Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

Proposition K- Yes or No

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 02:55 PM
  #31  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by Shayhan27
Yes on 8 instead of leagalizing gay marraige why dont we create a union for gays and lesbiens so they can collect the benefits without actually calling it marraige? IMO
Why shouldn't two people who love each other be allowed to marry? Dont you think divorce is a much larger threat to the so called sancitity of marriage?
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #32  
sigma pi's Avatar
9 to 5 mod
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 57,389
From: Chavez Ravine
Car Info: 03 Impreza WRX
yes on 8 im a bible thumper



yay on K



churches may loose tax exempt status
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #33  
VRT MBasile's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 22,776
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
Originally Posted by jewpac42
Its not legal, its decriminalized. It means girls will not be prosecuted or arrested for selling sex, very different than legalization.
What's the difference?

Also, does this decriminalize buying sex too? Or just selling?
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #34  
VRT MBasile's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 22,776
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
Originally Posted by Shayhan27
You are absolutely correct and I respect your oppinion. Being a religious person my only sticking point on it is calling it a marraige. While I tolerate homosexuality I do not agree with it, and IMO marraige was started by religion and that religion was a belief in god the one in heaven. GOD says being gay is bad. I simply am not ready for gay people to marry eachother. Dont want to thread jack though and I apologize NO ON K
IMO, scratch that, in my country, your religion has nothing to do with laws. Your morals have nothing to do with laws. Gay marriage shouldn't be an issue, and the arguements for prop 8 are some of the most mentally challenged bouts of verbal diarhea I have ever heard.

Also, I'm not gay, so what gives me the right to say they can't do something I can? I'm assuming you're not gay, so what gives you the right to tell them they can't do something that has NO EFFECT ON YOU OR ANYONE ELSE.

If we are going to deny them the right to marriage, can we also deny it to the Polish and French? They aren't like me, so why should they be allowed to marry?

Last edited by VRT MBasile; Oct 24, 2008 at 03:23 PM.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #35  
KOSTI's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,532
From: The Town / Oakland
Car Info: Black On Black Wingless 05 STI
Originally Posted by VRT MBasile
What's the difference?

Also, does this decriminalize buying sex too? Or just selling?
Just selling it from what I'm reading. They've always gone after the "Johns" as that effect has bigger results than taking down the seller.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:34 PM
  #36  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by sigma pi
yes on 8 im a bible thumper



yay on K



churches may loose tax exempt status
My tax dollars should not be going to private institutions who discriminate against others.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:35 PM
  #37  
jewpac42's Avatar
I don't need more cowbell dammit!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,203
From: Equally as important as Walter
Car Info: E82
Originally Posted by VRT MBasile
What's the difference?

Also, does this decriminalize buying sex too? Or just selling?
Its still illegal, just girls will not be prosecuted for it. I believe just selling. It could potentially save the city up to $11 million per year.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #38  
VRT MBasile's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 22,776
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
Originally Posted by jewpac42
Its still illegal, just girls will not be prosecuted for it. I believe just selling. It could potentially save the city up to $11 million per year.
but if they can't be arrested, investigated, or prosecuted, what effectively is the difference?
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #39  
kspek's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,808
From: touge
Car Info: non subarus
i wonder how the citys gonna tax it.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 05:00 PM
  #40  
Shagon Wagon's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,250
From: Yea, you like my JDM backside. Quit staring ^^
Car Info: A crazy ass wagon ! Voltex and 18x9.5 +22 FTW !
Originally Posted by sigma pi
yes on 8 im a bible thumper



yay on K



churches may loose tax exempt status

I feel like thats who is voting yes on 8, all the bible thumpers ... NO ON 8
Old Oct 25, 2008 | 03:53 PM
  #41  
Lboogie's Avatar
banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,456
From: NorCal, SF East Bay
Car Info: 2007 WRX Limited | vf43'D
Maybe San Francisco is trying to overtake Vegas as "Sin City". Got the sex & the drugs, what's next?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dlgonsalves
Central Valley
31
Nov 5, 2009 08:31 PM
R-Dub
Bay Area
15
Dec 9, 2008 08:16 AM
Irish_car_B0mb
Teh Politics Forum
29
Nov 7, 2008 03:51 PM
enigma
Ongoing Projects
0
Jan 2, 2003 07:41 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 PM.