had her heart attack, he stood by when her heart was stopped for 5 minutes... and he was trained in CPR! She had bruises and fractured bones... sounds fishy to me.
Whatever the truth is, it is inhumane to starve any living, feeling human being.
You wouldn't even treat a pet like that! If she were indeed brain dead, I "might" think otherwise.
#11
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wherever Sucks the Most
Posts: 8,675
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Supposedly, the husband claimed he needed money for costly rehab work that is done on people with such conditions to help them communicate... he got the money and never spent a dime using it to help her communicate.
Also, when she had her heart attack, he stood by when her heart was stopped for 5 minutes... and he was trained in CPR! She had bruises and fractured bones... sounds fishy to me.
Also, when she had her heart attack, he stood by when her heart was stopped for 5 minutes... and he was trained in CPR! She had bruises and fractured bones... sounds fishy to me.
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Whatever the truth is, it is inhumane to starve any living, feeling human being. You wouldn't even treat a pet like that! If she were indeed brain dead, I "might" think otherwise.
#12
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Supposedly, the husband claimed he needed money for costly rehab work that is done on people with such conditions to help them communicate... he got the money and never spent a dime using it to help her communicate.
Also, when she had her heart attack, he stood by when her heart was stopped for 5 minutes... and he was trained in CPR! She had bruises and fractured bones... sounds fishy to me.
Also, when she had her heart attack, he stood by when her heart was stopped for 5 minutes... and he was trained in CPR! She had bruises and fractured bones... sounds fishy to me.
Originally Posted by HellaDumb
Whatever the truth is, it is inhumane to starve any living, feeling human being. You wouldn't even treat a pet like that! If she were indeed brain dead, I "might" think otherwise.
Alot of miss information is being passed around by people that want the parents wishes to happen. I got a call from a family friend about this case and she said tons of things which were just not true. (I spent sometime to do some background reading after she called me because of the things she was saying just didn't add up. She told me her husband was abusive and thats "proably" why she was in the comma. While infact it was because of her bulimia.) I could go on but this woman did not wish to be kept alive and had told her husband this. On top of this the courts have decide time and time again that her husband has the final word. But this after several doctors testified that infact she will never return back to normal. You can't regrow a brain you know.
#13
Originally Posted by Salty
Not sure how true it is but supposedly her family, friends, visitors and lawyers say she's "Very Much Alive and Responsive."
Thats all bull****. She basically does what our body does unconsciously, this woman is far far far from alive and responsive.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Blue-faced in a red state
Posts: 2,256
Car Info: 04 Silver WRX Wagon
this is indeed an interesting case. for those who saw Million Dollar Baby (cool flick), there are some strong parallels. Esp. when you bring faith into the picture.
Sadly, this has become another BS divisive issue. It really shouldnt be that way.
Sadly, this has become another BS divisive issue. It really shouldnt be that way.
#15
Originally Posted by Salty
I find the whole matter rather creepy. I would otherwise agree with euthanasia but not when the woman is responsive to family. It's not like she's in a coma with an ecmo machine and respirator. Not only that but there's a capable party (the woman's immediate family) wanting to take care of her.
Originally Posted by Salty
Although what the husband may me saying is true there's really no way to prove this. Unless I've missed some type of written statement from the woman prior to the accident, they're basically going off hearsay which holds absolutely no water. He may be the guardian but something about it reeks of wanting 100% of your dead uncles estate when there was no will.
Originally Posted by Salty
Given the fact it's just a feeding tube, the woman is responsive to family and there's a willing party wanting to take care of her, what do you suppose triggered these husbands thoughts? I bet she’s really been a thorn in his side after 15yrs. I wonder which part of those 15yrs were harder? The initial weeks when mental shock was of the essence or around year 10 when he wanted to play the field again?
Originally Posted by Salty
I think this is especially true given the fact her family wants to take full responsibility of her. Nothing would be more awkward for the husband than to visit your ex-wife with a new girlfriend or wife on your shoulder. I think reality really took hold of this guy like severely retarded children takes over parents lives. The only difference is that you can leave your disabled wife for a more capable body.