For those who hates Gay (I mean Gray) Davis
Originally posted by Sisqocqk
I've only done Mary-jane once but i think now's the time to legalize marijuana. california would be out of the deficit within a year.
People are doing it regardless so why not tax the f**k out of it!? and lower the spending on drug control through the PD's.
eric.... oh and
davis... what a dumba$$.. tax something else if you have no choice. like really rich people
I've only done Mary-jane once but i think now's the time to legalize marijuana. california would be out of the deficit within a year.
People are doing it regardless so why not tax the f**k out of it!? and lower the spending on drug control through the PD's.
eric.... oh and
davis... what a dumba$$.. tax something else if you have no choice. like really rich people
good point but ultra conservative bush would say de-nay-no. look at canada, he tried to intervien with that.
and for those who want to get Davis thrown out, gimme a friggin break.
maybe all your friends should have voted. how about we cost our state even more money, that should solve everything. or how about we just so happen to elect the guy who is leading the whole "anti-davis campaign" and paying for it with his own money.sorry for the rant, but you gotta pay to play and cali likes to play alot.
Guest
Posts: n/a
sorry WRXed but we didnt have the numbers to bring Davis down in the general election because he is the only politician close to as for sale G. DuB. so wisely he trashed Rirdon (sp) on TV took advantage of the inane primary system that encourages extremism in politics.
This is just the chance the Republican party has to get back on thier feet in CA...they wont they'll duff it.
Its the same if you look at the fact the democrats have the perfect political storm brewing and cant find anyone credible enough or moderate enough to be Bush.
food for thought
This is just the chance the Republican party has to get back on thier feet in CA...they wont they'll duff it.
Its the same if you look at the fact the democrats have the perfect political storm brewing and cant find anyone credible enough or moderate enough to be Bush.
food for thought
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 435
From: keep santa cruz weird
Car Info: 2003 blue EVO
Originally posted by prodrive121
This is just the chance the Republican party has to get back on thier feet in CA...they wont they'll duff it.
Its the same if you look at the fact the democrats have the perfect political storm brewing and cant find anyone credible enough or moderate enough to be Bush.
food for thought
This is just the chance the Republican party has to get back on thier feet in CA...they wont they'll duff it.
Its the same if you look at the fact the democrats have the perfect political storm brewing and cant find anyone credible enough or moderate enough to be Bush.
food for thought
The republican representative who is the driving force behind the recall effort is an accuesss car thief. Has a police and court record to prove it too.
the SFGate article
The second-term San Diego area congressman has pumped $1 million into the campaign to recall Davis and has declared he will run for governor should the recall qualify for the ballot this year. Issa's previous political campaigns have been roiled by allegations that twice -- once while a student in his hometown of Cleveland and once while a soldier in Pennsylvania -- he also was involved in car thefts.
In the San Jose case, Issa, who at the time was a 27-year-old U.S. Army officer, and William Issa, 29, were arrested by San Jose police on a felony auto-theft charge in February 1980.
In the San Jose case, Issa, who at the time was a 27-year-old U.S. Army officer, and William Issa, 29, were arrested by San Jose police on a felony auto-theft charge in February 1980.
How can you call Issa credible when he is has a documented history of car theft?
look, davis' mistake was assuming that all the taxes from the business in kalifornia would make up the bulk of the state budget.
it didnt. dotcom went and gone.
where does he look to now? cutting back everything. see? he is a republican after all...
it didnt. dotcom went and gone.
where does he look to now? cutting back everything. see? he is a republican after all...
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 435
From: keep santa cruz weird
Car Info: 2003 blue EVO
Originally posted by prodrive121
Hey thats a 16,ooo dollar car...
Gray daivs stole a multi-billion dollar budget surplus...
Hey thats a 16,ooo dollar car...
Gray daivs stole a multi-billion dollar budget surplus...
If he has such low morals as to steal cars, why do you think he would be a good representative of the republican party?
for example, Clinton's affair with an intern was imoral, but legal. Issa's car theft history is not only imoral but illegal. Why is he so much better than Davis? Davis does not have a police record that I am aware of.
And if you want to talk about stealing budget surpluses, ShrubCo has totallly surpassed Davis by taking our country from it's first budget surplus in 20+ years and turned into a very impressive 500 billion dollar deficit, in 3 years for crips sakes!! No other president in history has done so much damage to our nations fiscal health than ShrubCo.
Guest
Posts: n/a
ShrubCo...thats good i may take that for my own, As for the performance and caliber of our fearless leader...I can only say he is decisive, and i agree he is no clinton.
The crack about the car was just a joke, as for the govenor ship of CA I think Rirodan is the best answer, he handeled LA quite well.
DAvis needs to go for the same rasons it think Bush will they listened to moronic economists who gave outlandish foracasts and assumed the markets and business cycles had ended w/the .coms...oops they came back. They are both idiots
The crack about the car was just a joke, as for the govenor ship of CA I think Rirodan is the best answer, he handeled LA quite well.
DAvis needs to go for the same rasons it think Bush will they listened to moronic economists who gave outlandish foracasts and assumed the markets and business cycles had ended w/the .coms...oops they came back. They are both idiots
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by ldivinag
where does he look to now? cutting back everything. see? he is a republican after all...
where does he look to now? cutting back everything. see? he is a republican after all...
as 55K is going to the starting line for the highest tax bracket hope you like being lumped in with the guys that make 144k now
go Gray
i was reading TIME mag last nite.
small blurb. those in the 14k to around 26k income range pay little or no income tax.
yet they want more tax breaks for that segment?
WTH?!?
(slightly deviating from the thread...)
small blurb. those in the 14k to around 26k income range pay little or no income tax.
yet they want more tax breaks for that segment?
WTH?!?
(slightly deviating from the thread...)
Originally posted by chrisw
for example, Clinton's affair with an intern was imoral, but legal.
for example, Clinton's affair with an intern was imoral, but legal.
plus, you have think, issa's stuff was way before. maybe the man's changed.
but klinton... well, he did it in office and forever tarnished the office of the presidency of the united states...

but hey... it depends on what your definition of IS is... right?
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 435
From: keep santa cruz weird
Car Info: 2003 blue EVO
Originally posted by ldivinag
in some states, what he did is illegal... still laws in the books...
plus, you have think, issa's stuff was way before. maybe the man's changed.
but klinton... well, he did it in office and forever tarnished the office of the presidency of the united states...
but hey... it depends on what your definition of IS is... right?
in some states, what he did is illegal... still laws in the books...
plus, you have think, issa's stuff was way before. maybe the man's changed.
but klinton... well, he did it in office and forever tarnished the office of the presidency of the united states...

but hey... it depends on what your definition of IS is... right?
As for clinton, he broke no federal law. But I still don't agree with what he did. He lied while in office, just shrubCo lied about Iraq's WMD programs.
Who's lie damaged the country more? Clinton, shrubco? Clinton didn't start a war, cost the lives of US troops from his lieing now did he?
Dahveed aka Robin Hood
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,793
From: Robbin' the Hood (Claycord)
Car Info: (RIP) '04 STi Silver
my take
Gray Davis, believe it or not, isn't totally at fault for the energy crisis. The last energy deregulation plan was approved by Pete Wilson. Cali got screwed by the Feds when they showed evidence that the energy companies were abusing the state. The Feds don't care, and that is BS.
Cali residents want medical MJ, and voted it into law. The Feds disagree, and the U.S. Supremes voted that doctors cannot prescribe it legally, so basically its a case of Federal law superceding State law. Cali residents won't stand for that, and our Cali attorney general has basically told the DEA to sit on their nightsticks and spin. Cali cries: "States' Rights", and the Feds will point out Slavery and Segregation as precedents for Fed intervention. It really sucks.
Riordan, AFIK, was supposedly a moderate republican. He would have to be to be Mayor of L.A., which voted in socialist bastards like Villaraigoso to rep them in the State Assembly/Senate.
One republican I outright hated was Dan Lundgren, who used to be state attorney general under Pete Wilson.
As far as Cali budget crises go, I don't know if the Governor even has the power to straighten out all the problems.
Due to problems with local politics and environmental issues, Northern California cannot build freeways fast enough (post '89 quake, I-580/I-680 interchange), and when they finally get around to it, what they build is obsolete by the time its completed.
I could go on for days about our isht public school systems, and how they are so good at wasting our money. Anyone that owns a house knows what I mean.
As far as the morality/criminal issue of Issa goes, I can't trust someone who commits that kind of criminal act & fraud. I would have voted for a 3rd. term for Clinton, because I thought the whole Lewinsky thing was BS (who cares who you're tapping!!! so many people cheat, why be a puritan hipocrite?).
Cali residents want medical MJ, and voted it into law. The Feds disagree, and the U.S. Supremes voted that doctors cannot prescribe it legally, so basically its a case of Federal law superceding State law. Cali residents won't stand for that, and our Cali attorney general has basically told the DEA to sit on their nightsticks and spin. Cali cries: "States' Rights", and the Feds will point out Slavery and Segregation as precedents for Fed intervention. It really sucks.
Riordan, AFIK, was supposedly a moderate republican. He would have to be to be Mayor of L.A., which voted in socialist bastards like Villaraigoso to rep them in the State Assembly/Senate.
One republican I outright hated was Dan Lundgren, who used to be state attorney general under Pete Wilson.
As far as Cali budget crises go, I don't know if the Governor even has the power to straighten out all the problems.
Due to problems with local politics and environmental issues, Northern California cannot build freeways fast enough (post '89 quake, I-580/I-680 interchange), and when they finally get around to it, what they build is obsolete by the time its completed.
I could go on for days about our isht public school systems, and how they are so good at wasting our money. Anyone that owns a house knows what I mean.
As far as the morality/criminal issue of Issa goes, I can't trust someone who commits that kind of criminal act & fraud. I would have voted for a 3rd. term for Clinton, because I thought the whole Lewinsky thing was BS (who cares who you're tapping!!! so many people cheat, why be a puritan hipocrite?).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newyorkreload
Teh Politics Forum
6
Sep 28, 2010 08:48 AM
calibredwrx
Sacramento & Reno
3
Nov 1, 2004 01:12 PM




