So ATT is pissin' me off...
10-26-2007, 02:50 PM
#18
10-26-2007, 02:53 PM
#19
VIP Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: pew, pew, pew!!!
Posts: 17,617
Car Info: nonplussed
I think that we are getting caught in a argument of semantics.
someone said something about sucking reproductive organs.
you said doesn't everybody
someone said you were gay
you referenced chowing box
I said chowing box is not sucking reproductive organs
you said it is.
my point is to suck reproductive organs, you would have to suck on the actual reproductive organs - the reproductive organs are inside on women.
The ovaries are responsible for reproduction and the uterus houses the fetus.
chowing box implies sucking or "chowing" on the labia majora and/or minora or on the clitoris, none of which are the organs responsible for reproduction. If anything they would be considered part of the body's largest organ, the skin.
See now, wasn't that fun?
someone said something about sucking reproductive organs.
you said doesn't everybody
someone said you were gay
you referenced chowing box
I said chowing box is not sucking reproductive organs
you said it is.
my point is to suck reproductive organs, you would have to suck on the actual reproductive organs - the reproductive organs are inside on women.
The ovaries are responsible for reproduction and the uterus houses the fetus.
chowing box implies sucking or "chowing" on the labia majora and/or minora or on the clitoris, none of which are the organs responsible for reproduction. If anything they would be considered part of the body's largest organ, the skin.
See now, wasn't that fun?
10-26-2007, 03:03 PM
#23
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 18,369
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Hooray!
Which means a *****, since he's being critical, correct?
Because "reproductive organs" would include both sexes.
Truly a notable event in this forum!
I should do that more often.
And to do so on a man would be jsut as difficult, as the testes are (usually) located inside the ugliest flap of skin possible in this universe.
Uh huh.
"reproduction" meaning "procreation" would most certainly require a vag. Would you want to make babies with anyone who did not possess a vagina?
Which means a *****, since he's being critical, correct?
Because "reproductive organs" would include both sexes.
Truly a notable event in this forum!
I should do that more often.
10-26-2007, 03:07 PM
#24
Troll
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In SoggyNoodles Low Rise Pants
Posts: 15,877
Car Info: 2008 Legacy Spec-B
Hooray!
Which means a *****, since he's being critical, correct?
Because "reproductive organs" would include both sexes.
Truly a notable event in this forum!
I should do that more often.
And to do so on a man would be jsut as difficult, as the testes are (usually) located inside the ugliest flap of skin possible in this universe.
Uh huh.
"reproduction" meaning "procreation" would most certainly require a vag. Would you want to make babies with anyone who did not possess a vagina?
Which means a *****, since he's being critical, correct?
Because "reproductive organs" would include both sexes.
Truly a notable event in this forum!
I should do that more often.
And to do so on a man would be jsut as difficult, as the testes are (usually) located inside the ugliest flap of skin possible in this universe.
Uh huh.
"reproduction" meaning "procreation" would most certainly require a vag. Would you want to make babies with anyone who did not possess a vagina?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
