Originally Posted by Rev. Rob Large

they are "far less stable, less reliable and, above all, far less secure than IE."

I. ****. you. not.

Originally Posted by Rev. Rob Large

As a quaint little aside, we had to fight for that 16 GB of RAM as an upgrade from the 4 GB it came with. Our justification, "Additional RAM is required to support the dual-monitor displays".

Originally Posted by UnderTheRadar

Originally Posted by stupidchicken03

lul wut

Originally Posted by Rev. Rob Large

To give you an idea of the "quality" of personnel we have over there, the branch manager (the head honcho, big cheese, THE person in charge) of IT has only a high school diploma--no post-secondary education, no specialty or vocational education in information technology, computer science, etc. She has been with branch since Christ was a Corporal and somehow maneuvered her way into that position, presumably through exchanges of various sexual favors because God knows it was based on her technical expertise in the field. She runs it like her own little self-identified theocracy.

To put it concisely: this very woman issued a Department-wide memorandum "forbidding" us to install firefox or chrome on our machines because they are "far less stable, less reliable and, above all, far less secure than IE."

I. ****. you. not.

Originally Posted by Heedz

Focus is getting a bit of a treat today. Intercooler. Downpipe and such if theres time.

Originally Posted by Rev. Rob Large

I don't know which was worse: the depth to which we had to stoop to come up with just a completely asinine reason for justification, or the fact that she bought and believed it.