BC Coilovers VS Stance Coilovers
01-21-2007, 07:38 PM
#1
BC Coilovers VS Stance Coilovers
I will be getting one of these, I am just not sure which one yet. I am leaning towards the BC's because they are 1k vs ~1.35k and they look like they are both rebuildable. The stance's seem to have bigger valving, but the BC's have 2x as much dampening settings and they are both monotube. On import image's site it says that the BC's have front pillowball mounts and the rear are rubber mounts. Is there a downside to rear rubber mounts? Is that standard? I don't know much about this topic. I assume pillowball is good.
Help me make a good decision, I don't want to get stuck with crappy coilovers. Why should I, or should I not buy one or the other? Personal experiences would be great feedback
. Thanks!
Help me make a good decision, I don't want to get stuck with crappy coilovers. Why should I, or should I not buy one or the other? Personal experiences would be great feedback
. Thanks!
01-21-2007, 11:43 PM
#2
Chicks dig me. April Fool's!
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 10,989
Car Info: 1997 Impreza, 2014 BRZ
Might want to take a look at this review for the BC's.
http://www.iwsti.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68272
http://www.iwsti.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68272
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MachIII
Suspension / Brakes / Handling / Wheels / Tires
22
01-09-2007 10:06 AM
LongLiveGDB
Suspension, Handling, and Brakes
12
09-21-2006 01:32 PM
