Car Lounge General automotive talk not specific to Subaru.

C6 Z06 pixs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 02:01 AM
  #1  
luckistryke's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 291
From: Omega Werks Pleasanton, CA
Car Info: '00 S2K, '10 Ducati 1098 Streetfighter
C6 Z06 pixs

the new hottnesss
http://vorlon.case.edu/~aap8/gallery...st_2.sized.jpg


more here,
http://vorlon.case.edu/~aap8/gallery/c6z06spy/
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 02:04 AM
  #2  
slagehammer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,413
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car Info: Twin WRX Turbo VR-4
this one .... I like. great pictures there
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 08:32 AM
  #3  
blue blurr's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,312
From: Why the **** is
Car Info: this required information?
have you seen the specs on this thing? its supercar specs but for only 75ishK
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 10:49 AM
  #4  
zumnwrx's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,155
From: Alaska
Car Info: R.I.P 03 aspen white wrx
dont you just love all the new hood scoops poping up...

biteRz
edgar,
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 10:51 AM
  #5  
HomerJay's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,706
From: Santa Rosa
Car Info: MY00RS25
The regular vette has cleaner better lines. The rear vent for the brakes really throws off the looks. Also, the engines is 2 litres bigger than the stock but the performance is not that much better. I can't understand why they don't switch to a OHC and run a smaller lighter engine or boost.
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 11:52 AM
  #6  
blue blurr's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,312
From: Why the **** is
Car Info: this required information?
2liters? the stock is 5.7 and the z06 is like 6.1 isnt it? something like that im not a vette person. it has a 100 more which is a pretty big jump
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 12:14 PM
  #7  
Salty's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,675
From: Wherever Sucks the Most
Car Info: 2003 WRX, 2008 Camry
It's like the poor man's lobster that's still damn tasty.
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #8  
KurleeDaddeeWRX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,959
From: Gilroy, CA
Car Info: 2017 WRB WRX Premium
Originally Posted by blue blurr
2liters? the stock is 5.7 and the z06 is like 6.1 isnt it? something like that im not a vette person. it has a 100 more which is a pretty big jump
NO. The regular C6 is now a 6.0 liter and the Z06 may come with a 7.0 liter 427ci motor just like they did starting in 1967.

Kurlee Daddee
(THE ORIGINAL)
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 04:37 PM
  #9  
PlatNmRex's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,020
From: Oakdale/Modesto
Car Info: '02 WRX E85 VF34
I love the fact that's its based on aluminum as to save 100 pounds, just rediculous
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 04:44 PM
  #10  
Cyrus923's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (-2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 829
From: Knoxville, Tennessee
Car Info: 2004 WRX in WR Blue
Even though it wont hold the same quality or be as rare as most of the supercars out there, it sure is a great machine for 75k. Carrera GT, saleen, viper...all got owned in the straight line catagory.
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 08:27 PM
  #11  
SsTiNgEr77's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,243
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: 2002
how can u guys knock on this car... its ****in godly and makes subaru look like KIA
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #12  
bassplayrr's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,709
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car Info: CRZ EX-Navi/6MT & Vue Redline
Originally Posted by HomerJay
The regular vette has cleaner better lines. The rear vent for the brakes really throws off the looks. Also, the engines is 2 litres bigger than the stock but the performance is not that much better. I can't understand why they don't switch to a OHC and run a smaller lighter engine or boost.

Do some research. OHV engines are very small in OUTSIDE displacement due to their more simple design. For example, the modular 4.6 motor in the newer Mustang is actually larger in outside dimensions than the old 428 Cobra Jet of the 60's. Why should the Vett move to a lower displacement motor when its current unit is no larger than the porsche turbo motor, is lighter, is more simple and reliable, gets better fuel mileage, and produces more horsepower? Bash old tech OHV motors like the unit in the Viper, but the new LS2 and LS7 motors are Jewels.

-Chris

oh... and it's only a liter larger in displacement than the LS2. The old LS1 was 5.6, the LS2 is 6.0 and the LS7 is 7.0

Last edited by bassplayrr; Jan 8, 2005 at 09:11 PM.
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #13  
bassplayrr's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,709
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car Info: CRZ EX-Navi/6MT & Vue Redline
Here's a GREAT article about the benefits of pushrod motors written in Car and Driver. It has a nice comparison between the previous generation Z06's LS6 motor and the Twin Turbo V8 in the Cayanne.

http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=1

-Chris
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #14  
hatchy's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 486
From: North West
Car Info: 2004 USDM STI
What is the weight difference between the LS7 and the porsche turbo motor (I assume you mean the 996TT and not the SUV)?

Originally Posted by bassplayrr
Why should the Vett move to a lower displacement motor when its current unit is no larger than the porsche turbo motor, is lighter, is more simple and reliable, gets better fuel mileage, and produces more horsepower? Bash old tech OHV motors like the unit in the Viper, but the new LS2 and LS7 motors are Jewels.

-Chris

oh... and it's only a liter larger in displacement than the LS2. The old LS1 was 5.6, the LS2 is 6.0 and the LS7 is 7.0
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 09:23 PM
  #15  
bassplayrr's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,709
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car Info: CRZ EX-Navi/6MT & Vue Redline
Originally Posted by hatchy
What is the weight difference between the LS7 and the porsche turbo motor (I assume you mean the 996TT and not the SUV)?

I don't know about the LS7. I was referring to the LS6 and the 996TT, and I don't know that off the top of my head either. I'm trying to find where I originally read that (one of the car mags) and I'll post the link when I do. If I remember correctly the compero was an LS6 with necessary components and the 996TT motor with necessary components + turbos, uppipes, and intercoolers. The LS7 should be damn near the same wight if not less since boring the cylinders does not add any weight and much of the added weight from the reinforced components will be offset by the use of more titanium and alluminum alloys in the LS7.

-Chris

Last edited by bassplayrr; Jan 8, 2005 at 09:33 PM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:48 AM.