Who's using the California Map for Cobb AP's?
I'm running the ca. stage 2 map and don't have any complaints so far, if you're paranoid just get a pro tune with the gas you plan on running.
it's about 1.1 bar onrthe stock boost guage.
it's about 1.1 bar onrthe stock boost guage.
I just installed the 91 octane stage 2 of the shelf map and had Mike @ Gruppe-S do a Protune and he suggested to just put the stock airbox back to bump up the torque. My car ran 273.9 awhp @ 6000rpm & 274.7 Torque @ 4000rpm consistently. He said if that if I put the stock airbox back it should jump to 285 torque! Mike was telling me that Cobb has been asking for input on their off the shelf maps that come with the access port and that they are so good now that you dont even have to Protune it unless you make a major upgrade like a new turbo or front mount intercooler. I was running a Injen cold air intake and it was making my car run a little lean and it was reducing my torque. He didnt even Protune the car cuz it was running so well with the off the shelf map. Also keep in mind that my car was tested on a Mustang Dyno which reads the lowest out of all dyno's out there. So yea, my car is running the 91 octane stage 2 California map.
Originally Posted by zeroGsti
I just installed the 91 octane stage 2 of the shelf map and had Mike @ Gruppe-S do a Protune and he suggested to just put the stock airbox back to bump up the torque. My car ran 273.9 awhp @ 6000rpm & 274.7 Torque @ 4000rpm consistently. He said if that if I put the stock airbox back it should jump to 285 torque! Mike was telling me that Cobb has been asking for input on their off the shelf maps that come with the access port and that they are so good now that you dont even have to Protune it unless you make a major upgrade like a new turbo or front mount intercooler. I was running a Injen cold air intake and it was making my car run a little lean and it was reducing my torque. He didnt even Protune the car cuz it was running so well with the off the shelf map. Also keep in mind that my car was tested on a Mustang Dyno which reads the lowest out of all dyno's out there. So yea, my car is running the 91 octane stage 2 California map.
wOW.... You are putting down 273 whp on a stage 2? That crazy? Cobb estimate 273 for a vf34 turbo upgrade with all other stage 2 mods???
Im guessing ZeroGsti has an STI... not a WRX... which means he already has the VF39... hence his numbers are exactly where they need to be except for the Torque... hes missing out a good chunk there because of the CAI... the stock airbox would yield him better torque and overall safer/richer conditions
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 107
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2004 WRX Wagon PSM
Originally Posted by projectwrx
ive heard that running the cali maps still creates a lean issue. heard this straight from the horses mouth yo!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carletto
Engine Management
0
Jul 23, 2005 03:20 PM
Slack
Engine/Power - EJ20T (pre-2006 WRX and JDM)
12
Aug 27, 2004 12:21 PM




