My last "They didn't go moon trip".
09-05-2007, 02:22 PM
#136
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 996
perhaps, but you're not going to tell an astronaut that went to the moon to drive exactly at the same speed all the time. Some times, they gunned it, sometimes they kept it slow, sometimes it was loaded with one person, etc etc etc. It all makes a diff in a reduced grav field. Also, note that they were going up on a hill here. I would think it would be as hard to skip going up a hill on earth as well as the moon.
samurai, I think you need to stop now
Last edited by Ichinobu; 09-05-2007 at 02:26 PM.
09-05-2007, 02:39 PM
#137
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Union City/San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 4,682
Car Info: The Thundercougarfalconbird
dynamics of car going up dirt hill =/= dynamics of car going on a flat dirt surface.
I think you in turn need to stop believing wacko librarians and conspiracy theorists who are crackpots in nature who know just know key phrases and catch terms and talk to some engineers who worked on the Apollo LM. Those are the guys who did the work and know that thing from top to bottom. You and I never went to the moon and only have these pics to believe. As for me, unlike you, I trust the engineers and what they did and they set forth what is the space industry today. If they say they did it, then i sure as hell believe that they did.
09-05-2007, 03:29 PM
#140
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: running track
Posts: 3,018
Car Info: 2004 Wagon
On a side note... on Earth at least, the way you walk has a lot to do with the kind of foot print you make. Body Weight Distribution, the musle you use to walk, and the way you pick up your feet are some of the factor that determine the foot print that you are going to leave and the amount of traction you have when walking up hill on sandy stuff. I am no engineer but I hike probably 200-300 miles a year. This has nothing to do with the discussion but I just want to sound intelligent =)
09-05-2007, 03:38 PM
#143
09-05-2007, 03:40 PM
#144
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Union City/San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 4,682
Car Info: The Thundercougarfalconbird
Here is a fresh angle though I'm sticking to my story about the tracks and the construction and the dirt.
I'm not a geological expert, but here is NASA's take on the "rocks were fabricated" theory and would probably debunk everything said here. There is literally no way to "fake" a moon rock.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm
I'm not a geological expert, but here is NASA's take on the "rocks were fabricated" theory and would probably debunk everything said here. There is literally no way to "fake" a moon rock.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm
09-05-2007, 03:41 PM
#145
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Union City/San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 4,682
Car Info: The Thundercougarfalconbird
If it launched airborne at a higher speed, sure. Grav field is much less than what you'd find on earth. There was an overhead video of an astronaut doing a wheelie.
09-05-2007, 03:45 PM
#147
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UCIrvine
Posts: 3,312
Car Info: '05 Crystal Grey Metallic WRX Sport Wagon
HA. I do know about 'taht'. I see a faint track in the earlier picture (post at 1pm), behind the right front tire towards the inboard side. In the 'moving' picture, dust is obscuring the area just behind the wheels, and other than that I see no print.
I suppose my point overall with this is that tracks left by feet and vehicles are variable everywhere, including the moon. The presence or absence of obvious tracks in these pictures cannot be used to proove or disproove that they were on the moon.
Furthermore, the most compeling evidence about the trip to the moon is listed in the myriad links posted early in this thread that debunk all of the hoax theories. The piece that most impresses me is the presence of laser reflectors on the moon in the exact locations that our astronauts landed and set up their stuff...both gov't and private entities have used the reflectors for measurments and research, and their existance is certain.
Last edited by MVWRX; 09-05-2007 at 03:51 PM.
09-05-2007, 03:54 PM
#148
BanHammer™
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Wagonmafia Propaganda Lieutenant
Posts: 47,585
Car Info: 2001 Forester RS2 SPEC-F
STUPID THEORY AHOY!
lets say nasa did fake the moon landing. Do you think with everything they did, down to the last detail, the one thing they would overlook would be the tire tracks?
why would they drag and drop the vehicles with a crane? why would they not have just drove or pushed the vehicles into position for the shots, which would create the tire tracks?
do you think that there is something odd about the moon, because..you know.. its not the earth, that causes tire tracks to disappear or be very faint?
If this was a conspiracy, I think they would have made sure there were tracks. They did land, so they don't care if they were there or not, they are missing for some odd reason, more then likely BECAUSE THEY WERE ON THE MOON!
lets say nasa did fake the moon landing. Do you think with everything they did, down to the last detail, the one thing they would overlook would be the tire tracks?
why would they drag and drop the vehicles with a crane? why would they not have just drove or pushed the vehicles into position for the shots, which would create the tire tracks?
do you think that there is something odd about the moon, because..you know.. its not the earth, that causes tire tracks to disappear or be very faint?
If this was a conspiracy, I think they would have made sure there were tracks. They did land, so they don't care if they were there or not, they are missing for some odd reason, more then likely BECAUSE THEY WERE ON THE MOON!
09-05-2007, 03:58 PM
#149
Here is a fresh angle though I'm sticking to my story about the tracks and the construction and the dirt.
I'm not a geological expert, but here is NASA's take on the "rocks were fabricated" theory and would probably debunk everything said here. There is literally no way to "fake" a moon rock.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm
I'm not a geological expert, but here is NASA's take on the "rocks were fabricated" theory and would probably debunk everything said here. There is literally no way to "fake" a moon rock.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm
you know this guy is a son of a ***** liar
"Moon rocks are absolutely unique," says Dr. David McKay
look at his last name and it says Dr infront of it hahhaa
09-05-2007, 04:03 PM
#150
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuck somewhere in traffic
Posts: 6,403
Car Info: 06 wrx