Subaru needs to step up...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 02:27 PM
  #46  
Funks's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 608
From: Dublin, CA
Car Info: STI Hatch - 2012
Originally Posted by Overbear
Then go buy the 370Z and STFU. I don't know about you, but I will take my high resale value, my five star crash rating, my top rated award winning bumper to bumper build quality, and my 150k millage motor...that I point out will blow your "370z" away both in the 1/4 and on the track.
Great argument there.. We are talking about the engine man not the chassis, and Subaru hasn't kept up.

It's only a car, don't get all butt hurt over it like you are bent over. I also have an STI but it's good to be objective, less stress in your life.
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 02:28 PM
  #47  
d3rock's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 502
From: Sacramento CA
Car Info: '11 GV WRX, '12 Chevy Tahoe LTZ, '19 Kawi Z400
It's what makes a Subaru a Subaru... consistency
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 02:36 PM
  #48  
Funks's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 608
From: Dublin, CA
Car Info: STI Hatch - 2012
Originally Posted by kamnewton
Why do you still own a subaru?
Because other attributes of the car are quite good but the thread of this title is "Subaru needs to step up". My comment was, Subaru needs to do better on the engine, as the rest of the power train is good.

Same reason why old owners won't be upgrading to the new platform until a better engine is out (also no hatch).

This thread is quite contentious but the comments are supposed to support or argue against the topic - your response falls under "ad hominem" fallacy.
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 02:37 PM
  #49  
OneManArmy's Avatar
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
Originally Posted by 04GG
32K BMW yeah right. Mine was $28K and after adding options it was nearly $40K, since they charge you for EVERYTHING. Really? You charged me for slip on chrome exhaust tips? WTF?

CLA looks nice, but it is FWD! MB Camry for the lose. I see a lot of them already. MEH.
Rule #1... **** options. LOL!

Buy them later. It's pretty rare that it makes sense. It has to be something where a certain option is only available with a certain package or it's been optioned out and sat on the lot so they're selling it for essentially the cost without the options. LOL!

But yeah... the higher profile the car the more the options costs. Oh you want a switch for your window.... $10,000. LOL!
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 02:43 PM
  #50  
04GG's Avatar
If in doubt, FLAT OUT
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,046
From: Nor Cal SJ
Car Info: 2010 Hatch, 2011 Sedan
Originally Posted by OneManArmy
Rule #1... **** options. LOL!

Buy them later. It's pretty rare that it makes sense. It has to be something where a certain option is only available with a certain package or it's been optioned out and sat on the lot so they're selling it for essentially the cost without the options. LOL!

But yeah... the higher profile the car the more the options costs. Oh you want a switch for your window.... $10,000. LOL!
Wanted to have the sport package and that's a big chunk of it right there. Easier to do it up front unless you intend to go with aftermarket suspension, which I did not want to do on that one since it was for her. At least it was a manual
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 04:00 PM
  #51  
sigma pi's Avatar
9 to 5 mod
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 57,389
From: Chavez Ravine
Car Info: 03 Impreza WRX
Originally Posted by 04GG
32K BMW yeah right. Mine was $28K and after adding options it was nearly $40K, since they charge you for EVERYTHING. Really? You charged me for slip on chrome exhaust tips? WTF?

CLA looks nice, but it is FWD! MB Camry for the lose. I see a lot of them already. MEH.
OK so we are in STi territory
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 05:02 PM
  #52  
Snoopy408's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,624
From: San Jose
Car Info: 2001 Acura TL - 2016.5 Mazda CX-5
Originally Posted by Roo
Ford is simply importing their European spec cars, and doing away with building anything in America. The gas-guzzling penile extension is the only exception to that rule. As far as the rest, Ray has this down cold.
Actually some companies are moving some production back to the US.
For example Ford:
Ford Bringing Jobs Back To The U.S. At Its Fusion Plant
Not many jobs but 12,500 in 2 years is pretty good.
Unsure how you came up with them not building anything in America?
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 05:37 PM
  #53  
OneManArmy's Avatar
General Pimpin'
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23,019
From: Knee deep in beer. subabrew crew, ca.
Car Info: MY04 aspen wrx wagon.
Originally Posted by Snoopy408
Actually some companies are moving some production back to the US.
For example Ford:
Ford Bringing Jobs Back To The U.S. At Its Fusion Plant
Not many jobs but 12,500 in 2 years is pretty good.
Unsure how you came up with them not building anything in America?
Friend of mine works for Ford.

Ford is moving jobs back to the US which is nice. Subaru is putting more jobs in the U.S. as well.

Generally speaking, manufacturing is slowly returning to the US. Foreign and Domestic. It's becoming less and less reasonable to do it foreign for US based companies and it's making more and more sense for foreign to send it to the US as well. Closer to the majority of their market.

More companies are starting to do the things that we did to scare these companies away in the first place. With a more level playing field it makes sense to keep it or send it here.

My opinion, the government needs to tax outsourcing jobs. Make it even more of a level field... if it costs the same to produce it overseas then why not keep it here?

And even with our crap economy right now we're still one of the more stable economies as well as political areas to produce goods. With more and more crap going on in the middle east, eastern europe and scattered all over Asia it's more and more volatile.
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 05:45 PM
  #54  
kamnewton's Avatar
White Lightning
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 318
From: Ar-kansas
Car Info: Built, 6-Speed, E85, #pluskey 06 Wagon
I always figured the reason they didn't increase power is because WRC spec cars are always right around 300hp.
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 06:06 PM
  #55  
Kaimino's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 339
From: Bay Area, CA
Car Info: a blue car.
WRC-spec is now ~350bhp now out of 1.6L

Hyundai i20, Citroen DS3, Ford Fiesta, Volskwagen Polo R are the only "models" competing right now.
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 07:11 PM
  #56  
G_Ride's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,634
From: Campbell, CA
Car Info: Some sort of Subaru
Originally Posted by Kaimino
WRC-spec is now ~350bhp now out of 1.6L

Hyundai i20, Citroen DS3, Ford Fiesta, Volskwagen Polo R are the only "models" competing right now.
It's still ~300hp for WRC.
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 10:26 PM
  #57  
queeg9k's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,849
From: Cheesesteakville
Car Info: 05 wrx wagon, 90 celica alltrac, 66 mustang
I would like to see a "luxury" line. "Lexus" legacy or something like that, if that makes sense. All the complaining about horsepower, I have yet to want for more of it. I have yet to out drive my car but that's just me. Its not a muscle car.

Apparently martinis make me say "I have yet" a lot.
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 10:55 PM
  #58  
Scoobywax's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,228
From: Santa Cruz, California
Car Info: 2006 obp wrx limited sedan
Originally Posted by queeg9k
I would like to see a "luxury" line. "Lexus" legacy or something like that, if that makes sense. All the complaining about horsepower, I have yet to want for more of it. I have yet to out drive my car but that's just me. Its not a muscle car.

Apparently martinis make me say "I have yet" a lot.
Well comparing a legacy same year with wrx id say thats luxury already lol.
I opted for a wrx limited and its nowhere near as nice as a legacy with the same package.
Old Apr 21, 2014 | 11:39 PM
  #59  
Roo's Avatar
Roo
Thread Starter
Forester Specialist
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,985
From: Sonoma County
Car Info: '98/'04 Foresters (S & XT)
Interesting discussion. So we have a divided group part of whom likes the 300 hp that's traditional, and some who would like more. When I last looked on the showroom floor at an STi, the price tag started with a 4 for a fully optioned version. Perhaps I'd just like to see the STi come out with something a little hotter, faster, and keep the fun factor.
Old Apr 22, 2014 | 12:26 AM
  #60  
slow04wrx's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,453
I think a very high percentage of sti's get modded. Having more than 300hp shouldn't break it for you thats insane. Being under the idea the sti is a perfect machine with 300hp and can't be better with messing it up is highly mistaken. I think most people being put in this 300hp category are saying simply making more hp isn't going to make the sti a different or better car.

The issue is subaru has failed to take any extreme measure or another on the sti. They didn't try to cut it down to a 3100 lb car, they didn't give it crazy aero pits and after market type goodies, they didn't raise the power. They didn't make it look wild. All they have done is increase the chassis and suspension / diffs which is something that you can't really see on paper. Subaru has seemingly failed to make the car anymore hardcore, at least to anyone who just reads it's spec on paper.

All we need is carbon roof, even better bigger brakes, full array of bolt on things like strut bars and chasis bracing bars, 350hp, 8k redline less than 3200lbs, track day goodies like harness, safety equip, neat shades of paint. That being said I think a new sti modded to my taste would be amazing.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:50 AM.