Any Former Honda Owners???
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,402
From: Bay Area
Car Info: 02 WRX wagon=dead; rollin' in a Craptastic Camry!
Originally Posted by projectwrx
you had a civic... theres no comparison to a wrx.
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,029
From: Sacramento CA
Car Info: 02 Impreza WRX sedan
You're right - this thread has been 'jacked, but check the member Profile of the person who posted the top post - hasn't logged back in since posting that single post on that screenname back in mid-February. 
--
0==WW==0
"…axles of evil…" - george w. bush

--
0==WW==0
"…axles of evil…" - george w. bush
Originally Posted by atlas
i went ftom owning a 1993 civic that I turbo'd to a 2003 Acura RSX Type-S. after that I switched to the Evo and now I'm looking at a WRX Wagon.
I love Honda's. always have, always will. But I will never try to make a honda fast ever again. They are fun project cars, but that's about it. It really doesn't matter to me what kinda of car you drive, as long as it's Japanese ^_^
Honda cars are great, just not great at making power. My 2 cents.
I love Honda's. always have, always will. But I will never try to make a honda fast ever again. They are fun project cars, but that's about it. It really doesn't matter to me what kinda of car you drive, as long as it's Japanese ^_^
Honda cars are great, just not great at making power. My 2 cents.
Originally Posted by Wingless Wonder
You're right - this thread has been 'jacked, but check the member Profile of the person who posted the top post - hasn't logged back in since posting that single post on that screenname back in mid-February. 

the honda vs. subaru question.
the new Civic Si looks to be an appealing option though.
my 2 cents , I bought my subi 3 months ago and sold my 99 integra last month. My opinion on this topic is honda is tops in my book , I made 450 whp with my GSR and the only draw back was low torque #'s and poor handeling at high speed in the twisties. In my opinion my STI takes over where my integra left off.
I have a 00 civic Si, 98 prelude, and an 06 STi. I would have got another honda but they didn't have anything even close to the STi. You might want to take a look at the back seat of an Impreza, they have four doors but the rear seat is pretty small.
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 198
From: Bay Area, CA
Car Info: 2002 WRX Wagon
I used to own a 95 accord. Had damn near everything i wanted done to it besides fixing the cracked and ripped open sunburnt leather interior. SiR F20, Tein coilovers and bigger swaybars along with some strut braces. My whole goal was to have a somewhat quick car that handled great. The engine I could have done without 'cause the power still wasn't there and I wasn't about to spent another 3 g's for a damn turbo to a car that wasn't meant for speed. The handling was greatly improved though. Then I test drove my 02 dub. I told the guy to polish it and I'd be back for it in the morning. Though I've done some suspension mods and a turbo back, the car gratly outperformed my old accord. Don't get me wrong, there are some very fast hondas and i've driven a couple that have scared the ba-jesus outta me. But those were all toys(NOT RELIABLE). Seriously, the AWD and turbo'd engine of just a stock dub bringsmeaning back to the word FUN. Oh yeah, and the boxer engine sounds f'in sickkkk!!!! Sorry, this was a little long and really went nowhere.
Last edited by C 007; Nov 26, 2006 at 01:46 AM. Reason: needed to add words.
I had a 2000 Civic Si and it was a great car. A lot of things about it were better than my 2004 WRX but not many of them are performance related. Fit and finish, build quality, and powertrain feel were all better. That being said, the WRX is in a different league in terms of performance numbers and features than the new Civic Si.
Have you driven both? The 'vettes only beat it in a straight line and the fit and finish on them is horrendous in comparison. Granted, the newer vettes are a huge improvement over the C5 but the NSX is a pretty sweet ride. Besides, you're comparing Honda's 15 year old product to GM's product that came out two years ago. Compare the C6 Z06 to the V10 ~500 HP NSX revision in a couple years
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
Same here. Even the NSX is an underachiever, especially at $90,000. A standard Corvette (C5 or C6) will whip its *** for half the price; literally.
Last edited by woody06967; Nov 27, 2006 at 11:18 AM.
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,522
From: Salinas, CA
Car Info: 1997 Acura Integra GS Sedan
Originally Posted by woody06967
Have you driven both? The 'vettes only beat it in a straight line and the fit and finish on them is horrendous in comparison. Granted, the newer vettes are a huge improvement over the C5 but the NSX is a pretty sweet ride. Besides, you're comparing Honda's 15 year old product to GM's product that came out two years ago. Compare the C6 Z06 to the V10 ~500 HP NSX revision in a couple years 

Originally Posted by SubyN00by
sinister is now going to complain that you are an idiot and say that you are falling into the trap that honda wants you to think in, that chevy's the best car maker ever, the camaro iroc-z can spin circles around anything, and that your mother is going to die by his hand...or something of that nature.
I used to have an Accord. The fit/finish, impeccable drivetrain smoothness and durability were amazing. When I traded it in for the Impreza it had over 300,000 miles on it and still ran great. Everything else on the car had simply aged to the point of no return, but the motor still purred like a kitten. However, the Subaru is reliable enough for me not to complain about it, and you just can't beat the handling and AWD...
I love my Impreza, but if Honda offered a 2.0L (or bigger), with turbo, AWD, mid-sized sedan, for less than 25k, I'd be all over it in a heartbeat.
I love my Impreza, but if Honda offered a 2.0L (or bigger), with turbo, AWD, mid-sized sedan, for less than 25k, I'd be all over it in a heartbeat.


