Meth vs e85
#31
Originally Posted by scoobiedubiedoo
I have a Cobb acessport with 93/e85 and I love e85 you really do feel the power gain. E85 I get 210 miles per tank , and 250 miles per tank on 93 . But since e85 is cheaper it is around the same thing and switching is as easy as clicking a button
#32
Registered User
iTrader: (46)
i don't remember too long ago. +20 hp +40 tq? on a mustang
i drive pretty conservative about 25 mpg
it was the only option at the time. just too lazy to remove all the crap off my car and no one tunes ecutek anymore or else i would be driving a stock subaru. i regret ever modding the stupid thing. waste of money.
e85 is the new rage. "cheap race fuel". i'd probably go e85 since it's easier. don't have to mount a methanol kit (i don't even know if kits are still available).
#33
Originally Posted by 03_Impreza_Al
i buy a 5 gal jug $32 every 3 months or so.
i don't remember too long ago. +20 hp +40 tq? on a mustang
i drive pretty conservative about 25 mpg
it was the only option at the time. just too lazy to remove all the crap off my car and no one tunes ecutek anymore or else i would be driving a stock subaru. i regret ever modding the stupid thing. waste of money.
e85 is the new rage. "cheap race fuel". i'd probably go e85 since it's easier. don't have to mount a methanol kit (i don't even know if kits are still available).
Thanks for the input folks! Helps a lot!
#34
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Oahu, Ewa beach
Posts: 782
Car Info: 06 Subaru WRX STI
i buy a 5 gal jug $32 every 3 months or so.
i don't remember too long ago. +20 hp +40 tq? on a mustang
i drive pretty conservative about 25 mpg
it was the only option at the time. just too lazy to remove all the crap off my car and no one tunes ecutek anymore or else i would be driving a stock subaru. i regret ever modding the stupid thing. waste of money.
e85 is the new rage. "cheap race fuel". i'd probably go e85 since it's easier. don't have to mount a methanol kit (i don't even know if kits are still available).
i don't remember too long ago. +20 hp +40 tq? on a mustang
i drive pretty conservative about 25 mpg
it was the only option at the time. just too lazy to remove all the crap off my car and no one tunes ecutek anymore or else i would be driving a stock subaru. i regret ever modding the stupid thing. waste of money.
e85 is the new rage. "cheap race fuel". i'd probably go e85 since it's easier. don't have to mount a methanol kit (i don't even know if kits are still available).
#35
Registered User
I dont think you will get more power from e85 but you will make "safe" power, I was told my car lost around 60hp when it was switched over due to fuel injector selection currently available, it was 578hp with meth 489hp on 91 no meth before the e85 switch.... as for gas mileage I just got 17.2mpg on my last tank and i defiantly ripped it a few times on that tank so i would say i could get 18.5-19mpg if i totally babied it, pulling 426hp on dyno @15.5 psi.......... and its $3 a gallon and smells good when it dumps out the wastegates
Last edited by DJ_Sniffles; 08-07-2013 at 11:25 AM.
#36
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
I dont think you will get more power from e85 but you will make "safe" power, I was told my car lost around 60hp when it was switched over due to fuel injector selection currently available, it was 578hp with meth 489hp on 91 no meth before the e85 switch.... as for gas mileage I just got 17.2mpg on my last tank and i defiantly ripped it a few times on that tank so i would say i could get 18.5-19mpg if i totally babied it, pulling 426hp on dyno @15.5 psi.......... and its $3 a gallon and smells good when it dumps out the wastegates
-- Ed
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TitanSTI
NorCal Classifieds
30
03-21-2007 12:35 PM
TitanSTI
NorCal Classifieds
34
10-08-2006 12:49 AM