Good Read, re: Voter Motivation
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,256
From: Blue-faced in a red state
Car Info: 04 Silver WRX Wagon
The best statistic / map I have seen is the correlation between education and who people cast their vote for. We have the dumbest president voted in by the dumbest people 
And because he is a good leader? Oh yeah, he landed that fighter jet on the carrier. Go get em Dubya!!

And because he is a good leader? Oh yeah, he landed that fighter jet on the carrier. Go get em Dubya!!
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 933
From: Sacramento
Car Info: Stock Legacy Turbo Wagon Silver
Originally Posted by dub2w
The best statistic / map I have seen is the correlation between education and who people cast their vote for.
So you admit he targeted a specific group but yet this wasn't a factor on who voted for him? The religious right did come out to vote and strong. Thats my point. Thats been my point since the start. For you to admit that he did target them and still deny the fact that they are the reason he won baffles me. You do know that all the states he won where all in the bible belt? Maybe if I tell you again, his plan was for the religious right to support him and suprise they did... come on its not that hard.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 933
From: Sacramento
Car Info: Stock Legacy Turbo Wagon Silver
Originally Posted by Unregistered
So you admit he targeted a specific group but yet this wasn't a factor on who voted for him? The religious right did come out to vote and strong. Thats my point. Thats been my point since the start. For you to admit that he did target them and still deny the fact that they are the reason he won baffles me. You do know that all the states he won where all in the bible belt? Maybe if I tell you again, his plan was for the religious right to support him and suprise they did... come on its not that hard.
Originally Posted by Unregistered
You don't think it was the religious right that won the election for him?
HAHAH classic.
HAHAH classic.
I don't think it was the religous right that won the election for him, they were less of a factor then they were in the last election. Voters believed he was a better choice for the fight against terrorism, that is why he won. The defining issue of this election, his administration and campaign were his stance on terrorism and the war in Iraq. That is why Kerry attacked him on the subject so much.
Dirty Redhead
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,204
From: Commuting? I don't know what that means anymore.
Car Info: 05 WRX Wagon (Crystal Gray)
Originally Posted by Salty
Elitism is the very fabric of every true-liberal I’ve encountered.
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,661
From: location location
Car Info: 98 Impreza Outback Sport
Originally Posted by Salty
Ok, ok... so if it was religion that won it for Bush then why are Democrats trying to give Hillary the 2008 ticket? Doesn't that seem like an extremely bad move to have more evangelicals vote Republican in 2008?
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,661
From: location location
Car Info: 98 Impreza Outback Sport
Originally Posted by deyes
Voters believed he was a better choice for the fight against terrorism, that is why he won. The defining issue of this election, his administration and campaign were his stance on terrorism and the war in Iraq. That is why Kerry attacked him on the subject so much.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 933
From: Sacramento
Car Info: Stock Legacy Turbo Wagon Silver
Originally Posted by scoobsport98
I think it's more Republicans trying to give Hillary the Dem's ticket- because they all know she wouldn't stand a chance.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 933
From: Sacramento
Car Info: Stock Legacy Turbo Wagon Silver
Originally Posted by scoobsport98
Do you find it at all interesting that virtually every major population center (which happen to be the country's most likely potential terror targets) voted democrat? Seeing they have so much at stake in the terror war, why didn't they vote for the candidate who would better protect them?
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,661
From: location location
Car Info: 98 Impreza Outback Sport
Originally Posted by deyes
Terror or not those states voted the party line just like good democrats do. They have voted democrats for decades, if not nearly centuries.
Bottom line is, that nobody really knows why the other party voted, much less their own party. We'd all like to generalize the opposite side and lump them together into one fun-loving bunch. Doing this, while making it easier to make points, will always cause an argument because of those out there who don't follow the generalization. Let's just try to be fair, here.
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,312
From: UCIrvine
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
Originally Posted by scoobsport98
My point was, that if the war on terror was large factor in the election, for either side, wouldn't you think that those most at risk would vote for the person who would better protect them? Seeing that the pop. centers voted for Kerry, and assuming Bush was the better man for the war on terror- I think we can conclude that the war on terror did not affect the election as much as we all thought it would. If you want to say they voted democratic because they have so for years, you can't have a double standard and infer that middle America (which has consistently voted Rep. for years) voted on the issues- not the party lines.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 933
From: Sacramento
Car Info: Stock Legacy Turbo Wagon Silver
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Go watch cspan deyes you'll see some real party line humping by the republicans when it comes to voting.
Originally Posted by scoobsport98
Do you find it at all interesting that virtually every major population center (which happen to be the country's most likely potential terror targets) voted democrat? Seeing they have so much at stake in the terror war, why didn't they vote for the candidate who would better protect them?
Last edited by deyes; Nov 11, 2004 at 01:24 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 933
From: Sacramento
Car Info: Stock Legacy Turbo Wagon Silver
Originally Posted by scoobsport98
assuming Bush was the better man for the war on terror- I think we can conclude that the war on terror did not affect the election as much as we all thought it would. If you want to say they voted democratic because they have so for years, you can't have a double standard and infer that middle America (which has consistently voted Rep. for years) voted on the issues- not the party lines.
Numbers have shown that it was the war on terror and the war in Iraq seeing as the religious right was less of a factor in this race then the last. Religion certainly wasn't the reason that the liberal left voted for Kerry was it?
Originally Posted by scoobsport98
Bottom line is, that nobody really knows why the other party voted, much less their own party. We'd all like to generalize the opposite side and lump them together into one fun-loving bunch. Doing this, while making it easier to make points, will always cause an argument because of those out there who don't follow the generalization. Let's just try to be fair, here.


