Dynoflash with FP HTA3586R on '05 STI
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
From: McKinney, Texas
Car Info: EVO IX
Dynoflash with FP HTA3586R on '05 STI
Not sure how many of you guys have seen Al from Dynoflash and his STi check it out http://forums.evolutionm.net/showthread.php?t=377950
VIP Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,023
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car Info: Subaru Impreza WRX 2002
Not sure how many of you guys have seen Al from Dynoflash and his STi check it out http://forums.evolutionm.net/showthread.php?t=377950
VIP Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,023
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car Info: Subaru Impreza WRX 2002
Oh, I know that. The issue at that PSI isn't rods or cylinder walls, it is the head gasket. The boxer motor configuration makes for an unusually large surface area for the head and crankshaft/cam gaskets; you can blow them with stock PSI (and with the EJ25 Legacy block, with NO added PSI). It is absolutely awesome to have that kind of power out of the EJ25, killer job on that -- but driving it more than 1/4 mile at a time -- yow! :-)
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Bah... I was running 30psi on a bone stock block and the head gasket held just fine 
BTW, if you read the entire thread linked from here, there are some large discrepancies between the "comparison" and Al won't confirm or deny that he was running more boost with the HTA turbo. Take all this with a grain of salt.
Thanks
BTW, if you read the entire thread linked from here, there are some large discrepancies between the "comparison" and Al won't confirm or deny that he was running more boost with the HTA turbo. Take all this with a grain of salt.
Thanks
Bah... I was running 30psi on a bone stock block and the head gasket held just fine
BTW, if you read the entire thread linked from here, there are some large discrepancies between the "comparison" and Al won't confirm or deny that he was running more boost with the HTA turbo. Take all this with a grain of salt.
Thanks
BTW, if you read the entire thread linked from here, there are some large discrepancies between the "comparison" and Al won't confirm or deny that he was running more boost with the HTA turbo. Take all this with a grain of salt.
Thanks
i think
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,494
From: Participating in some Anarchy!
Car Info: 2005 LGT wagon
Oh, I know that. The issue at that PSI isn't rods or cylinder walls, it is the head gasket. The boxer motor configuration makes for an unusually large surface area for the head and crankshaft/cam gaskets; you can blow them with stock PSI (and with the EJ25 Legacy block, with NO added PSI). It is absolutely awesome to have that kind of power out of the EJ25, killer job on that -- but driving it more than 1/4 mile at a time -- yow! :-)
I do not know what a crankshaft/cam gasket is.
VIP Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,023
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car Info: Subaru Impreza WRX 2002
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thunder_sti
Hawaii
0
Aug 26, 2006 11:00 PM
