Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM) There is replacement for displacement, it is forced induction - OEM 2.0 liter turbo engines in the USDM WRX. 90-94 Legacy Turbo EJ22 turbo engines can also be discussed here.

Variable Valve Timing in US

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2002 | 09:07 PM
  #19  
stealth-wrx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 673
From: Lake Forest, Calfornia
Car Info: 2004+ Two Tone Green
if link comes out with it within the next three months i will have to put some sti heads on my car.
Old Nov 25, 2002 | 06:23 AM
  #21  
DeliciouSpeed's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 692
From: Somewhere in the Eastbay
Theres no reason why an after market system could not run avcs. Just because no ones done it yet. Many ECUs have the required hardware.

k2
Old Nov 26, 2002 | 01:47 PM
  #23  
DeliciouSpeed's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 692
From: Somewhere in the Eastbay
The only vtec plant with variable intake runners is the GSR. And that manifold transition is seperate of the vtec funtion. Plus that's a crappy manifold. I becomes a big compromise when trying to make big hp na.

k2
Old Nov 26, 2002 | 03:17 PM
  #25  
Sloppy Joe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 75
From: New England
I have a Ver. 7 motor and I am waiting for the new Autronic ECU that Shiv is soon to be releasing, which he had told me will have the ability to control AVCS function. But unfortunately the word soon + Shiv = long long wait.... He said previously the release date would be in the fall but I'm hoping for at least around January..
Tom
Old Nov 26, 2002 | 11:47 PM
  #28  
Steppin Razor's Avatar
@Stoptech
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,416
From: San Francisco, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
I can imagine this variable timing was not included on our motor for a couple of reasons. Cost is certainly one of them, but there are other factors. I would have hoped Subaru would have used variable valve timing to help achieve emissions and mileage goals, but motors tend generally to detonate in the 3000-4000 rpm region where the cylinder pressures are highest and variable valve timing does no really help this problem. It is very tricky to produce highest possible torque at low rpm with our 91/93 octane. This fact is perhaps overshadowed by the EPA nitrous oxide output limits at full throttle and the need to keep the car out of low rpm boost so that it can run the EPA mileage cycle with minimum fuel consumption. These regulations are an ugly fact of life for US specification engine designers these days. Subaru engineers reasoned, and In all honesty, what was there to gain by adding expensive technical wizardry if it cannot be exploited on 91/93 octane gas available world wide? (For the record, the European 95 RON standard is roughly 92-93 US octane these days, although they also have a "97" octane super)

Flagrantly plagiarized from SPD Tuning.
There is a wealth of information at that site. Whether or not you subscribe to Mike's tuning (commonly known as tunning or even tonning) philosophy is another story. Not many people do.

Last edited by Steppin Razor; Nov 26, 2002 at 11:52 PM.
Old Nov 29, 2002 | 11:59 AM
  #30  
100's Avatar
100
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 38
From: Oakland
Car Info: Blue WRX Wagon, Stage II ish, 260 whp
I'm sure you can get more power with VVT.

The Subaru STi literature states that the valve timing is set to allow a "scavenging effect" at higher rpms. That means that both the intake and exhaust valves are open at the same time.

I doubt that you could idle with the same overlap. So you can't get this overlap without VVT. So VVT gives you more power.

100

OUT



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:02 AM.