USDM '04 STI EJ25 VS. USDM Forester XT EJ25, what is the difference
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,659
From: Okinawa, Japan
Car Info: 1996 STI V3 Type RA
USDM '04 STI EJ25 VS. USDM Forester XT EJ25, what is the difference
Okay I am about to pick up a EJ25 Forester XT engine to transplant into my 1998 2.5 RS, and I wanted to know what the difference is between the XT and the STI engine. I am basically refering to internals since I know the turbo/ intercooler differences that exist.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by keirnna
Okay I am about to pick up a EJ25 Forester XT engine to transplant into my 1998 2.5 RS, and I wanted to know what the difference is between the XT and the STI engine. I am basically refering to internals since I know the turbo/ intercooler differences that exist.
Guest
Posts: n/a
It appears that the shortblock is 100% the same. Longblock is near the same...maybe some minor differences.
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...t=forester+sti
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...t=forester+sti
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...t=forester+sti
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...t=forester+sti
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yeah...it was a good move on SOA to have a near identical block used in multiple cars. Parts, availabity, and cost wont be as big of an issue for us since the block is more common.
Good luck with your swap. Are you going with bigger injectors, turbo etc?
Good luck with your swap. Are you going with bigger injectors, turbo etc?
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,539
From: Farnborough, Hants
Car Info: the blue bucket
Originally Posted by BAN SUVS
In a nutshell, differences are turbo, uppipe, intercooler, cams, and ECU tuning. Short block is identical, headcastings are identical.
Mike
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,369
From: Reno, NV
Car Info: 1993/2000/2001 GF4 mostly red
Nothing concrete, just anecdotal. With the different turbos, it would make sense for Subaru to develop seperate cams for emissions and fuel economy purposes, as well as the extra emphasis the Forester has on torque and low boost threshold. I'll make some inquiries. I hadn't yet heard about the casting difference, that suprises me. I can't think of any reason to make changes to those.
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,539
From: Farnborough, Hants
Car Info: the blue bucket
I think the emissions and fuel economy is taken care of by the remapping of the ECU rather than different cam profiling although I am not 100% sure (I can look at the stock mapping tomorrow to see what it shows).
We have a couple of FXT motors at the shop and more importantly one in a car with a vf34 setup (WRX) so when the owner gets through breaking it in we should see how well it performs in comparison to the STI motor (on cars with similar mods).
Mike
We have a couple of FXT motors at the shop and more importantly one in a car with a vf34 setup (WRX) so when the owner gets through breaking it in we should see how well it performs in comparison to the STI motor (on cars with similar mods).
Mike
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,539
From: Farnborough, Hants
Car Info: the blue bucket
Here's the cam pickup bracket required when using a FXT (or some STI) long blocks in a WRX when trying not to rewire the ECU and add the peddle box and associated equipment for DBW.
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,659
From: Okinawa, Japan
Car Info: 1996 STI V3 Type RA
Well after talking with the APS guy today, I have a totally different plan for my car. I think I will be selling my RS to my younger sister, so she can race it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheFozz
Bay Area
6
Aug 16, 2013 12:03 PM
EJ_20
Engine/Power - non turbo (All non turbo Imprezas)
0
Jul 22, 2006 01:23 AM
Subaru_Master
Aftermarket Forced Induction - Turboed factory NA engines
0
Aug 17, 2005 12:51 PM
Ayanamieve
Engine/Power - non turbo (All non turbo Imprezas)
3
May 31, 2004 09:16 PM




