What Dynos/tuning give your the best accurate whp #'s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 08:29 AM
  #16  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by Lowend
The Mustang Dyno is most certainly NOT the most accurate.
Roller dyno's have inherent inaccuracy built into their design.
A roller dyno requires the that car be run over a range of RPM's. You know the mass of the roller, and the amount of energy it takes to accelerate it over a certain amount of time. Through a series of equations you can convert this into an estimate of horsepower.
The reason why you see these beautiful arc shaped torque curves... they are estimates.


The Dynapack hub bolt dyno is the best one I've found.
It uses a magnet based braking system to actually measure torque.
As a side benefit this allows you to hold an engine at a given RPM and make changes to the tune under specific circumstance (load,etc.)

All of that said... a standard roller dyno can still be an excellent tool for tuning.
BUT - you asked for the best.
Actually most modern roller dynos such as mustang, dyno dynics, dynocom, dynomite, superflow, etc are loading type dynos which use magnetic eddy brakes to apply load to the rollers and control their acceleration. This allows the dyno to better replicate a real world load curve as well as allow for thing like steady state tuning by holding the dyno at a certain speed/rpm.

I would actually argue that dynapaks are less effective real world tuning tools because you are doing the runs without the wheels. This impacts both the numbers and the way the engine is loaded up. Furthermore, the dynapaks as well as the dyno dynamics dynos only allow a linear acceleration curve when doing a pull. This is very unrealistic and means that the tuner will have to do more fine tuning on the road to adjust for the real world load and acceleration curves. Other dynos like the mustang and dynocom allow the tuner to simulate an actualu real world load curve which better emulates what the car will see on the road.

Thanks
-- Ed
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 08:57 AM
  #17  
SeaOfGreen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 972
From: Sonoma County
Car Info: 2004 WW Evo RS
Lowend=tool
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 09:10 AM
  #18  
Irrational X's Avatar
plays well with others
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,923
From: Sac
Car Info: your mother crazy
Originally Posted by soundwave
"inflated" dyno numbers dont mean crap. the only thing that should matter is the delta from your baseline vs tuned dyno .
this
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 09:20 AM
  #19  
Lowend's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,301
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: http://kiva.org/invitedby/brett4254
I'll admit my dyno research is dated; it's very possible that the roller dynos have stepped up their game.

SeaOfGreen - perhaps you could provide a little knowledge before you start calling names.
Sorry if I'm not impressed by your 30 posts.
E-Thug
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 09:49 AM
  #20  
wombatsauce's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,441
From: Stockholm
Car Info: 2018 Golf R Variant
Strange question... A Dyno is a tuning tool, not a benchracing tool. The best answer really would be: "the same dyno and tuner you used last time." I think that's just my opinion though.. Doesn't make much sense to measure your output using one TYPE of dyno and then on another let alone dynos that are set up different. You use the same dyno to see where you are vs. where you were (that delta thingy) so switching dynos would not make sense.
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 09:53 AM
  #21  
SeaOfGreen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 972
From: Sonoma County
Car Info: 2004 WW Evo RS
LOWEND I don't post about things I don't know much about, unlike you who thinks they know what there talking about! You even drive a Subaru? E thug? Lol I will meet your little 125pound *** any time son!

Last edited by SeaOfGreen; Nov 6, 2010 at 09:56 AM.
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 09:59 AM
  #22  
FXTbrah's Avatar
previously known as wrxBRAH
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,383
From: San Jose / Campbell
Car Info: 2004 FXT
Originally Posted by Lowend
I'll admit my dyno research is dated; it's very possible that the roller dynos have stepped up their game.

SeaOfGreen - perhaps you could provide a little knowledge before you start calling names.
Sorry if I'm not impressed by your 30 posts.
E-Thug
Originally Posted by SeaOfGreen
LOWEND I don't post about things I don't know much about, unlike you who thinks they know what there talking about! You even drive a Subaru? E thug? Lol I will meet your little 125pound *** any time son!
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #23  
Gibz's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,983
From: Los Altos
Car Info: '11 White Shelby Cobra GT 500
Boys boys boys! Chill out lol
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 10:04 AM
  #24  
Lowend's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,301
From: San Jose, CA
Car Info: http://kiva.org/invitedby/brett4254
thank you for proving my point...

Unless we want to continue talking about the differences in dynos, I am no longer interested in this conversation
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 10:11 AM
  #25  
akdmx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,161
From: Bay Area/SB
Car Info: 02 WRX
Has anyone here compared their Accessport Dyno numbers to actual dyno numbers?

I'm curious to know how well that thing does.
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 10:42 AM
  #26  
SeaOfGreen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 972
From: Sonoma County
Car Info: 2004 WW Evo RS
LOWEND that's what I thought! Next time don't run your little trap you E-Nerd. When your car hits a dyno let know, then we can talk dyno's!
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 10:59 AM
  #27  
snowflow's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,499
From: L.A. and the mountains
Car Info: WRX
Yo son!

lol
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 11:03 AM
  #28  
Nick Koan's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,466
From: The BLC
Car Info: Legacy GT
Which ever one is calibrated properly.
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 11:52 AM
  #29  
VRT MBasile's Avatar
VIP Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 22,776
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Car Info: '13 BRZ Limited / '02 WRX
Dyno's (as you know) are all calibrated differently. Therefore, if you want to compare HP?TQ numbers, both cars need to be tested on the same dyno and under the same conditions. If you really want to compare things though, go to the track and compare drivers. The cars are the tools with the potential for speed, its the drivers (sometimes also tools) that make a car faster (to a certain degree).

Basically though, dyno numbers are not an exact measurement, but rather a reference point.
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 12:05 PM
  #30  
EQ Tuning's Avatar
iClub Silver Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,228
From: 631 Railroad Ave. Fairfield, CA
Car Info: A Laptop
Originally Posted by VRT MBasile
The cars are the tools with the potential for speed, its the drivers (sometimes also tools) that make a car faster

!

-- Ed



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:16 PM.


Top

© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands



When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.