You all offend me, especially Salty.














































When's it my turn to offend all of you?

 

I knew this was coming... I'm just tired of trying to get him to understand. It is been made apparent to me recently that it is not worth my time trying. I feel I have made several good points toward him, all in an effort to keep the moderator in check (or moderated, you might say). He has simply denied or refused to acknoledge every single counterpoint I make toward his. I guess since he's a mod, he is the supreme authority, right? Who am I to question him? Such blasphemy I speak!

To explain to the rest of you....
He dodged the point of the passage by looking for a reason why not to have to take heed to what it says. By golly, he found one (I'll admit, he's good at that)- So just because it was a little off topic of the thread, the points made carry no value?
If he were to have sarted a new thread, would you have replied more graciously and actually have adressed the points that were made?

 

What in the hell are you going on about?!

To answer the first question, yes! If we can't at least try and stay on topic in these threads then why even bother in the first place? I know some threads steer off course with silly tangents over time but not when the thread is directed toward a handful of posters. And certainly not when these poster's first posts have little to nothing to do with the initial question. That's as asinine as writing a column on the World Series in the classified section -or- writing a thesis on something completely out of your field of study.

For those of you recently joining us, I was referring to psoper's (and a few others) bull-**** conspiracy posts and how they'd rather have no evidence on a irrational story rather than little evidence on the official story.

As for the second question, yes! (refer to answer #1 on why)

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by psoper
OK Salty you want to know my take on 9/11, here it is in a nutshell.

Dick Cheney directed the whole thing from Washington, under the guise of several "terrorist training drills" so that the expected intercept responses from Norad and the ANG were halted because commanders thought that these hijackings were part of these drills.

I think that the planes were flown by remote control, although I fully expect that there were some radical Islamists led to believe that they were on a "mission from Allah" to hijack the planes, and lend some token creidbility to the official story, but they couldn't have known the real plan, and couldn't have had the skills or reliability needed to fly the "final mission" with certainty.

The "missile hit the Pentagon" hypothesis is being promulgated by those in the know- as disinformation to discredit anyone who even questions the "official story"

But the destruction of the world trade centers was done for two reasons;

1) to obliterate records of international criminal activities carried out by certain "friends" of the administration, and

2) to serve as the PNAC's "new Pearl Harbor" an attack of such enormity and complete outrageous proportion that the nation would be spurred to otherwise untenable levels of hatred, so that those really in power could accelerate their plan to take over the world.

Go ahead, try to prove to me that any of these points are wrong, I don't think you can- because there is more evidence out there supporting my story than there is supporting the "official" story.


Dude, you should write for the x files