Food for thought
#1
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wherever Sucks the Most
Posts: 8,675
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Food for thought
Just thought you'd like to know
http://www.detnews.com/2005/politics.../A09-44410.htm
And in other news two third-party presidential candidates want second Ohio recount!
I'd be upset if I was a resident of Ohio...
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...l_pr/ohio_vote
Simply amazing!
http://www.detnews.com/2005/politics.../A09-44410.htm
TOLEDO, Ohio -- Election officials finished the presidential recount in Ohio on Tuesday, with the final tally shaving about 300 votes off President Bush's margin of victory in the state that gave him a second term.
The recount shows Bush winning Ohio by 118,457 votes over John Kerry, according to unofficial results provided to the Associated Press by the 88 counties. Lucas County, home to Toledo, was the last to finish counting.
The state had earlier declared Bush the winner by 118,775 votes and plans to adjust its totals to reflect the recount later this week.
The Kerry campaign supported the recount, but said it did not expect the tally to change the election winner. Supporters of the recount, requested by two minor party candidates, said they wanted to make sure every valid vote was counted.
Kerry gained 734 more votes in the recount, and Bush picked up 449.
The recount will end up costing taxpayers an estimated $1.5 million.
The recount shows Bush winning Ohio by 118,457 votes over John Kerry, according to unofficial results provided to the Associated Press by the 88 counties. Lucas County, home to Toledo, was the last to finish counting.
The state had earlier declared Bush the winner by 118,775 votes and plans to adjust its totals to reflect the recount later this week.
The Kerry campaign supported the recount, but said it did not expect the tally to change the election winner. Supporters of the recount, requested by two minor party candidates, said they wanted to make sure every valid vote was counted.
Kerry gained 734 more votes in the recount, and Bush picked up 449.
The recount will end up costing taxpayers an estimated $1.5 million.
And in other news two third-party presidential candidates want second Ohio recount!
I'd be upset if I was a resident of Ohio...
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...l_pr/ohio_vote
Simply amazing!
#4
VIP Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wherever Sucks the Most
Posts: 8,675
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
Originally Posted by VIBEELEVEN
To be fair, as well as wast more money, they should do recounts in the blue states to see how many voters were "disinfranchized"
I couldn’t imagine going skydiving with these types of people. Imagine how many tests and inspection would have to be done on something that's keeping them alive? Amazing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Choku Dori
Meetings, Events & Donuts
29
09-11-2004 02:18 PM