Can you read EGT from.........
Yes you can read off the downpipe. But the temp difference from the downpipe compared to having it in the manifold is upwards of 200 degrees I have heard.
As far as Cylinder 3 being a bad cylinder... That is very debatable and many many people have been burning up number 4 ring lands. The thought is that since the turbo is there, there is extra heat on that cylinder. The reasoning for choosing #3 is because it's the last cylinder on the fuel rail, so it should be the leanest.
I say put the EGT in the uppipe and just measure the total EGT vs just an individual cylinder. I seem to recall my first Autometer was in #3, but now my Greddy is in the collector of my header.
As far as Cylinder 3 being a bad cylinder... That is very debatable and many many people have been burning up number 4 ring lands. The thought is that since the turbo is there, there is extra heat on that cylinder. The reasoning for choosing #3 is because it's the last cylinder on the fuel rail, so it should be the leanest.
I say put the EGT in the uppipe and just measure the total EGT vs just an individual cylinder. I seem to recall my first Autometer was in #3, but now my Greddy is in the collector of my header.
Last edited by teiva-boy; Jun 18, 2003 at 10:09 AM.
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
I don't see the point of normalizing the readings (lumping them together). I'd do #4 near the exhaust port as it seems to be the new "hot spot".
What's the point of knowing your EGT if it's not telling you what's going on? (A general trend isn't good enough IMHO).
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
What's the point of knowing your EGT if it's not telling you what's going on? (A general trend isn't good enough IMHO).
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Originally posted by IS2Scooby
I don't see the point of normalizing the readings (lumping them together). I'd do #4 near the exhaust port as it seems to be the new "hot spot".
I don't see the point of normalizing the readings (lumping them together). I'd do #4 near the exhaust port as it seems to be the new "hot spot".
What's the point of knowing your EGT if it's not telling you what's going on? (A general trend isn't good enough IMHO).
Well need to just pucker up and buy a TEC III and have individual EGT's for each cylinder.
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
The #3 was the hot spot on the naturally aspirated EJ's... The #4 has always been the tube that goes down on the high boost boxers, AFAIK. I think it has more to do with intake manifold air flow than a lack of fuel. It also has to do with the rear cylinders being on the end of the coolant flow where things tend to puddle up in the cylinder head.
Figuring out which cylinder fails the most and putting the EGT probe on that cylinder isn't lumping things together. It's assuming that if #4 is cool (within spec) the rest have to be. Of course is something goes awry in another cylinder you won't know - but there's less chance of that than #4 running lean.
Just IMHO of course.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Figuring out which cylinder fails the most and putting the EGT probe on that cylinder isn't lumping things together. It's assuming that if #4 is cool (within spec) the rest have to be. Of course is something goes awry in another cylinder you won't know - but there's less chance of that than #4 running lean.
Just IMHO of course.

__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Pr0n King
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,618
From: The Land of Rocks
Car Info: Turncoat Turbo
Ed (sub-sonic) mentioned that most (if not all) of the motors he's seen go at the dealership were #4.
A engine failure registry on another forum shows 90% fail in #4. The other couple are #1 and #3. Nobody has dropped #2 that I know of.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
A engine failure registry on another forum shows 90% fail in #4. The other couple are #1 and #3. Nobody has dropped #2 that I know of.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,224
From: Honolulu, HI
Car Info: 1991 Toyota MR-2 Turbo
Interesting discussion. The MR-2 community had the #3 cylinder being the weak link. Initially it was thought that the fuel rail was to blame, then the intake manifold and then cooling through the cylinder head was also looked at. IMO all 3 factors required some attention so I made a dual entry fuel rail, extrude honed the intake manifold and had the coolant passages enlarged on the head. I also looked into Evans NPG+ coolant (http://www.evanscooling.com) but the jury is still out on that one.
I will be installing a host of gauges before I start any major mods. I like getting baseline info on intake temp, EGT, boost, fuel pressure and oil pressure with the car still stock.
I will be installing a host of gauges before I start any major mods. I like getting baseline info on intake temp, EGT, boost, fuel pressure and oil pressure with the car still stock.
Thread Starter
Angry Dan
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,183
From: www.turboculture.com
Car Info: 05 Evo VIII
Wanta see who can be the 1st #2 go bad?
I just thought it would be cool to do the down-pipe and EGT together. But if it's not going to tell me what I want to know then F-it.
I just thought it would be cool to do the down-pipe and EGT together. But if it's not going to tell me what I want to know then F-it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spdkills
Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM)
4
Jan 25, 2003 03:48 PM



