Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

Finally: Scott Peterson Convicted of Murdering Wife

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 03:44 PM
  #16  
Unregistered's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,556
From: Austin, TX
I bet appeal.... he is guilty though.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 03:49 PM
  #17  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by deyes
Wouldn't locking him up with other perverted murderers and rapists so that he can be harrased and raped repeatedly constitute cruel and unusual punishment?
In his case, no it really wouldn't....
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 04:04 PM
  #18  
FUNKED1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,152
How can it be two counts of murder? If killing a fetus is murder then why isn't every abortionist in the state on trial? Seems like he would have a good chance at an appeal of the 2nd count.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 04:04 PM
  #19  
FUNKED1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,152
Originally Posted by MVWRX
Hahahaha, no kidding...why the f*** would he change his hair color right after his wife died? He is a stupid man...I thought his wife was really hot too...
Reminds me of that guy on Twin Peaks.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 04:18 PM
  #20  
psoper's Avatar
250,000-mile Club President
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,770
From: Bizerkeley
Car Info: MBP 02 WRX wagon
Originally Posted by FUNKED1
How can it be two counts of murder? If killing a fetus is murder then why isn't every abortionist in the state on trial? Seems like he would have a good chance at an appeal of the 2nd count.
Everyone performing abortions late in the third trimester- maybe, but not "every abortionist in the state".

There are some rules and ethics followed in the medical business, even if your particular opinions on abortion aren't shared by everyone (we do have another thread running rampant on the subject as you are well aware).

But you are right, in that he does have a strong case for an appeal on the second count, as the law that allowed him to be charged on the second count hasn't been brought to a judge for ruling on appeal yet.

Hopefully other things will be deemed "newsworthy" by then though.

Last edited by psoper; Nov 12, 2004 at 04:24 PM.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 04:27 PM
  #21  
subaruguru's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 352
Originally Posted by psoper
Everyone performing abortions late in the third trimester- maybe, but not "every abortionist in the state".

There are some rules and ethics followed in the medical business, even if your particular opinions on abortion aren't shared by everyone (we do have another thread running rampant on the subject as you are well aware).

But you are right, in that he does have a strong case for an appeal on the second count, as the law that allowed him to be charged on the second count hasn't been brought to a judge for ruling on appeal yet.

Hopefully other things will be deemed "newsworthy" by then though.
Scott has zero appeal on the murder of the baby count. There's no constitutional or statutory requirement that laws be consistent. Laws that increase penalties for the killing of pregnant women are entirely constitutional. All that is prohibited now is preventing a woman and her doctor from deciding to abort a fetus. There's no constitutional provision that says "assigning a penalty for criminal murder of a fetus is illegal".
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 04:29 PM
  #22  
FUNKED1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,152
There's no constitutional provision that says "assigning a penalty for criminal murder of a fetus is illegal".
Good times.
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 11:31 PM
  #23  
Group B's Avatar
Dahveed aka Robin Hood
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,793
From: Robbin' the Hood (Claycord)
Car Info: (RIP) '04 STi Silver
Originally Posted by bassplayrr
I personally think he witnessed the missle (later proclaimed to be a jet ) that hit the pentagon, and Bush Co. is just trying to shut him up.

-Chris
hmm what do you make of this?

http://www.twa800.com/index.htm
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 11:35 PM
  #24  
Group B's Avatar
Dahveed aka Robin Hood
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,793
From: Robbin' the Hood (Claycord)
Car Info: (RIP) '04 STi Silver
*Glass Raised*

I hope Scott is torn apart/ borken broomsticked by inmates/guards.
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 12:20 AM
  #25  
Cyrus923's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (-2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 829
From: Knoxville, Tennessee
Car Info: 2004 WRX in WR Blue
Good. He's a *****, one less person to kill.
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 10:19 AM
  #26  
EricDaRed81's Avatar
Dirty Redhead
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,204
From: Commuting? I don't know what that means anymore.
Car Info: 05 WRX Wagon (Crystal Gray)
Originally Posted by MVWRX
Alright...just to throw a wrench in the works...I don't think he should be killed. Don't you think his life would be more misserable if he had to spend the entire rest of it in a jail cell getting harrased by other inmates? Killing him accomplishes nothing other than satisfying a few peoples vindictive minds. The worst punishment is not death, it is hellish life.
I agree if our prisons didn't have activities and libraries and TV.

I think it sucks when we have to pay to keep him alive. And also pay to kill him.

The real death penalty is taking him out back and spending the money for one bullet and the hour of labor to shoot him. Then let the family pay for burial I sure as hell don't want to.

Kinda cruel but I like it
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 11:41 AM
  #27  
riptide2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 108
I don't think he should get the death penalty... I feel that the death penalty should be reserved for the cases when there's direct evidence. Here, pretty much all evidence has been circumstantial. Basically, I don't think it's right to put someone to death when there's still a possibility that someone else might have done it.
Old Nov 14, 2004 | 10:15 AM
  #28  
HomerJay's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,706
From: Santa Rosa
Car Info: MY00RS25
I don't really see this as politics, but Ihave to agree w/ Riptide2. Regardless of personal feelings, evidence states he's not even guilty.
Old Nov 14, 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #29  
VIBEELEVEN's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,120
From: Napa, Ca.
Car Info: 03 WRX
Originally Posted by Salty
What a waste of tax payers money this fiasco was, huh? I thought the man was guilty before the trail even started. The fact he was caught with tons of cash and blonde hair further solidified my assumption.

Maybe now I won't have to wait 30+ minutes to get a decent local weather report now that this bull**** coverage is off the air...

*raises glass* Here's to him possibly getting the death sentence when I’m in my late 40's, the bloodsucking media who covered this story and to our worthless legal system! *cheers*


http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041112/D86AIH0O0.html
I wish you were right but we still have the sentancing phase, and don't forget about that appeal
Old Nov 14, 2004 | 03:24 PM
  #30  
VIBEELEVEN's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,120
From: Napa, Ca.
Car Info: 03 WRX
every one knows he's guilty, even though the case should've been thrown out since the prosecution couldn't even prove a cause of death, weapon, or motive among other things. He was convicted beacause the feminasts are still mad about oj



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:50 AM.