My last "They didn't go moon trip".
09-11-2007, 01:22 PM
#272
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Union City/San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 4,682
Car Info: The Thundercougarfalconbird
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/p....html?d=122412
should've attended this.
And I'm with Mr. X on this to be honest. If you find an actual engineer from NASA (or Northrop/TRW) that says the designs and engineering were an elaborate scheme with the Soviets or that the whole thing was faked in a studio on Earth, then i'll pretty much stand corrected on everything I've said till now.
should've attended this.
And I'm with Mr. X on this to be honest. If you find an actual engineer from NASA (or Northrop/TRW) that says the designs and engineering were an elaborate scheme with the Soviets or that the whole thing was faked in a studio on Earth, then i'll pretty much stand corrected on everything I've said till now.
Last edited by samurai; 09-11-2007 at 01:27 PM.
09-11-2007, 01:43 PM
#273
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/p....html?d=122412
should've attended this.
And I'm with Mr. X on this to be honest. If you find an actual engineer from NASA (or Northrop/TRW) that says the designs and engineering were an elaborate scheme with the Soviets or that the whole thing was faked in a studio on Earth, then i'll pretty much stand corrected on everything I've said till now.
should've attended this.
And I'm with Mr. X on this to be honest. If you find an actual engineer from NASA (or Northrop/TRW) that says the designs and engineering were an elaborate scheme with the Soviets or that the whole thing was faked in a studio on Earth, then i'll pretty much stand corrected on everything I've said till now.
tim did you return the vaccume ?
is your cube clean now?
09-11-2007, 01:50 PM
#274
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 996
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/p....html?d=122412
should've attended this.
And I'm with Mr. X on this to be honest. If you find an actual engineer from NASA (or Northrop/TRW) that says the designs and engineering were an elaborate scheme with the Soviets or that the whole thing was faked in a studio on Earth, then i'll pretty much stand corrected on everything I've said till now.
should've attended this.
And I'm with Mr. X on this to be honest. If you find an actual engineer from NASA (or Northrop/TRW) that says the designs and engineering were an elaborate scheme with the Soviets or that the whole thing was faked in a studio on Earth, then i'll pretty much stand corrected on everything I've said till now.
I am seeing that your mindset does not support deductive reasoning. You should not base your thought and beliefs on hear say. Having someone from NASA to profess a hoax should not be the driver in your decision.
I will make a comment on the Pearl Harbor attack on my new thread Pearl Harbor.
See you there.
09-11-2007, 02:04 PM
#279
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Union City/San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 4,682
Car Info: The Thundercougarfalconbird
I base my reasoning on the technology of the day, the purpose of the mission and the evidence presented in the photos. The missing tracks are equivalent to finding a drop of water somewhere in the photo. There are things that should be and things that should not. The tracks are a physical anomaly that should be in the photos.
I am seeing that your mindset does not support deductive reasoning. You should not base your thought and beliefs on hear say. Having someone from NASA to profess a hoax should not be the driver in your decision.
I will make a comment on the Pearl Harbor attack on my new thread Pearl Harbor.
See you there.
I am seeing that your mindset does not support deductive reasoning. You should not base your thought and beliefs on hear say. Having someone from NASA to profess a hoax should not be the driver in your decision.
I will make a comment on the Pearl Harbor attack on my new thread Pearl Harbor.
See you there.
Nice debating with you.
Last edited by samurai; 09-11-2007 at 02:07 PM.
09-11-2007, 02:09 PM
#281
As did I. Mine is on the engineering reasoning and its not really hear-say. If you think the results and data they took separate from the lunar landings and basic engineering legwork is hear-say then there is nothing further I can say to you. All the stuff is based on engineering principles and engineering thought processes I know of and how I applied them to the pics. Nothing more. This is while yours is trying to disprove my predicts with nothing more than reasoning that can only be proven on earth and not on the moon.
Nice debating with you.
Nice debating with you.
09-11-2007, 02:18 PM
#284
VIP Member
well i was telling sigma pi, that my friends dad work on a couple of the programs that went to to moon. I'll grab some insight from him then i suppose maybe does anyone care?