JIC vs Cusco Lower Arm Braces
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,641
From: Bay Area, CA
Car Info: 2009 G Ride
JIC vs Cusco Lower Arm Braces
So I have decided to get one of these bars for my car and I was just curious as to what everyone's opinions were on them and which one is "better". They both seem to be very similar and within the same price range (for me at least), so which one do you guys like better?
Pictures courtesy of Vivid Racing:
JIC:
Cusco:
Pictures courtesy of Vivid Racing:
JIC:
Cusco:
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 857
From: -----------------
Car Info: .............................................................................
It's all about the $$$....whichever one is cheaper.
The upper picture is NOT a Subaru.
The lower pictured arm bar(which I have) will not fit if the 'U-brace' is removed(mine is removed) without shimming the foreward attach points. I would like to get one that fits with the 'U-brace' removed and no shimming.
The upper picture is NOT a Subaru.
The lower pictured arm bar(which I have) will not fit if the 'U-brace' is removed(mine is removed) without shimming the foreward attach points. I would like to get one that fits with the 'U-brace' removed and no shimming.
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,341
From: your friendly neighborhood hairpin
Car Info: '03 PSM Sedan
Uncle Scotty,
what exactly did the bar do for that car's handling? i'm curious, since i've haven't heard anything from anyone running one of these. mos people i know have opted for an ALK instead... just curious, not hijacking the thread.
what exactly did the bar do for that car's handling? i'm curious, since i've haven't heard anything from anyone running one of these. mos people i know have opted for an ALK instead... just curious, not hijacking the thread.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 857
From: -----------------
Car Info: .............................................................................
Opting for an ALK instead of the lower brace is like opting for cookies instead of gasoline.....they are entirely different things.
The lower arm bar increases chassis rigidity while the ALK alters chassis geometry and bushing stiffness.
The arm bar makes the car 'point' better, and feel less 'sloppy'.
Get both, be :banana: :banana: :banana:
The lower arm bar increases chassis rigidity while the ALK alters chassis geometry and bushing stiffness.
The arm bar makes the car 'point' better, and feel less 'sloppy'.
Get both, be :banana: :banana: :banana:
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 857
From: -----------------
Car Info: .............................................................................
Originally posted by AWD 20T
What U-brace are you referring to, and why did you remove it?
What U-brace are you referring to, and why did you remove it?
Dahveed aka Robin Hood
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,793
From: Robbin' the Hood (Claycord)
Car Info: (RIP) '04 STi Silver
removing the subframe will weaken the front-end in the event of a frontal collision, do it at your own risk.
the Cusco V2 brace can be used with their V1 brace, and can be used with ALK by shimming up the front mouting points.
I used to have a custom, one-off brace on my old WRX, it was fully-triangulated, and connected the subframe to the frame rails.
It made a big difference to the steering, in turns and freeway tracking as well.
the Cusco V2 brace can be used with their V1 brace, and can be used with ALK by shimming up the front mouting points.
I used to have a custom, one-off brace on my old WRX, it was fully-triangulated, and connected the subframe to the frame rails.
It made a big difference to the steering, in turns and freeway tracking as well.
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,341
From: your friendly neighborhood hairpin
Car Info: '03 PSM Sedan
huh, for some reason i thought that the cusco bar couldn't be run with the ALK. if it can, i can definitely see the benefits of fitting it to the car, though it would be nice to be able to keep the subframe....
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 857
From: -----------------
Car Info: .............................................................................
Originally posted by dropkick_muppet
huh, for some reason i thought that the cusco bar couldn't be run with the ALK. if it can, i can definitely see the benefits of fitting it to the car, though it would be nice to be able to keep the subframe....
huh, for some reason i thought that the cusco bar couldn't be run with the ALK. if it can, i can definitely see the benefits of fitting it to the car, though it would be nice to be able to keep the subframe....
This is difficult to explain, because of all the possible combinations of hardware, but any one piece or any combination is possible.
It would seem that there are several versions of the Cusco bar and other hardware, and I could type for a week and never be able to make anybody understand the what and why....sorry, but it is pointless to try.
Originally posted by AWD 20T
Well since no one really has any comments on the JIC, I guess I'll have to buy it and try it for myself...
Well since no one really has any comments on the JIC, I guess I'll have to buy it and try it for myself...
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 308
From: East Bay
Car Info: 04 STi & an autox Lemming
Originally posted by Uncle Scotty
It's all about the $$$....whichever one is cheaper.
The upper picture is NOT a Subaru.
It's all about the $$$....whichever one is cheaper.
The upper picture is NOT a Subaru.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 857
From: -----------------
Car Info: .............................................................................
Originally posted by wm07
It is a Subaru, notice the STi alumimum front contral arms? the exhaust pipe doesn't look like it's USDM OEM parts but it is definately a Subaru.
It is a Subaru, notice the STi alumimum front contral arms? the exhaust pipe doesn't look like it's USDM OEM parts but it is definately a Subaru.