Obama administration again channels Bush. The Arristocrats!
Thread Starter
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
Obama administration again channels Bush. The Arristocrats!
Obama admin. claims right to detain and imprison people indefinitely without charge.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/us...5fJ367XoIp/5fw
Change.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/us...5fJ367XoIp/5fw
Change.
Last edited by Irrational X; Sep 24, 2009 at 07:15 AM.
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
In concluding that it does not need specific permission from Congress to hold detainees without charges, the Obama administration is adopting one of the arguments advanced by the Bush administration in years of debates about detention policies.
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,686
From: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
The department pointed out that courts would continue to review the cases of those held without charges through habeas corpus hearings. The Washington Post first reported the decision.
BanHammer™
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 47,596
From: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Car Info: 2014 Forester XT
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,686
From: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
Didn't I point out a change in my post? Is that not a positive aspect of this whole gitmo situation? Especially considering congress is resisting moving the prisoners on American turf.
I don't expect the moon from this president, but I think he's trying to be pragmatic about this.
I don't expect the moon from this president, but I think he's trying to be pragmatic about this.
Thread Starter
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
and so can i....
oh wait thats the same quote you posted you say, why did i post it again?
does that mean cherry picking the article goes three ways?... or just that you believe the first thing you hear....
the article continues:
while the rational is different... "tainted by interrogation methods" vs "no appropriate court with jurisdiction (and other excuses)" the end result is still the same, indefinite imprisonment.
go back to your room son, the adults are talking.
The department pointed out that courts would continue to review the cases of those held without charges through habeas corpus hearings. The Washington Post first reported the 
.
.
The department pointed out that courts would continue to review the cases of those held without charges through habeas corpus hearings. The Washington Post first reported the decision.
the article continues:
The legal interpretation applies to detainees whom the government concludes should be held because they are a continuing danger to national security but who cannot be brought to trial for various reasons, like evidence tainted by harsh interrogations.
go back to your room son, the adults are talking.
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,686
From: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
and so can i....
oh wait thats the same quote you posted you say, why did i post it again?
does that mean cherry picking the article goes three ways?... or just that you believe the first thing you hear....
the article continues:
while the rational is different... "tainted by interrogation methods" vs "no appropriate court with jurisdiction (and other excuses)" the end result is still the same, indefinite imprisonment.
go back to your room son, the adults are talking.
oh wait thats the same quote you posted you say, why did i post it again?
does that mean cherry picking the article goes three ways?... or just that you believe the first thing you hear....
the article continues:
while the rational is different... "tainted by interrogation methods" vs "no appropriate court with jurisdiction (and other excuses)" the end result is still the same, indefinite imprisonment.
go back to your room son, the adults are talking.
P.S. I was just pointing out that cherry picking a quote while ignoring the rest is intillectually dishonest.
... and it's "rationale" jerk.
Last edited by Superglue WRX; Sep 25, 2009 at 12:20 AM. Reason: edited for explicit comment
Didn't I point out a change in my post? Is that not a positive aspect of this whole gitmo situation? Especially considering congress is resisting moving the prisoners on American turf.
I don't expect the moon from this president, but I think he's trying to be pragmatic about this.
I don't expect the moon from this president, but I think he's trying to be pragmatic about this.
....son . hahaha ok i am just joking on that part
Thread Starter
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
