know what sucks?
Thread Starter
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
say you have some property thats completely surrounded by another persons property. they have to allow to you travel across their land to reach yours. preventing you from doing so in anyway is considered a trespass.
do you really think the cops would have come if it wasn't within my rights? i fully explained the situation to both rancho pd and CHP and both said they would send a cruiser out to have the car towed.
QED
Warm Fuzzy Admin
iTrader: (45)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,799
From: Sacramento, CA
Car Info: 97 LOB, 05 FXT, 03 Tundra
I'm aware, just thought it was a funny hypothetical given that fact.
And, if I was at IX's house, and he parked behind me and wouldn't move, I'd sure as hell call the cops to tow his car as he'd be restricting my mobility, and, more importantly, my property. If I have to leave my possessions on an individual's property through their intended actions with no posted signage or inferred risk, that's theft on a basic level in addition to the kidnapping that IX references.
And, if I was at IX's house, and he parked behind me and wouldn't move, I'd sure as hell call the cops to tow his car as he'd be restricting my mobility, and, more importantly, my property. If I have to leave my possessions on an individual's property through their intended actions with no posted signage or inferred risk, that's theft on a basic level in addition to the kidnapping that IX references.
Is this not essentially the same thing? Excepte it's a parking spot instead of a driveway? As a tenant is she not paying for the legal right to that spot?
And, if I was at IX's house, and he parked behind me and wouldn't move, I'd sure as hell call the cops to tow his car as he'd be restricting my mobility, and, more importantly, my property. If I have to leave my possessions on an individual's property through their intended actions with no posted signage or inferred risk, that's theft on a basic level in addition to the kidnapping that IX references.
Troll
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,877
From: In SoggyNoodles Low Rise Pants
Car Info: 2008 Legacy Spec-B
No, not blocking you in your own driveway, you block someone in your driveway. So I park there, and say I live a few houses down (for sake of the example), and you come home, get pissed, so you park behind me, preventing me from backing out of your driveway.
Is this not essentially the same thing? Excepte it's a parking spot instead of a driveway? As a tenant is she not paying for the legal right to that spot?
Is this not essentially the same thing? Excepte it's a parking spot instead of a driveway? As a tenant is she not paying for the legal right to that spot?
you aren't legaly allowed to impede someone from moving their car regardless of who's property you are on unless it's in a citizens arrest scenario(like if they hit someone and you block them in). Even then I think if they wanted to throw the book at you, you could get into trouble for blocking them in
Thread Starter
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
No, not blocking you in your own driveway, you block someone in your driveway. So I park there, and say I live a few houses down (for sake of the example), and you come home, get pissed, so you park behind me, preventing me from backing out of your driveway.
Is this not essentially the same thing? Excepte it's a parking spot instead of a driveway? As a tenant is she not paying for the legal right to that spot?
Is this not essentially the same thing? Excepte it's a parking spot instead of a driveway? As a tenant is she not paying for the legal right to that spot?
CVC 22500. No person shall stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle whether attended or unattended, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a peace officer or official traffic control device, in any of the following places:
(e) In front of a public or private driveway, except that a bus engaged as a common carrier, schoolbus, or a taxicab may stop to load or unload passengers when authorized by local authorities pursuant to an ordinance.
Signage, good point. I would assume that at the entrance to the apartment complex's parking lot there is a sign that says something along the lines of Parking by permit only, all other park in visitor area. All violators will be towed at vehicle owner's expense." Or something along those lines.
god damn. please go back to ESL.
VIP Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,351
From: pompous douchebag
Car Info: $200,000 sports car
Signage, good point. I would assume that at the entrance to the apartment complex's parking lot there is a sign that says something along the lines of Parking by permit only, all other park in visitor area. All violators will be towed at vehicle owner's expense." Or something along those lines.
Actually it was only posted once, but thanks, I thought it was. Therefore I rescind all my arguements. I totally thought this was someone's reserved spot at an apartment complex. I apologize. It's always one word or post that brings me down.
Last edited by jvick125; Nov 26, 2007 at 12:39 PM.
Thread Starter
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy



