Teh Politics Forum Rumors and lies and Teh Iraqi Info Minister and much much more...

Enough Already with the Bail Outs!! Seriously!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 09:35 PM
  #46  
RussB's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,351
From: pompous douchebag
Car Info: $200,000 sports car
Originally Posted by joltdudeuc
How people spend it is up to them that's freedom. They can buy something, they can save it, they can pay down debt... it's up to them. It's their money once they cash the check. The money goes somewhere... At least we get something... more than we'd get in any tax break.
i love my tax breaks. my mortgage saves me more in taxes than the stimulus check. my wife's tuition saves a bunch. my dependent deduction and credit save a bunch. my pre-tax deductions save a bunch.

If they pay down debt it helps them. If they buy a TV it helps the TV manufacturer and the retail store they bought it from. If they save it it helps put money into the banking system. It's all goes somewhere. If they it in a safe in their closet, then it's just there... but still their choice.
and 3 million unemployed auto workers, supplier workers, salesmen, mechanics, etc... will undo any progress the stimulus checks made. 3 million more people collecting unemployement / welfare / food stamps / other forms of government assistance. more burden on the rest of us.

$25 billion only helps them for 1 year. That's it... what then? They have made no steps to change their ways. They were also bailed out, helped in the 70s, during the last large gas crisis (this recent one is not as bad, still hurt a lot of people though, esp truckers). They made some small cars for a while, and then oil inventories grew hugely... prices plummeted... Back to big cars! Whooo hooo!
where is it documented that it's only a 1 year fix? maybe it's only a 3 month fix, it could be a lifetime fix, it could do nothing at all. Chrysler got government assistance in the 70's, thats it. they paid their loan (not bail-out) back, ahead of schedule, with interest.

So, how do we MAKE THEM create good cars again, efficient cars... Small cars, quality cars. Not SUVS, no DUB Edition Chargers and Laredo Trucks.
they ARE making smaller cars, better cars, more efficient cars. the auto industry plans about 5 to 7 years in advance. what's in the market now was planned back when gas was cheap and people weren't worried about a bad economy. how DARE they provide the consumers what they wanted...



so here's a thought... nobody likes outsourcing right? well, that's what we've all been doing these last years. my i've only bought japenese cars in my adult life, i've been outsourcing my car production. we've all been doing it. so who was left buying GM / Chevy / Ford products? truck buyers. so what did they build? trucks, lots of em. bastards.

maybe our government should have done what other foreign governments have been doing for ages... tax the **** out of foreign autos.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 11:19 PM
  #47  
SubySal's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 341
From: High in the Rockies!... but not too high
Car Info: 2004 2.5RS pacifica blue with black Tarmacs
Originally Posted by RussB
they ARE making smaller cars, better cars, more efficient cars. the auto industry plans about 5 to 7 years in advance. what's in the market now was planned back when gas was cheap and people weren't worried about a bad economy. how DARE they provide the consumers what they wanted...
Why did consumers want big cars? Are big cars really safer, are they more prestigious, or is it just what the media guided by the big 3 tells us we need? You know it seems to me that you can make a profit and still make a decent product. I just think they're greedy. I know what a revelation. They tell us what we want using the media. We want SUV's. Why? Well because the big three makes a bigger profit on them. A better idea would be to better train our drivers so we don't need to drive tanks, but where's the profit in that. Have you guys looked around. American drivers are a joke really. OK I'm getting off topic. Now I have no problem with making a profit, but not at the cost of the company.

Anyway it seems to me this all started back in the 70's. Fuel got tight and better made higher MPG imports started to trickle into the market. Well there's no doubt the big three felt threatened. They went so far as to lobby government officials to put tariffs on those imports and spent millions launching a huge ad campaign. Hmm it seems the one thing they didn't do was really try to attack the real problem and build a better product. The Japanese/ Germans took some initiative and started to build factories here to produce there product. Screwing up the big 3 plan. Oh well. What's capitalism without a little healthy competition.



so here's a thought... nobody likes outsourcing right? well, that's what we've all been doing these last years. my I've only bought Japanese cars in my adult life, I've been outsourcing my car production. we've all been doing it. so who was left buying GM / Chevy / Ford products? truck buyers. so what did they build? trucks, lots of em. bastards.
You have a point here, but you know Detroit automakers did still produce cars and you know even if they were more expensive than their Japanese counterparts I think people still would've bought them, but add to that the fact that the domestic car quality doesn't measure up and it's no contest. I mean come on.

I know this is not what your trying to say, but it sounds like the only way the big 3 can sell a product is if their only competition is each other.

maybe our government should have done what other foreign governments have been doing for ages... tax the **** out of foreign autos.
That's the first thing that the big 3 tried.




You know I don't have a problem giving the Big Three money to be competitive, but like all of you I want them to be held accountable. I want change. I want a working and not a failing business for my $83. I mean the only reason we all have this contempt is because we feel that they have such terrible ethics. I mean taking a your private jet to a hearing to ask for money...WTF.

It dawns on me that the real beginning of the end for the Big 3 was the internet. With true information about their products now so easily available the American consumer became better informed and was no longer solely at the mercy of their marketing ads.

In truth I think we just got collectively smarter about our purchases. I mean hell I don't buy anything now without extensive research from cars to universal remotes.
Old Nov 19, 2008 | 11:25 PM
  #48  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by RussB
i love my tax breaks. my mortgage saves me more in taxes than the stimulus check. my wife's tuition saves a bunch. my dependent deduction and credit save a bunch. my pre-tax deductions save a bunch.



and 3 million unemployed auto workers, supplier workers, salesmen, mechanics, etc... will undo any progress the stimulus checks made. 3 million more people collecting unemployement / welfare / food stamps / other forms of government assistance. more burden on the rest of us.



where is it documented that it's only a 1 year fix? maybe it's only a 3 month fix, it could be a lifetime fix, it could do nothing at all. Chrysler got government assistance in the 70's, thats it. they paid their loan (not bail-out) back, ahead of schedule, with interest.



they ARE making smaller cars, better cars, more efficient cars. the auto industry plans about 5 to 7 years in advance. what's in the market now was planned back when gas was cheap and people weren't worried about a bad economy. how DARE they provide the consumers what they wanted...



so here's a thought... nobody likes outsourcing right? well, that's what we've all been doing these last years. my i've only bought japenese cars in my adult life, i've been outsourcing my car production. we've all been doing it. so who was left buying GM / Chevy / Ford products? truck buyers. so what did they build? trucks, lots of em. bastards.

maybe our government should have done what other foreign governments have been doing for ages... tax the **** out of foreign autos.
1) where is the evidence that so many people would lose their jobs? we dont know how deep this will go, only how deep it may go. just like we dont know how long $25bil will last the big 3. ive read that it will be enough for all 3 to run throgh 09. even if they get it, to truly last them they will have to cut jobs massively and close many more plants.

2) they arent making the cars we should be making. if they plan that far in advance, then it makes sense they are failing cause its evident they didnt plan very well, cause they sure are hurting. they are still pushhing trucks, still producing them. this year is the first year im seeing them closing truck and suv plants and retooling a few others. thats tells me they planned to still make big cars several years ago, and are stuggling to adapt. 7 years ago gas prices were roughly double what they were in 99, thats a pretty good sign of things to come. also, toyota is a good example, still making plants here in the us, and not cutting massive jobs... not closing plants. making new plants. they planned well, deversified their production. they can do it here, why cant we??

outsourcing? nisssan, toyota, and subaru have plants here, probably others. every person whos bought a legacy or outback since 2001 has had it made here in the us. imprezas and foresters are still made in gunma. besides, we already have trade tarriffs and things against forgien companies. maybe thats why they built plants here. not sure. still doing it better than we are.

btw, saw tonight on ktvu that the everage union worker makes $73/hr... amazing. managment is probably making 50x that.

oh, and why did you buy japanese cars in your adult life? we own 3 american cars right now at home, and all are the worst of the bunch. 2 are german, 2 are japanese. soon 2 of those american ones will be gone, with just my fathers chevy truck left. (contractor). we wont be buying american, just not worth it.

and where are the deals? so many cars on the lots, so many at the ports and distribution lots. not really seeing rock bottom deals.

and i was hoping to buy a truck next year, been waiting for the baby diesel motors in the 1500s, probably not gonna happen now it looks like. lots of guys looking for fuel effecient car haulers. too bad, toyota will probably step in in some years.
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 07:07 AM
  #49  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by joltdudeuc
1) where is the evidence that so many people would lose their jobs? we dont know how deep this will go, only how deep it may go. just like we dont know how long $25bil will last the big 3. ive read that it will be enough for all 3 to run throgh 09. even if they get it, to truly last them they will have to cut jobs massively and close many more plants.
It is all estimates until it happens. It would be no different than any other industry if it were in this predicament. The best I have found is the Center for Automotive research study done in early November. http://www.cargroup.org/documents/FI...act_3__001.pdf

They have already made very substantial cuts that will take effect in 2009-2010. GM has cut down on its workforce by 45% since 2001. With 252,000 employees worldwide, GM ranks fifth overall behind Volkswagen (373,400 employees,) Renault/Nissan (316,121 employees,) Toyota (316,121 employees) and Daimler (272,382 employees). Yet GM sold more vehicles worldwide last year than any other automaker. The US auto industry spends more money on R&D than any other automotive industry in the world – more than $12 billion annually.

Originally Posted by joltdudeuc
btw, saw tonight on ktvu that the everage union worker makes $73/hr... amazing. managment is probably making 50x that.
The average UAW worker made $27 /hr last year. Don't believe everything you hear in the media.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1...389/733/663386

What you are seeing in that report is wage plus benefits, but since the restructuring that happened with the UAW and healthcare last year I guarantee you that GM, Ford and Chrysler do not pay 40+ bucks/hr for benefits.

And can we just stop with the American cars are not as well made BS? For the last 5 years Honda, GM and Toyota have been trading the top spot in quality back and forth..

I have a WRX and have had a brand new GMC Sierra truck for the last 1.5 years and I can tell you that I haven't had any issues with the truck. It gets about 5 - 7 less MPG than my Subaru but I don't have to put premium in it so it is fairly close as far as that goes and it is a great vehicle. It gets the best MPG of any full size truck (Sans a diesel of course)
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 08:27 AM
  #50  
Superglue WRX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,686
From: I was up above it, now I'm down in it
Car Info: New Government Motors SUV!
Originally Posted by SilverScoober02
The average UAW worker made $27 /hr last year. Don't believe everything you hear in the media.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1...389/733/663386
$27 is still a lot of money to pay for a non-skilled worker. I'd like to know how much the guys at the NUMI plant make, I bet it's less than $27/hr and I'm sure the cost of living in Flint, MI isn't anything compared to Fremont, CA.
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 09:33 AM
  #51  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by Superglue WRX
$27 is still a lot of money to pay for a non-skilled worker. I'd like to know how much the guys at the NUMI plant make, I bet it's less than $27/hr and I'm sure the cost of living in Flint, MI isn't anything compared to Fremont, CA.
You're probably right. Pretty sad, since cost of living out there is amazing low vs here.

$73 with benefits is also something that one can't really dismiss. That's substantial!
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #52  
LxJLthr's Avatar
I survived the Mod Challenge and all I got was this lousy title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Originally Posted by Superglue WRX
$27 is still a lot of money to pay for a non-skilled worker. I'd like to know how much the guys at the NUMI plant make, I bet it's less than $27/hr and I'm sure the cost of living in Flint, MI isn't anything compared to Fremont, CA.
Very true statement; $27/hour is roughly $54,000/year before benefits assuming that is a correct figure. To put things in perspective; that was a starting salary for top level/prestigious public accounting and advisory firms when I was graduating couple years ago and those positions required 4-5 year degrees. I do not know how much training those non-skilled/union jobs require, but I highly doubt it is 4 years worth. I decided to go the college route, so that's what I can relate to...but whatever the case is, I think effort-to-compensation ratio is a bit out of wack with union pay.

And, again, let's not forget the Job Bank @ GM fund; where union workers get almost their full salary and benefits if they are laid off while they sit around waiting for a replacement job. So, even if they are laid off with the current crisis...SURPRISE...they will be the LAST people to feel its effects unless that fund gets frozen as part of restructuring.

Last edited by LxJLthr; Nov 20, 2008 at 10:22 AM. Reason: Laid off NOT just laid :P
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #53  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by LxJLthr
And, again, let's not forget the Job Bank @ GM fund; where union workers get almost their full salary and benefits if they are laid while they sit around waiting for a replacement job.
Sign me up for that job!!!
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #54  
LxJLthr's Avatar
I survived the Mod Challenge and all I got was this lousy title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,030
From: In Mother Russia...
Car Info: ...zeh car drives you!
Originally Posted by Paul@dbtuned
Sign me up for that job!!!
Damn! Awesome typo! Sign me up as well!
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 10:56 AM
  #55  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by Superglue WRX
$27 is still a lot of money to pay for a non-skilled worker. I'd like to know how much the guys at the NUMI plant make, I bet it's less than $27/hr and I'm sure the cost of living in Flint, MI isn't anything compared to Fremont, CA.
You have to remember that the 27 dollar figure is what the average UAW worker makes in the US, not just Flint. BTW, the 5000+ UAW workers that work at the NUMMI plant are paid on average 32 dollars an hour.

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/num...ing-uaw-plant/

Originally Posted by joltdudeuc
$73 with benefits is also something that one can't really dismiss. That's substantial!
It is substantial, which is why they negotiated it down a little bit with the deal that went through last year. Now the UAW itself is paying for it's retiree's health care, and the cost will go down to around 50 an hour between 2009-2010, which is much more competitive with Toyota which pays around 47 dollars an hour in the States.

http://www.parapundit.com/archives/004670.html
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #56  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by SilverScoober02
You have to remember that the 27 dollar figure is what the average UAW worker makes in the US, not just Flint. BTW, the 5000+ UAW workers that work at the NUMMI plant are paid on average 32 dollars an hour.

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/num...ing-uaw-plant/



It is substantial, which is why they negotiated it down a little bit with the deal that went through last year. Now the UAW itself is paying for it's retiree's health care, and the cost will go down to around 50 an hour between 2009-2010, which is much more competitive with Toyota which pays around 47 dollars an hour in the States.

http://www.parapundit.com/archives/004670.html
The Nummi plant is right in the middle of one of the most expensive places to live in the US! Paying $32/hr there makes sense compared the typical worker elsewhere. Big three plants are in areas where the cost of living is pretty low. The Nummi plant is giving a pretty healthy wage that is probably sustainable here for this employees. $27/hr in the mid west makes that wage very healthy considering the cost of home ownership there for example.
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #57  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/toy...utives-salary/

So the top 10 execs at Toyota, the biggest car company on earth today... make only 40.5 Millions between them, which is LESS than any of the 3 CEO's, as individuals, make for the US three companies....

****ing sickening...
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #58  
SilverScoober02's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,064
From: Detroit, Where the weak are killed and eaten...
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX Sedan & 2008 GMC Sierra 4x4
Originally Posted by joltdudeuc
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/toy...utives-salary/

So the top 10 execs at Toyota, the biggest car company on earth today... make only 40.5 Millions between them, which is LESS than any of the 3 CEO's, as individuals, make for the US three companies....

****ing sickening...
You'll never get an argument from me on CEO pay. It's absolutely asinine what CEO's make. It's not just the Big three though, CEO salary in almost every large American industry is way over the top.

I know that labor costs are only 10 percent of the total cost of a GM vehicle. I wonder what percentage wagoner's salary is?
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 11:37 AM
  #59  
FW Motorsports's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Originally Posted by joltdudeuc
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/toy...utives-salary/

So the top 10 execs at Toyota, the biggest car company on earth today... make only 40.5 Millions between them, which is LESS than any of the 3 CEO's, as individuals, make for the US three companies....

****ing sickening...
Why is it sickening?
If your boss started paying you 3X what you're getting paid now, would you complain?

I'm more concerned that not one member of Congress has introduced legislation to reduce their pay.
Old Nov 20, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #60  
joltdudeuc's Avatar
Old School
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 14,983
From: Union City
Car Info: '99 RBP GM6
Originally Posted by Paul@dbtuned
Why is it sickening?
If your boss started paying you 3X what you're getting paid now, would you complain?

I'm more concerned that not one member of Congress has introduced legislation to reduce their pay.
That 3 CEOs make at least $120 Million vs 10 the top ten execs at Toyota making $40 million combined.

Yet toyota is the biggest auto company in the world, it's the one that is going to easily make it out of this next year alive and well, and it's the 3 US companies that are in front of Congress begging for a bailout.

I find it sickening that those CEOs are paid that much for running poor companies, yet, the top 10 (including ceo) of toyota, which is VERY successful, are paid 1/3 of that... combined!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:24 AM.