Engine/Power - EJ25T (STI and 2006+ WRX) Discussions about the USDM 2006+ WRX and WRX STi 2.5 liter turbo flat-four.

K&N air filters are NOT A BENEFICIAL MOD!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2006, 03:47 PM
  #31  
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
NW OBS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Baja Oregon
Posts: 1,900
Car Info: '05 Impreza Outback Sport ~ "WTF! Two-Toned?"
Red face

Originally Posted by testes1010
The stock air box IS a CAI.

My reasoning for why a CAI > SRI is because the IAT(Inlet Air Temp Sensor) in the MAF is one of the factors for adjusting/advancing timing. Colder air more timing. (Although its a ****-poor location for it, it should be in the Throttle body after the IC or have 2 for calculating turbo/ic efficiency.)

Note: No aftermarket CAI or SRI is good for a stock WRX.



First off I did read the whole acticle. This one chart (attached), at least how I read it, conterdicts what you say about the K&N flow being the worst.

I read this as Restriction, In. of H20 across the filter(Actual pressure drop across the filter) as CFM increases. This chart alone shows that the K&N flows the best. I may have misinterpreted it but thats how I read it.

Jeremy
You got it right. Best flow = Not the best filtration.

Makes sense, everything is a trade off.

I got sick of the debate and bought an HKS three layer foam drop in ~ at least there is no oil...

Oh, and after running a Green an STI (SPT Version) and a K&N... the HKS was the only one I could feel ANY difference with. Better throttle response and easier revving high in the range (above 4 grand) then the others. This was with my mechanic riding and driving the car with each filter as a second opinion.
NW OBS is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 11:44 AM
  #32  
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
TheScoobyMedic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 612
Car Info: 05 wrx
im happy with my STi filter, personally i think its better than my stupid airhog and it filters better too... i think im gonna buy the HKS just to test it out to see if i like it..its only like $35

atleast the good thing with air filters are that its really easy to switch out and make runs with different ones
TheScoobyMedic is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 11:24 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
WRX409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 1,069
Car Info: 04 WRX
So, the K/N air filters will flow more CFM's but, doesn't filter
the elements like dirt as good?
WRX409 is offline  
Old 08-02-2006, 11:34 PM
  #34  
VIP Member
 
testes1010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 297
Car Info: 2003 Subaru WRX Aspen White
Originally Posted by WRX409
So, the K/N air filters will flow more CFM's but, doesn't filter
the elements like dirt as good?
yup..
testes1010 is offline  
Old 08-03-2006, 12:05 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
WRX409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Allentown,PA
Posts: 1,069
Car Info: 04 WRX
Originally Posted by testes1010
yup..
Thanks, well that is good to know.That explains why my K/N air filter
was caked with dust and dirt.
WRX409 is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 02:24 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
bl0wnb0xerbabiE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Antioch
Posts: 65
Car Info: 2006 wrx
I put on a K&N filter on my car and loved it. I swear I felt a performance increase. Car is louder, turbo whine I can actually hear now and bov is louder.Upshifts I felt less lag too.
bl0wnb0xerbabiE is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 09:38 PM
  #37  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
mhl23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Leandro or Emeryville
Posts: 367
Car Info: 02 aspen white WRX
what about the SPT?
it's from Subaru, it should be good, right?
mhl23 is offline  
Old 08-08-2006, 11:35 PM
  #38  
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
TheScoobyMedic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 612
Car Info: 05 wrx
yeah, its not oiled, however i believe it still leans out the air/fuel ratio, so youd have to get a custom tune

drop ins are the way to go, and i say stick with the STi filter element
TheScoobyMedic is offline  
Old 08-23-2006, 06:18 AM
  #39  
VIP Member
 
ride5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 12.9 / 105+
Posts: 488
Car Info: black my03 5mt wrx s/w
remember ALL filters actually filter BETTER (ie trap smaller diameter particulate matter) as they age.

i have run a k+n on my car since the month after i bought it. i resist the urge to overclean it, due to the above point. as a result i clean it once a year.

a good friend of mine picked up 1mph in a 1320 by removing an oem wrx air filter element entirely from the box. i have no corresponding data for any other filter though.
ride5000 is offline  
Old 08-23-2006, 07:52 AM
  #40  
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
SirWilliam05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Wild Serengeti Suburbs of MAIC
Posts: 147
Car Info: '08 WRB SG model D
Originally Posted by Cody8675309
The quote that really took me by surprise was this:

"Compared to the AC, the K&N “plugged up” nearly 3 times faster, passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
Hmm, this doesn't make any sense to me...maybe I am just tired. How can it pass 18 times more dirt but capture 37% less dirt? Wouldn't it be "...it passed 37% more dirt" which in turn means it captured 37% less dirt?
SirWilliam05 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
suba-rulez
Engine/Power - EJ25T (STI and 2006+ WRX)
2
07-16-2006 04:35 PM
symon
NorCal Classifieds
7
10-30-2004 11:35 AM
EnderW
Engine Management
1
04-22-2003 08:07 PM
marcus
Car Lounge
2
11-30-2002 06:04 PM



Quick Reply: K&N air filters are NOT A BENEFICIAL MOD!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:32 AM.