Tire size vs. gas mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #1  
DLUX WRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,531
From: Bike Lane
Car Info: Black 2003 WRX Sedan
Tire size vs. gas mileage?

I wanted to know if anyone had info on what gets you better gas mileage. Narrower, smaller less sticky tires or larger diameter tires? I took off my wheels that had 235/45-17 S0-3's and put the stockers back on (205/55-16). Am i going to notice better gas mileage or will be about the same assuming that my driving habits stay the same. Anyone try this?
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 01:50 PM
  #2  
ish's Avatar
ish
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,016
From: Oakland, CA
Car Info: 2009 wrx & 2000 4runner
yes you will get better gas mileage

narrower tires give you better gas mileage as they provide less friction/resistance to the road.

less friction = less energy required = less gas used
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 02:00 PM
  #3  
Bass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 67
From: EPA, mofo!
Car Info: '05 STi
Originally Posted by ish
yes you will get better gas mileage

narrower tires give you better gas mileage as they provide less friction/resistance to the road.

less friction = less energy required = less gas used
I think it's coz of the smaller wheels/tires (less rotating inertia = less mass to get moving and slow down = less energy = less gas). Unless he's averaging 100MPH the extra tire width won't amount to much wind resistance.

Not sure the friction is an issue. The only dynamic friction (sliding tires, relative to the ground) is with turning and different slip angles.

I may be talking out of my ... what do I know
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #4  
ish's Avatar
ish
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,016
From: Oakland, CA
Car Info: 2009 wrx & 2000 4runner
the lower mass does play into it as well.

friction is always an issue.
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #5  
DLUX WRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,531
From: Bike Lane
Car Info: Black 2003 WRX Sedan
what about circumfrence? i believe the outer circumfrence of the stock tire is 78.2 inches and the S0-3's have a circumfrence of 79.6 inches?
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 04:05 PM
  #6  
Lorry's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 870
Lighter wheels - less angular momentum so you lose less energy when you accelerate/decelerate.

Narrower tyres - less rolling resistance at a constant speed.

Tyre pressure - keep your tyres pumped up. Low pressure allows the tyre to flex more which loses energy as heat in the tyre.


Whether you will notice the difference going 235 -> 205 is questionable. It might not make enough difference to worry about - let us know
Old Sep 16, 2005 | 04:18 PM
  #7  
DLUX WRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,531
From: Bike Lane
Car Info: Black 2003 WRX Sedan
i'll check my tank and the mileage over the next few weeks.
overall, im more concerned with the relation between tire width vs. tire circumfrence rather than wheel mass. if it was a case of acceleration i would consider the mass of the wheel a little more.
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #8  
Zoeb2s's Avatar
I <3 White Girls
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,491
From: Danville, CA
Car Info: E92 M3, E70, F32, E21
circumfrence does play a roll....small circumfrence = lower gearing. Lower gearing = lower gas milage

weight of the wheels and tires have an effect on it as well though

Old Sep 17, 2005 | 11:23 PM
  #9  
STi-owns-evo's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,670
From: East Bay / Pomona
Car Info: '02 PSM WRX
I think tires contribute such a little amount to gas mileage that the way you drive does so much more. When I put my S-03s (225/45/17) on vs my RE92s (or even when I have my PZero on a 225/50/16) so same size width tires, I always got less gas mileage on the stocker size just because I always wanted to push my S-03s harder on turns and such. Also, the S-03s are wrapped around SSR comps, so the wheels do weigh a lot less so mass isn't an issue either.
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 01:06 PM
  #10  
SnoHumper's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,792
From: San Jose
Car Info: sc300
you should definitly change ur driving habits going back to stock tires or you mind find yourself understeering
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #11  
motoracr22's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 516
From: Mukilteo, WA
Car Info: 96' Impreza GM4
Your stock 205/55/16's make 811.0 revolutions per mile. The 235/45/17 made 796.0 revs per mile. So yah, with your old tires, they were turning less...equaling a lower speed by 1.8%. So your mileage also register lower. If your odo registered 60 miles, you actually travelled 61.1 miles. So ya your gas mileage should be better by 1.8%, excluding friction/pressure...

^ I said that correctly right?

Originally Posted by DLUX WRX
what about circumfrence? i believe the outer circumfrence of the stock tire is 78.2 inches and the S0-3's have a circumfrence of 79.6 inches?
Exactly

Last edited by motoracr22; Sep 18, 2005 at 02:45 PM.
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 05:10 PM
  #12  
DLUX WRX's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,531
From: Bike Lane
Car Info: Black 2003 WRX Sedan
so what makes a bigger difference? tire diameter or friction?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Donnie_Doritos
NorCal Classifieds
3
Mar 30, 2008 10:57 AM
wu!
Car Lounge
23
May 23, 2006 04:28 PM
kidatari
Sacramento & Reno
4
Sep 9, 2004 12:22 AM
Shaitiger
For Sale by Members
3
Apr 2, 2003 12:09 AM
Shaitiger
For Sale by Members
4
Mar 30, 2003 11:22 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:01 AM.