CF trunk help
#16
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 12.88@102.27mph w/ 1.5 60ft no tune, no problem!
Posts: 1,851
Car Info: 02 wrx
dude the diffrence with the carbon trunk and the aluminum trunk is three hour trip to the gym, but of course, i bought it for looks, i didn't need anymore weight reduction to go faster
#17
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,176
Car Info: 2016 Z51 C7, 2007 Exige S, 2008 ZX-10R, 2016 Taco
Originally Posted by STiNightFall
dude the diffrence with the carbon trunk and the aluminum trunk is three hour trip to the gym, but of course, i bought it for looks, i didn't need anymore weight reduction to go faster
San
#18
Originally Posted by STiNightFall
dude the diffrence with the carbon trunk and the aluminum trunk is three hour trip to the gym, but of course, i bought it for looks, i didn't need anymore weight reduction to go faster
#19
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: rightBehindYou, HI
Posts: 7,783
Car Info: 1973 Huevo Ranchero
Originally Posted by oldmansan
Weight reduction is always a plus. Period... All things being equal, a 2500 pound car is going to "pound" a 3000 pound car. You have to decide if your car is more show or more go. You also have to decide where you'll compromise one for the other.
San
San
aloha from the summit of *-^-mauna kea-^-*
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigworm
NorCal Classifieds
0
10-25-2005 12:51 PM
maaw
Bay Area
9
05-18-2005 03:04 PM
blkSTi04
Used Aftermarket Car Parts For Sale
0
06-14-2004 01:36 PM