What Dynos/tuning give your the best accurate whp #'s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2010, 11:52 PM
  #61  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
dimsumboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: H-town
Posts: 304
Car Info: 2000 AW 2.5RS, 2013 Cadillac Escalade
Originally Posted by stupidchicken03
LMFAO! funny looking fella. Oopsss, I totally didn't read the title correctly.
dimsumboi is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 02:07 AM
  #62  
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
G_Ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Campbell, CA
Posts: 7,634
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
Originally Posted by dimsumboi
Why take your car on weak and scrubby (brake, rolling, jet, mustang) dynos that don't tell you JACK? When you can get the most accurate reading from these? : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coXB3xd6VK8
I know its the best way to know your HP because I take my cars to get their power checked from one of these as well..
Knowing what the engine makes is nice an all, but I think CaliSuby would be more interested in how much power is going through the wheels. There's such a thing known as drivetrain loss.
G_Ride is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 02:10 AM
  #63  
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
 
brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: www.gunatics.com
Posts: 19,930
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
Originally Posted by SeaOfGreen
Anyways I'm not here to fight
Ok, so what you said to lowend about meeting his "tiny 125lb *** any time" meant that you wanted to meet him for coffee? Give me a break.


Welcome to i-club, we're NOT NAZIOK (NASIOC) where everything goes, we're a close knit group of people and the LAST thing we do is threaten each other... So when a newbie such as yourself comes here and starts picking fights with old school contributing members it doesn't sit well with the rest of us.
brucelee is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 02:55 AM
  #64  
Registered User
 
SeaOfGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 972
Car Info: 2004 WW Evo RS
Yes I'm not here to fight, that don't mean I won't. Anyways I understand after talking to stupidchicken03, my bad for callin someone a "tool". Just gets me steaming when people post false info! I will just keep my mouth shut, my mouth seems to get me in trouble often!
SeaOfGreen is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 04:30 AM
  #65  
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
 
brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: www.gunatics.com
Posts: 19,930
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
Cool

Originally Posted by SeaOfGreen
Yes I'm not here to fight, that don't mean I won't.


See, this is EXACTLY what I'm talking about. Seriously asking this, how old are you? Why do you feel the need to fight people? Especially people who post garbage on the web? Why do you even care what people write on the internet?

The web is just that, it's a virtual world where everyone can hide behind their computers and talk a bunch of crap, and with that being said, you will see everyone and their mother talking up a storm about how tuff they are, how much they know about a subject, and how much greater their car is than the other person. This is why NO ONE should take the internet seriously... Someone's internet persona is NOT their real life persona, and for someone to get really offended by something that is said online really shows how insecure that person is with themselves... Like they have something to prove to others.

The only reason ANYONE should EVER fight is to defend themselves against bodily harm, otherwise there is NO REASON to take it to a physical level... The only people who use physical violence and start fights are the people who don't know how to deal with situations on an intellectual/logical manner. I, as well as any NORMAL person past the age of 23-24 frown upon people who resort to physical violence to solve their problems. It's the stupid way to deal with ANY situation and fighting should only be reserved to the extreme situations where you have to defend yourself against someone who is attacking you. If a person has to resort to physical violence to solve a problem they are both immature and probably have a low IQ.

If you're (not referring to you in particular) resorting to physical violence because someone "offended" you, or whatever the case might be, it's obvious that you lack the mental capability to reason with the situation, and in some cases shows that there might be a chemical imbalance with the said person (like severe cases of being bi-polar, schizophrenia, etc)


In short, my point is that people who resort to fighting others as a way to solve arguments/problems either lack the mental capability to reason with a situation and use their wits to get out of the altercation, OR the person is "simple" or has a mental condition that they can't control which leads them to the physical violence (the most primitive way of dealing with a problem BTW). There's also the "roid rage" type of people who feel the need to prove something to everyone about how strong they are, usually this stems back to a childhood insecurity (maybe Daddy didn't pay enough attention?).


Sorry for the long post, but you keep digging yourself into a deeper hole by mentioning how you're down to fight if you need to. No one here wants to fight... Hell, anyone past the age of 17 doesn't want to fight anyone. Put yourself above that.
brucelee is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 04:38 AM
  #66  
Friendly Neighborhood Ogre
iTrader: (6)
 
brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: www.gunatics.com
Posts: 19,930
Car Info: GUNATICS.COM
BTW, you know how you mentioned how you hate when people post incorrect info and how it "steams" you?


Perhaps you should look in to the definition of the words: "There", "Their", and "They're", because you've used "There" in the wrong context in every single post that contains the word.


For example, you say: "There dyno is really nice!"
It should be: "Their dyno is really nice"

Seriously, we learned this in the 3rd grade. Go to www.google.com and look up "Their there and they're", find the differences between each word and THEN post up, because some of us get "steamed" when we see incorrect info being posted.


I'm just sayin'...
brucelee is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 06:51 AM
  #67  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
RLLYRCR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 2,164
Car Info: 1988 Yoda
lol
RLLYRCR is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 10:32 AM
  #68  
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
EQ Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Posts: 8,228
Car Info: A Laptop
is there even 1 full page of useful info in this 5 page thread??

-- Ed
EQ Tuning is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 11:13 AM
  #69  
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
bwaynep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Downtown San Jose, CA
Posts: 519
Car Info: 2002 Subaru WRX Sedan
Originally Posted by SeaOfGreen
Lowend=tool
Name:  threadwrecker.gif
Views: 15
Size:  416.2 KB

bwaynep is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 11:16 AM
  #70  
Registered User
 
SeaOfGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 972
Car Info: 2004 WW Evo RS
Brucepee calm down, I never said I was a master speller. Anyways Bruce if you got a problem just send me a PM. Anyways I was trying to drop it and you just keep pushing. Like Ed said nothing but crap on this thread, I'm done with you Bruce, I said I was wrong what else you want, a hug?, blow*ob!
SeaOfGreen is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 11:20 AM
  #71  
more than meets the eye
iTrader: (14)
 
soundwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 6,054
Car Info: ?
Originally Posted by SeaOfGreen
I'm done with you Bruce, I said I was wrong what else you want a blow*ob!
soundwave is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 03:24 PM
  #72  
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Lowend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 4,300
Car Info: http://kiva.org/invitedby/brett4254
There's a difference between posting False, and possabably dated information.
Lowend is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 03:49 PM
  #73  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
xdeathwishx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 649
Car Info: 2002 Black Subaru WRX Sedan Stage 2
Everyone knows the butt dyno is the most accurate.
xdeathwishx is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 03:52 PM
  #74  
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
xdeathwishx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 649
Car Info: 2002 Black Subaru WRX Sedan Stage 2
Originally Posted by SeaOfGreen
Anyways Bruce if you got a problem just send me a PM.
SOG (do you mind if I call you SOG?), maybe you should follow this advice.
xdeathwishx is offline  
Old 11-08-2010, 04:54 PM
  #75  
Yeah, You've Probably Never Heard Of Me.
iTrader: (21)
 
Krinkov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: in a glass case of emotion.
Posts: 17,962
Car Info: 345/30/19s
Originally Posted by SeaOfGreen
Brucepee calm down, I never said I was a master speller. Anyways Bruce if you got a problem just send me a PM. Anyways I was trying to drop it and you just keep pushing. Like Ed said nothing but crap on this thread, I'm done with you Bruce, I said I was wrong what else you want, a hug?, blow*ob!
this,

This s*** is over now.

Group hug!!

Krinkov is offline  


Quick Reply: What Dynos/tuning give your the best accurate whp #'s?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Top

© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands



When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.